ROCHESTER, N.Y. ? When a drug-addicted homeless woman had her newborn taken away last spring, she agreed the baby should be placed in foster care with her three other children.

A year later, a judge delivered a startling postscript: She ordered the parents to have no more children until they proved they could look after the ones they already had.

“All babies deserve more than to be born to parents who have proven they cannot possibly raise or parent a child,” Family Court Judge Marilyn O’Connor wrote in a 12-page opinion. “The cycle of neglect … needs to stop.”

The unusual ruling has outraged civil libertarians, and was made all the more difficult by the revelation that the mother of the 1-year-old girl is already pregnant again.

But many lauded the government’s desire to ensure children are raised in a healthy environment. A Rochester newspaper columnist, Mark Hare, echoed a multitude of radio talk-show callers in applauding “a wake-up call” to all parents to “put our children first.”

It was the first known decision of its kind in New York, but courts in Wisconsin and Ohio have upheld similar rulings involving “deadbeat dads” who failed to pay child support. In other states, judges have turned back attempts to interfere with a person’s right to procreate.

The infant girl’s father, Rodney Evers, an admitted cocaine addict who stays periodically at the House of Mercy shelter for the homeless, described O’Connor’s judgment as demeaning.

“I can’t abide by something like that,” said Evers, 54, his gaunt face and graying goatee shaded by a baseball cap. “I know for a fact that God said ‘be fruitful and multiply.’ This is telling me I have to be celibate. Man cannot play God.”

The couple has struggled for years to find work and shelter and both have admitted in court to abusing drugs and alcohol. Evers is the father of three of the four children, including a 6-year-old boy. The youngest three, ages 4, 2 and 1, tested positive for cocaine at birth.

In a March 31 ruling made public last week, the judge said she was not forcing contraception or sterilization on the couple and was not requiring the mother to get an abortion should she become pregnant. But the couple could be jailed for contempt if they have another child.

It was unclear what effect the order could have on the 35-year-old mother, identified in court papers only as Stephanie.

At a preliminary hearing Thursday to explore whether the foster parents of her 2-year-old son could adopt him, the woman’s relatives revealed she became pregnant in mid-March with her fifth child — two weeks before the judge’s order.

O’Connor, 66, a Democrat first elected in 2000, said in her ruling that under U.S. Supreme Court decisions, “the rights to conceive and to raise one’s children have been deemed ‘essential”‘ as opposed to merely establishing that “the right to conceive a child is essential.”