Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, March 7, 2004

Blacks differ on portraying gay rights as civil rights

March 7, 2004

Advertisement

When small-town Mayor Jason West started presiding over gay weddings, he saw it as nothing short of "the flowering of the largest civil rights movement the country's had in a generation."

"The people who would forbid gays from marrying in this country are those who would have made Rosa Parks sit in the back of the bus," said the Green Party mayor of New Paltz, N.Y.

West's words have a strong resonance for gays and lesbians who feel their rights are being denied, but for blacks who worked to end racial discrimination in the 1950s and '60s, the reaction is decidedly mixed. Some civil rights leaders find the comparison apt, but other blacks call it disgraceful.

"The gay community is pimping the civil rights movement and the history," said the Rev. Gene Rivers, a black Boston minister and president of the National Ten-Point Leadership Foundation. "In the view of many, it's racist at worst, cynical at best."

With gay marriage emerging as the nation's hot-button social issue, American blacks find themselves being courted as a special ally by both camps. Many are conflicted about attempts to equate the civil disobedience of homosexual unions with still-vivid memories of voting-rights protesters mauled by snarling police dogs.

Some conservative groups are appealing directly to black congregations to block attempts to co-opt the language of the civil rights movement.

"We oppose attempts to equate homosexuality with civil rights or compare it to benign characteristics such as skin color or place of origin," says a Web site from the Family Research Council.

'Discrimination is discrimination'

Meanwhile, civil rights luminaries such as NAACP board chairman Julian Bond and Rep. John Lewis, one of the organizers of the 1963 march on Washington, have spoken on the side of gay marriage. Bond said he supported "gay civil or religious marriage."

"Discrimination is discrimination -- no matter who the victim is, and it is always wrong," he said. "There are no 'special rights' in America, despite the attempts by many to divide blacks and the gay community with the argument that the latter are seeking some imaginary 'special rights' at the expense of blacks."

Lewis filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Massachusetts case that led to the first unequivocal state ruling recognizing same-sex marriage.

In its November decision, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court cited the landmark school desegregation case, Brown v. Board of Education. The first licenses are scheduled to be issued there May 17 -- the 50th anniversary of Brown.

Gays weren't slaves

The Rev. Joseph Lowery agrees that American blacks should clearly sympathize with the gay community's fight for rights.

But Lowery, who founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference with Martin Luther King Jr., said the sheer weight of U.S. history precluded too close a comparison.

"Homosexuals as people have never been enslaved because of their sexual orientation," he argued. "They may have been scorned; they may have been discriminated against. But they've never been enslaved and declared less than human."

The Rev. Jesse Jackson, while supporting "equal protection under the law" for gays, agreed that comparisons to the struggles of the civil rights movement are "a stretch."

"Gays were never called three-fifths human in the Constitution," he said during a recent appearance at Harvard Law School.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.