New NCAA boss must rely on bark

Indiana University president Brand will have no bite in organization fractured by divisions

Some people remember Myles Brand for firing Bob Knight at Indiana University.

I also remember him accepting a game ball from Knight’s successor, Mike Davis, during the Hoosiers’ NCAA tournament run last March, and grinning like a freshman who had just hit a winning shot at the buzzer.

That’s why I hesitate to herald Brand’s hiring as NCAA president as a new day in college sports, as NCAA search committee chairman Robert Lawless did last week.

“This selection marks the beginning of a new era,” said Lawless, president of the University of Tulsa.

True, Brand is the first university president to hold a job that always has belonged to a member of the great American jockocracy. But Brand long has been a friend, not to say a promoter, of big-time athletics.

Personable, well-spoken and loaded with academic credentials, Brand is a fine front man for the NCAA’s effort to make an increasingly skeptical public believe college sports is more about college than sports.

The real bottom line at the NCAA always will have a dollar sign attached to it. Don’t expect that to change under Brand. Brand seemed to stand on the side of reform when he spoke to the National Press Club last year. In an oft-quoted speech, Brand said he didn’t want to eliminate big-time sports.

“I just want to lower the volume,” he said.

But word apparently never made it back to Brand’s own campus in Bloomington. Officials there are scheming to fund a $40 million athletics-facilities campaign aimed at improving the Hoosiers’ chances to compete for conference and national titles in all sports.

That’s not lowering the volume.

Brand did lower the volume and the boom on Knight. But for much of Brand’s Indiana tenure he has been viewed widely as a puppet who, like his predecessors, had no interest in disciplining the Hoosiers’ basketball coach, or making him accountable for his actions in any way.

To his credit, Brand stood fast in the face of death threats.

Brand has little real power in an organization literally fractured by divisionsDivisions I, II and III. He can’t veto legislation. He doesn’t set budgets.

Brand’s influence will come through persuasion. His job is to set agendas, and also to rebut the NCAA’s growing number of critics.

For example, the first time a TV talk show wants to hammer the NCAA for having so few black head football coaches, Brand can go in front of the camera and point out that he hired Davis, the first black head coach of any sport in Indiana history.

Brand has yet to outline an agenda. Wisely, he says he will spend the first few months on the job listening.

He no doubt will hear from people urging him to support a playoff in Division I-A football. Brand may listen, but he is unlikely to betray his pals in the Big Ten.

It’s possible Brand will distance himself from the big-time sports culture when he moves 50 or so miles north to his new office in Indianapolis. He may become an advocate for reform.

But if the NCAA really wanted Brand to clean up college sports, it would give him a steam shovel, or perhaps a flame-thrower. Instead, it’s giving him a microphone.