Public process
This development was passed through by the city planning staff, reviewed by the city attorney and was approved by the city planning commission based on a 1973 development plan that the city of Lawrence cannot find documentation was ever approved.
Despite the murky status of this 30-year-old development plan, the project was approved without a public meeting. A lot has changed in 30 years. There were several junctures in this approval process where the planning staff, the city attorney, or the planning commission could have made a choice to allow the public to be heard. Instead, these commissions made a deliberate decisions that excluded the public from the process.
Beyond the fact that the rationale for excluding the public was based upon the use of the questionable 1973 development plan, there were other inconsistencies in the normal city review process. Taken together, these could have, should have, allowed any of these individuals and commissions the justification to at least err on the side of the public they are tasked to serve. The citizens went to the BZA meeting to be heard in a free and open forum where their concerns could be considered by the government officials elected to steward our community.
However, they were silenced.
Mark Stone,
Lawrence

