Advertisement

Talk about the race for Congress with Democrat Nancy Boyda

October 11, 2006

This chat has already taken place. Read the transcript below.

Nancy Boyda

<a href="http://www2.ljworld.com/elections/2006/nov/07/candidates/boyda/">Nancy Boyda</a> first ran in 2004 against incumbent U.S. Rep. Jim Ryun, a Republican, and lost. The Democrat is back for another go-round - this time, she says, trying to run more of a grassroots campaign instead of relying on the backing of the national party. She takes your questions at 2:15 p.m. Oct. 11.

Moderator:

Good afternoon. This is Dennis Anderson, managing editor of the Lawrence Journal-World. I will be moderating today's online chat with Nancy Boyda, Democratic candidate for Congress in the second district. Welcome, Mrs. Boyda.

Nancy Boyda:

Thank you Dennis! I love this. Feels very interactive. Hope we get some good questions.

Moderator:

We apologize for the delay. We've had some technical difficulties. Here comes the first question.

justthefacts:

If elected, what specific things will you do (or not do) that differ from the incumbent?

Why do you think negative campaigns continue to be run?

It appears that the day & age of compromise, civility, good-manners and the statesman (or woman) is dead and gone and that the atmosphere in DC (Madeline Albright called it "toxic"). Why do you think this is so, and is there anything that anyone (officials or general public) can do about the level of acrimony and animosity in politics?

Nancy Boyda:

I actually have a great deal of hope.....certainly a lot more than two years ago. People have had it and they are ready for change.

What gives me the most hope is the James Bker Iraq study group. It's a BIPARTISAN group of high level, well respected diplomats, military people and policy people who have been asked to step in a provide some "adult supervision" for this administration. They are expected to provide recommendations about Iraq AFTER the election. That works for me. We HAVE to take politics out adn get to real solutions.

I pray (literally) their recommendations will be ones I and the American people can get behind. After the Iraq study group, we MUST have healthcare and energy policy study groups. All the big issues will absolutely require bipartisan solutions.

As a life long REpublican and Democrat for last 3 years, I speak both languages pretty well. I think I'm in a unique position to work with both sides of the aisle.

samsonwharris:

It has been argued that there are only two solutions to the War in Iraq - stay the course or leave. Is there a middle ground and can you see benifit to a middle ground?

Nancy Boyda:

YES! Of course there is middle ground. The Republicans have framed the discussion to "are you for cut and run or are you for stay the course?" It's done a great deal to STOP real discussion and make sure NO solutions are found. We can't solve these important issues with quick slogans...our democracy depends on a discussion of the issues. The Baker Iraq study group will certainly be looking for middle ground. Thank heaven!

laurensturm:

Dear Nancy,

In your first 100 days, what would be your highest priority for legislative accomplishment as our new 2nd District Rep.?

Nancy Boyda:

1) We must break the tie between money and elections. That starts with electing representatives who are not in teh pockets of big money. Then.....we MUST look at real campaign reform.
2) I think Congress has 18-24 months to come up wiht a BIPARTISAN solution to healthcare and to energy. I hope to be part of voice that will holler from teh rooftops until that is heard.
Nothing will change until WE change Congress. If you want REAL change, we need to elect good people, but then YOU need to stay involved and hold Congress accountable.

sarahkatheryn:

What would you do to fix the health care crisis in America?

Nancy Boyda:

We need a BIPARTISAN solution to healthcare. There are 300 MILLION of us in this country. THere isn;t a perfect plan for everyone. If the dems or the republicans try to do it alone, it will get killed.

We already spend twice as much as other industrialzed countries on healthcare. We don't need to spend more money, we need to spend it smarter.....much smarter. This bi-partisan plan should look at Universal Healthcare, the Massachusetts plan, the California plan. Everything has problems, everything has benefits.

I feel certain Americans can solve this if stop the paritisan bickering.

Moderator:

Our time with Mrs. Boyda is limited today. I want to thank her for coming in an answering our readers' questions.

Nancy Boyda:

Thank you for the good questions. Not surprising a lot of questions about healthcare. It's on everyone's mind. Four more weeks! I'm aksing for your votes. We must have chnage in Congress! Hope to see you all on Victory night at the Topeka Ramada.

Comments

Steve Jacob 7 years, 6 months ago

From Esquire Magaizine November issue with Scarlett Johansson on the cover :) says...

"Ryan is an ultraconervative evangelical Christian, but his moral superiority didn't stop him from purchasing a townhouse at below market price from a sham family-values organization that served, in reality, as an Abramoff-DeLay slush fund. Esquire endorses Boyda."

Nice

0

Godot 7 years, 6 months ago

"Anyone trying to make a decision on who to vote for in this race got absolutely NOTHING out of this chat. Very WEAK."

Just like the candidate.

0

Ken Miller 7 years, 6 months ago

There were more softballs tossed here than at YSI on a Saturday afternoon. Jeez, the L J-W is supposed to facilitate the asking of TOUGH questions. Did Nancy Boyda pre-approve the questions? Anyone trying to make a decision on who to vote for in this race got absolutely NOTHING out of this chat. Very WEAK.

0

ljreader 7 years, 6 months ago

why does she always yell BIPARTISAN?

0

logrithmic 7 years, 6 months ago

While this was a weak chat, primarily due to the limitation on the number of questions asked, I would say one thing to Nancy. James Baker is the legal representative of the Saudi Arabian government. It should be public knowledge, but is not, that he is presently representing the Saudis against the victims of 9-11, who have sued the Saudis for compensation related to the deaths of their relatives. Why? 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and Bin Laden is a Saudi. This fact is often ignored by the rightwing corporate media.

As Fahrenheit 911 by Michael Moore pointed out, Bush's family has made over $200 million from Saudi investments in their ventures over the years, the Saudis receive Secret Service protection (courtesy of the US taxpayer), they own about 1/6 of our economy, and, immediately after 9-11, Bush flew members of the Bin Laden family out of the United States before they could be questioned, this at a time when all American flights were grounded by the government.

Nancy, be careful where you place your hope.....

0

opinion 7 years, 6 months ago

It's too bad they experienced some technical difficulties. I know I had submitted some questions that were a bit tougher and would have liked to see her answer. Oh well, an opportunity lost for her to do more than the simple, non specific responses.

Mr. Moore, on the earlier chat, answered some tough questions. I respect that - don't agree with everything he said but at least he laid it on the line.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.