Seattle ? Right now, your boss, your spouse or the government could secretly be reading all your typed words  even the ones you deleted  while surreptitiously snapping your picture.

Sound alarming? The man who makes it possible is the first to agree.

“It’s horrifying!” said Richard Eaton, who develops, markets and even answers the technical help line for WinWhatWhere Corp. software.

“I’m Mr. Guard-My-Privacy, so it’s kind of ironic,” said Eaton, a lanky 48-year-old with a diamond stud earring. “Every time I add a feature into it, usually it’s something that I’ve fought for a long time.”

His qualms haven’t stopped him from selling the product, though  more than 200,000 copies of it, to everyone from suspicious spouses to the FBI.

And Eaton is building ever-more-detailed monitoring tricks into his Investigator software. The latest version, released this month, can snap pictures from a WebCam, save screen shots and read keystrokes in multiple languages.

Investigator already can read every e-mail, instant message and document you send and receive, even if you delete  or never even saved  what you typed.

The $99 downloadable program runs “hidden in plain sight.” It changes names every so often, and files containing the information it gathers are given arbitrary old dates to make them difficult to find.

The monitor can choose to have a user’s every move sent to an e-mail address, or the program can be instructed to look for keywords like “boss,” “pornography” or “terrorist” and only send records when it finds those prompts.

Popular product

Software like Investigator was virtually unknown two years ago. Now it’s become a lucrative niche market, attracting plenty of competitors and at least one product that aims to track down the snooping software itself.

Federal investigators in Seattle used Investigator to snag suspected Russian computer hackers, one of whom was recently convicted on 20 counts including conspiracy, various computer crimes and fraud.

Another, similar product was used in the FBI’s investigation of alleged mobster Nicodemo Scarfo Jr.

A Maywood, N.J., security firm called Corporate Defense Strategies used Investigator at an import/export firm to snare two employees who were selling company merchandise and pocketing the cash.

CDS President Jeff Prusan has since used it to help clients catch employees who send out resumes, download pornography or spend their shifts playing games.

“It’s unfortunate that it has come to this, but I’ve always believed that it’s better to know what’s going on than not,” Prusan said.

Miki Compson, a computer consultant and mother of four in Severn, Md., used Investigator to track computer correspondence from a suspicious person who she said ended up stalking her daughter.

She’s recommended it to other parents whose children were corresponding with adults and defends the practice as a safety measure.

Individual uses

Eaton says he wouldn’t likely use it on his own two children  “I’d talk to them!”  but he also doesn’t feel comfortable telling people what to do with his invention.

And although he hates to hear tales of deception in the fast-growing market of spouse-tracking online, he wouldn’t tell people not to do it.

“I’m selling a hammer,” he said. “They can beat nails with it, or their dog.”

If someone calls with proof the software is being used nefariously, Eaton said he’ll show the person how to remove it.

Ari Schwartz, associate director for the Center for Democracy and Technology, said there are legitimate uses for the product, such as catching employees engaging in fraud or child pornography.

But Schwartz recommends that employers inform their staffs if monitoring for certain activities is occurring. He also urges spouses and parents to think about the repercussions before using such software at home.

“If your relationship is at the point where you feel that you need to spy on your spouse, is this the best way to repair your relationship or perhaps (should) you be going to therapy?” he said.

In most cases, Schwartz said, snooping software is not illegal. But “we think morally there are some very large issues with (employers) tracking the personal habits of their employees.”