Archive for Friday, February 9, 2018

Trump won’t declassify Democratic memo on Russia probe

February 9, 2018


Washington — Citing national security concerns, the White House on Friday formally notified the House intelligence committee that President Donald Trump is “unable” to declassify a memo drafted by Democrats that counters GOP allegations about abuse of government surveillance powers in the FBI’s Russia probe.

White House counsel Don McGahn said in a letter to the committee that the memo contains “numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages” and asked the Democrats to revise the memo with the help of the Justice Department. He said Trump is still “inclined” to release the memo in the interest of transparency if revisions are made.

The president’s rejection of the Democratic memo is in contrast to his enthusiastic embrace of releasing the Republican document, which he pledged before reading to make public. The president declassified the document last week, allowing its publication in full.

The president has said the GOP memo “vindicates” him in the ongoing Russia investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller. But congressional Democrats and Republicans, including House Speaker Paul Ryan and Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, who helped draft the GOP memo, have said it shouldn’t be used to undermine the special counsel.

On Friday, White House spokesman Raj Shah said Trump discussed the Democratic document with the White House counsel’s office, FBI Director Christopher Wray and another top Justice Department official.

The president had until Saturday to decide whether to allow the classified material to become public after the House intelligence committee voted Monday to release it.

In declining to declassify the document, the White House also sent lawmakers a letter signed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Wray, as well as a marked-up copy of the memo, laying out portions it considers too sensitive to make public. Among those passages are some that the Justice Departments says could compromise intelligence sources and methods, ongoing investigations and national security if disclosed.

The document in question was authored by Democrats on the intelligence panel. They say it disputes many claims in the GOP memo, which accused the FBI and Justice Department of abusing their surveillance powers in obtaining a secret warrant to monitor former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page.

The memo’s release would have capped off a week in which Republicans and Democrats on the committee have publicly fought, with the panel now erecting a wall to separate feuding Republican and Democratic staffers who had long sat side by side.

The disagreements have escalated over the last year as Democrats have charged that Republicans aren’t taking the panel’s investigation into Russian election meddling seriously enough. They say the GOP memo, led by chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., is designed as a distraction from the probe, which is looking into whether Trump’s campaign was in any way connected to the Russian interference.

Trump declassified the GOP-authored memo over the objections of the FBI, which said it had “grave concerns” about the document’s accuracy.

In the so-called Nunes memo, Republicans took aim at the FBI and the Justice Department over the use of information from former British spy Christopher Steele in obtaining a warrant to monitor Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA. The main allegation was that the FBI and Justice Department didn’t tell the court enough about Steele’s anti-Trump bias or that his work was funded in part by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

They argued that the reliance on Steele’s material amounted to an improper politicization of the government’s surveillance powers.

Democrats have countered that the GOP memo was inaccurate and a misleading collection of “cherry-picked” details.

They noted that federal law enforcement officials had informed the court about the political origins of Steele’s work and that some of the former spy’s information was corroborated by the FBI. They also noted that there was other evidence presented to the court besides Steele’s information, though they have not provided details.

The Democratic memo is expected to elaborate on these points.

House Republicans who have seen the document had said portions will almost certainly have to be redacted to protect intelligence sources and methods. Earlier this week, White House officials said the Democratic memo would go through the same national security and legal review as the Republican document. But White House chief of staff John Kelly hinted at possible redactions, saying the Democratic version is “not as clean” as the GOP’s.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, has said he will be scrutinizing the process closely.

Schiff wants the FBI and Justice Department to provide their redactions to him directly so he can compare them to any information withheld by the White House. Schiff said the comparison will help to expose any material blacked out for political purposes or to conceal embarrassing or damaging information about the president and his associates.


Steve King 2 months, 1 week ago

Raise your hand if you didn't see this coming...

Geoff Ermlap 2 months, 1 week ago

I smell a rat, er a trump. I smell a leak.

Ken Lassman 2 months, 1 week ago

"One team, one people, and one American family." and "All Americans deserve accountability and respect" still ringing in the air from his State of the Union speech, Trump jumps into the escape vehicle and gives the order to fight his enemies in door-to-door combat if necessary to save his own skin.

Bi-PART-isanship, Trump-style.

Bob Summers 2 months, 1 week ago

Memo author Schiff is the guy that Russian pranksters told him Putin had naked pics of Trump.

I would declassify for laughs

Harlan Hobbs 2 months, 1 week ago

The weasel Schiff deliberately put classified info in the 10 page report to force the President to send it back to the House. My advice to Schiff is to just go ahead and leak it on your own, like you have so much other information.

A 10 page report (the Republican's memo was only 4 pages) just reinforces the old adage, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull....."

Bob Summers 2 months, 1 week ago

Is not it fun to poke fun of a President without being called the code word "racist"?

Steve Hicks 2 months, 1 week ago

Your lingo sounds like "second language" English. And your picture makes fun of Trump...?

Is this Bob ? I mean that seriously.

Bob Summers 2 months, 1 week ago

Good humor is good humor.

I was illustrating the fact that had that been Obama and not Trump, I would be called the Liberal code word "racist" and banned from ever posting again.

Steve Hicks 2 months, 1 week ago

OK, Bob, just wanted to make sure that post was by the real Bob.. Thanks for verifying.

Can't be too careful. Not verifying is how a lot of people have been punked by Russian opinion-manipulators.

Richard Aronoff 2 months, 1 week ago

How many of you missed the line in this article that says the president is "inclined" to release the memo after the DOJ recommends revisions.

And how many of you missed all of the news reports that the Democrats would intentionally put sensitive material into the memo that would require it not being released?

Steve Hicks 2 months, 1 week ago

Richard and Harlan, you both claim Schiff and the Democrats put "classified" or "sensitive" information in the memo to force the current president to stop its release.

Would one or both of you please provide some trustworthy source(s) that verify your claims ? If some truthful sources provide sound evidence that's what happened, I would consider your claims might be true.

I'm willing to be informed, and possibly persuaded. But (no offense) I ain't taking your (or anybody else's) personal word for it. That would be a stupid thing for anyone to do, since that's how a person can get led astray by liars. You know that, right ?

Just being careful.

Reliable sources in verification, please...?

Steve Hicks 2 months, 1 week ago

Richard and Harlan, would you be so good as to give us legitimate verifying sources that your assertion (that Adam Schiff / Democrats put classified material in their memo to force the current president to refuse its release) is true ?

You didn't make that up from partisan whole cloth, did you ? You have more integrity than that, don't you ?

So I trust there are credible sources on which you base your assertions. What are they ?

Commenting has been disabled for this item.