Advertisement

Lawrence and Douglas County

Lawrence and Douglas county

City balks at plan to allow motorists to use credit cards for new downtown parking garage

August 13, 2013

Advertisement

A plan to allow downtown motorists to use credit cards to pay fees at the city’s newest parking garage is in doubt.

Lawrence city commissioners balked at the idea Tuesday night after commissioners were presented with new information about how much credit card companies would charge for the service at the new Vermont Street garage that is expected to open next month.

“When the city collects $1 for parking, we’re only going to net 48 cents, “ City Commissioner Bob Schumm said after reviewing credit card transaction fees. “That’s not very good.”

City Manager David Corliss said he had only recently received the information about the credit card fees. When asked by the Journal-World on Friday about the credit card transaction fees, he said he didn’t expect them to be an issue.

“I wish we could have had this information a little earlier,” Corliss said. “We may want to look at a less expensive system.”

Corliss had recommended the city spend about $170,000 to install a gate system on the new garage that also would give motorists the option of paying their parking fees via credit card, which would have been a first for the downtown parking system.

Corliss was recommending that the city charge 20 cents per hour for parking. But he found out only recently that typical credit card transaction fees will eat into a significant portion of the city’s parking revenue. The city actually would lose money on any credit card transaction of less than 25 cents, and would net only small sums on other transactions. For example, the city would net only 10 cents when a motorists would pay 40 cents for a two-hour parking fee.

Corliss said he wasn’t yet comfortable recommending a higher rate for the parking garage.

“The challenge is, if you charge too much, people will say they don’t want to park there,” Corliss said. “They’ll park on the street.”

Instead, Corliss asked commissioners to defer any action on the parking gate system until his office could do further research on alternatives.

Commissioners also asked Corliss to consider other changes to his recommendation. Schumm said he wanted to consider a rate system that would allow motorists to park for free for the first hour but would charger higher rates to people who parked for multiple hours. He said that may make the garage more convenient to users of the expanded library, which will be adjacent to the garage. Commissioners said they also may want to consider longer hours for the garage. Corliss had recommended charging fees from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., with the remaining time open for free parking.

In other business, commissioners:

• Unanimously agreed to file the necessary paperwork at Douglas County District Court to start the eminent domain process for a dilapidated, vacant house at 1106 Rhode Island St.

• Unanimously rejected a text amendment that would have allowed homeowners in Old West Lawrence and other RS-5 single-family zoned neighborhoods to build accessory dwelling units on their property. Several residents of single family neighborhoods expressed concern the amendment would make it easier to develop rental properties in single family neighborhoods.

Comments

New2KU 8 months, 1 week ago

I find this utterly amusing. Go ahead and charge what you want to park in this new garage. It will be empty all the time anyway. I've been downtown numerous times and have never paid to park. If you use side streets and long term lots there is always somewhere to park. Do a little walking, but that beats giving the city my money.

0

Ralph Gage 8 months, 1 week ago

The parking garage next to KU's Memorial Union is gated, uses a credit-card payment system, and this morning I was surprised that I was charged $1.75 for a shopping excursion that lasted less than 30 minutes.

0

gatekeeper 8 months, 1 week ago

People will just illegally use the DCB parking lot, just like they do when going to the pool. It's always nice to go there to do business with the bank and struggle to find a place to park while watching stay at home mom's get their kids and gear out of the car so they can enjoy the pool.

0

patkindle 8 months, 1 week ago

what about the taxpayers that pay for the library but never us its FREE services? I bet you feel for them like the folks with no kids that pay for your kids schooling or pay for the parks but never use them so you and your kids can. I guess that is their fault?

0

Richard Heckler 8 months, 1 week ago

I say forget the meters,credit card use and gates etc etc.

Get a ticket upon entering then pay an attendant when leaving. This provides employment which is good use of city tax dollars.

No Charge for using the library with validated ticket. Local shops could validate tickets as well.

And two hours no charge for shopping then 75 cents per hour for each hour thereafter.

1

patkindle 8 months, 1 week ago

it is hard for me to understand how someone can go to the FREE library, take advantage of all their FREE services, and still complain about parking fees?? who pays you to crawl out of bed each morning?

0

consumer1 8 months, 1 week ago

Free parking for those who paid for the structure! The taxpayer of Lawrence Ks.

0

kerryaltenbernd 8 months, 1 week ago

It is very important for the city to assure that there is free parking in the garage for patrons of the library. This is not uncommon, evidenced by the fact that the parking garage next to the Main Branch of the Kansas City, Missouri, Public Library provides for free parking for library patrons. Library staff are allowed to validate patrons' parking tickets so they can exit the garage without paying a fee. In addition, there are spaces near the entrance of the garage that are specifically marked for use by Library patrons.

Apparently, Corliss was arguing that library patrons had to pay in the old lot, so they should have to pay in the new one. That is not completely accurate, as there were several free, non-handicap, short-term parking stalls near the south entrance of the Library. That was before the taxpayers voted to spend tens of millions of dollars to upgrade the Library and build the parking garage, so free parking for library patrons is even more important now.

3

Lincs 8 months, 1 week ago

The library bond issue was approved 2nd November, 2010. So for almost three years the city has known that the parking garage was going to be built. Why has a major decision such as this been left until a few days before it opens?

What purpose do the charges serve? Are they really there to raise revenue for operations or are they there to disincentivize long term parking? I find it hard to believe that the meters downtown actually make much money for the city once the enforcement, meter emptying and cash processing costs have been included. But their utility is that they keep parking spaces rotating and thus I rarely have trouble parking on Mass during business hours.

If parking space rotation is the goal rather than revenue raising, a ticket and gate solution could work. A ticket is issued upon entering the garage allowing two hours free parking. Before leaving the ticket must be validated at a remote validation station at the pedestrian entrances to the garage. If you validate within two hours, you may leave the garage within the next ten minutes without charge. If you attempt to validate after two hours a payment of $5 (or whatever charge/fine is deemed appropriate) applies before you can validate your ticket. The credit card company can charge its 25 cent + 3% fee, and the city takes the rest.

0

consumer1 8 months, 1 week ago

Just as an observation, it appears the build at any cost faction, ie; Compton, Fritzell, and others have won this fight. Common sense would say that by increasing the tax base, providing taxable jobs, increasing spending would reduce or at least stabalize taxes and slow the increase. However, that certainly is not what is happening here. Another player in the modern civility war is the local city commission. Anyone who has lived here 10 years or more cannot help but see what happens when we allow a perponderance of one of these two groups take control of the city affairs. We are now in a build stage, one would think this would be great for the taxpayers of Lawrence. It might be, if... BIG IF... the builders were actually paying taxes according to what they should be. Again we have the right playing off of the left. In the past, we have had the left in office as the majority. During that time it was very clear to any new business coming to Lawrence, there would be stiff penalties and requirements if they wanted into this market. The result of that was, no one could bare the cost of doing business here and chose other options/ cities. The consequence of this flip flopping back and forth leave the local builders using the right majority to do their dirty work. My point is, while we are divided in this way, which we have always been, since the civil war, we can never realize the true benefits deserving of such great people of this city. It has long been realized the middle class carries out the wishes and command and the burdons of each parties political decisions. So whether the right is in charge or the left is in control the middle loses. It pays for the whims of each controlling commission. When the right is in control the rich get richer, when the left is in contol social services enable thousands. The middle pays for these political idealogies. What economic group makes up the middle? The working class who struggle to keep their heads above the tide waters of political game playing.

0

consumer1 8 months, 1 week ago

The History of Lawrence Ks. From the time the New England Aid Society started sending anti-slavery folks to Lawrence to build up resistence against the strong movement of the South. Lawrence has been divided in it's population. There have always been those who opposed the politics of the South and those who oppose the the politics of the North. Question? Did the civil war really start at Black Jack just outside of Baldwin, or did it start when the movement of liberals from New England swarmed Lawrence to create a Liberal Front against the South? The teams took the field at that time. Over the last century Lawrence has had an ongoing struggle for dominance between the two groups. The Mizzou v Kansas showdown was an example of civilized rivalry. When you look back to our recent history, it is easy to see the split factions of both ideals. The particular one that come to my mind is the way these (diluted) factions have played out their roles in the preservation/building of downtown Lawrence. For as long as I can remember, there has been a political sparring going on over the downtown (proper). We have the preservationist/ No new building at any cost,= The Liberal faction, and the build, build build at any cost, = The Conservative faction. The No build group has wanted to maintain the small town atmosphere that Lawrence had in the 1960's. This group represents the "old hippies" who want the status quo to remain the same. The build build build group on the other hand is loaded with the monied right wing group. They have sparred over and over and over for the development of downtown.

0

spaceface 8 months, 1 week ago

as far as I'm concerned my taxes already helped pay for the parking garage... where do I sign up for my free pass?

0

consumer1 8 months, 1 week ago

“The short memories of the American voters is what keeps our politicians in office.” ― Will Rogers

0

absolutelyridiculous 8 months, 1 week ago

I just avoid downtown as much as possible. I hate paying for parking in the garages and on the streets my taxes already pay for. You've got enough of my money. I'll go shop south iowa and eat out on west 6th street.

2

Richard Heckler 8 months, 1 week ago

If the meters were removed look for another tax or fee increase. There are a variety of ways local government increases taxes and/or fees without saying. Such as issuing bonds of sorts....

Definition of 'General Obligation Bond - GO' A municipal bond backed by the credit and "taxing power" of the issuing jurisdiction rather than the revenue from a given project.

Investopedia explains 'General Obligation Bond - GO' General obligation bonds are issued with the belief that a municipality will be able to repay its debt obligation through taxation or revenue from projects. No assets are used as collateral.

http://bonds.about.com/od/munibonds/a/The-Difference-Between-General-Obligation-And-Revenue-Bonds.htm

http://news.morningstar.com/classroom2/course.asp?docid=5384&page=2

0

ejg91780 8 months, 1 week ago

Welcome to the real world commissioners. While governments are always trying to raise taxes on businesses its nice for them to get a dose of how expensive it is to legitimatly make money these days.

0

fan4kufootball 8 months, 1 week ago

It beats me why taxpayers have to pay to park in public owned garages or in the street parking when we already have either paid or will pay taxes to construct and maintain them.

7

thewayitis 8 months, 1 week ago

They obviously have not done their research on credit card fees. There are many companies now charging 2.75% flat fee no minimum or monthly fees. I bet the phone is ringing off the hook today by some of these companies. This bid was probably from an "inside" contact.

1

nick_s 8 months, 1 week ago

Backwards. Putting the cart before the horse City Commission? Not surprised. These people make even more serious decisions than this, which is scary.

1

PhilChiles 8 months, 1 week ago

It sounds like they should be looking for a company that charges a percentage of transaction costs, as opposed to one that charges a flat fee (in this case, I'm guessing a quarter) plus a percentage. When it comes to credit card processing, you really have to shop around and look at the fine print. And our parking fees (and tickets) are some of the lowest I've seen in the country, so that makes it hard to put anything extra towards a transaction fee.

0

workinghard 8 months, 1 week ago

I find it funny that they considered credit cards for parking at all when you cannot pay your water bill with a credit card without paying a third party fee. City says it is not willing to pay the credit card fee for water but considered it for parking.

4

Richard Heckler 8 months, 1 week ago

"“When the city collects $1 for parking, we’re only going to net 48 cents, “ City Commissioner Bob Schumm said after reviewing credit card transaction fees. “That’s not very good.”

Well what's the ROI on the 30 million tax $$$$$ rec center going to be? Perhaps no ROI? City Hall has admitted there is no expected ROI.

Sometimes if the gate is malfunctioning the card issued at the gate will not open the barricade. Again voice of experience. It's difficult to back out with 3 cars behind wondering what the hell is going on.

At KU the other day I noticed a driver having problems getting the device to honor her credit card meanwhile I believe there were 4 cars waiting for the transaction to be approved. Imagine wanting to back out IF the gate refused to cooperate.

0

irvan moore 8 months, 1 week ago

interesting that mr. Corliss recommends an idea without getting the facts first

3

Richard Heckler 8 months, 1 week ago

Put parking meters in the new parking garage. Those credit card gates can create hassles when they decide not to work. City staff will need to be available almost immediately meanwhile patrons are busy deciding how to get out which is no fun. Voice of experience.

Think about if credit cards are rejected for whatever reason with cars lined up waiting to enter.

Meters in the previous lot did not prevent use. In fact it most always was full.

Why not meter all of the lots at 25 cents per hour. 50 cents for two hours of shopping is not a bad deal.

0

Richard Heckler 8 months, 1 week ago

Consider Text Amendment, TA-13-00106, to the City of Lawrence Land Development Code, Chapter 20, Articles 4 and 5, to permit the Accessory Dwelling Unit use as an accessory use in the RS5 (Single-Dwelling Residential) District. (PC Item 6; denied 6-0 on 7/22/13)

http://www.ci.lawrence.ks.us/assets/agendas/cc/2013/08-13-13/pl_ta-13-00106_communications.pdf

http://www.ci.lawrence.ks.us/assets/agendas/cc/2013/08-13-13/pl_ta-13-00106_july_minutes.pdf

Unanimously rejected a text amendment that would have allowed homeowners in Old West Lawrence and other RS-5 single-family zoned neighborhoods to build accessory dwelling units on their property. Several residents of single family neighborhoods expressed concern the amendment would make it easier to develop rental properties in single family neighborhoods.

Thank you city commission.

0

Steve Jacob 8 months, 1 week ago

The City Manager did not know how credit card companies make there money?

2

Paul Silkiner 8 months, 1 week ago

This is why SMART MONEY(Conservative)......gets ahead.........we do not quit working even though it is 1;27am..............the float on money is 24/7........WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www2.ljworld.com/users/photos/2013/aug/14/259918/

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.