Advertisement

Archive for Monday, June 28, 2010

CIA director offers mixed review of Afghanistan war

June 28, 2010

Advertisement

— The U.S. has driven al-Qaida into hiding and undermined its leadership, but is struggling to oust its primary sympathizer, the Taliban, from Afghanistan, the nation’s spymaster said Sunday.

CIA Director Leon Panetta’s assessment comes as President Barack Obama advances a risky new war plan that relies on 98,000 U.S. troops to prop up the Afghan government and prevent al-Qaida from returning. No longer overseeing the commander in chief’s mission is Gen. Stanley McChrystal, sacked this past week in a stunning shake-up in U.S. military leadership after his critical comments about the White House.

“We’re seeing elements of progress, but this is going to be tough,” Panetta told ABC’s “This Week.”

He said al-Qaida’s evolving attack strategy increasingly relies on operatives without any record of terrorism involvement or those already in the U.S. As for Osama bin Laden, Panetta said it’s been years since the U.S. had good intelligence about his whereabouts.

Assessing al-Qaida

Panetta estimated there are fewer than 100 al-Qaida militants operating inside Afghanistan, with the rest hiding along Pakistan’s mountainous western border. He said U.S. drone strikes and other spy operations have helped to “take down” half of al-Qaida’s senior leaders.

“We are engaged in the most aggressive operations in the history of the CIA in that part of the world, and the result is that we are disrupting their leadership,” Panetta said.

At the same time, Panetta offered a less upbeat assessment of the U.S. fight against the Taliban, the anti-U.S. insurgency operating inside Afghanistan’s borders.

When asked whether the Taliban has grown stronger since Obama took office, Panetta said the Taliban was acting more violent and being more aggressive in “going after our troops,” including its use of roadside bombs.

There is progress, he said, even if it’s “slower than I think anyone anticipated.”

As challenges in Afghanistan remain, the political clock is ticking. Many of Obama’s most ardent Democratic supporters on Capitol Hill have said they are wary that more U.S. troops and money can solve the problem.

Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said troops should begin pulling out in July 2011, as Obama promised, because the Afghans must get the message that they need to take responsibility for their country.

Levin, D-Mich., said he even would like to see a major military operation in Kandahar delayed until more Afghans can join the fight. He estimated fewer than 9,000 Afghan forces are operating in Kandahar — a fraction of those needed to take control of the city known as the Taliban’s spiritual heartland.

“If we want to succeed, the Afghans have got to succeed,” he said.

‘A tough fight’

Other Democrats suggested they are sympathetic to the complexities Obama faces.

The Taliban have “been running these areas for years now, and the idea we’re going to walk in and they’re going to run away, I think, was never contemplated,” said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. “This is a tough fight, unfortunately.”

Republicans said their biggest concern was that the 2011 deadline was set in stone. Obama has said troops will begin to pull out then, but that the pace and size of the withdrawal will depend upon conditions on the ground.

GOP Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, who’s influential on military matters, said his other major concern is the ailing effort by civilians to improve governance in Afghanistan.

One reason cited for McChrystal’s firing was the discord between him and his civilian advisers. Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command, has been named McChrystal’s replacement.

Graham said he wants to know whether Petraeus will work better with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Richard Holbrooke, who is special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

On a separate issue, Panetta said that the CIA had no choice but to hire the company once known as Blackwater for $100 million to provide security in Afghanistan.

Panetta said the company, now known as Xe Services, underbid others by $26 million and that a CIA review concluded that the contractor had cleaned up its act.

Blackwater guards are accused of opening fire on unarmed civilians in Baghdad in 2007, killing 17 people. A federal grand jury has indicted five Blackwater officials on conspiracy weapons and obstruction of justice charges.

Comments

Richard Heckler 3 years, 9 months ago

Let's not forget 7,000 dead soldiers that died protecting USA interests aka oil oil oil.

Believe me this war is NOT about democracy or women's rights.

0

Richard Heckler 3 years, 9 months ago

The war is a budget buster and has been from day one.

The dollar number we see most often is not the true cost of the war.

What is not put in print is the cost to taxpayers for the vets that are coming home disabled. Now we're talking about $4-$5 trillion and getting more expensive everyday. There is an estimated 30 plus thousand disabled soldiers.

0

Richard Heckler 3 years, 9 months ago

Do we want to bury the USA in arrogance and debt to other governments?

President Obama should have replaced Robert Gates on day one for brother Bob is a war monger. He'll never end the war. He is among the Bush familiy of politicians. Notice how the war has expanded instead of winding down.

Gates is running the war.

CIA Veteran: How Robert Gates Cooked the Intelligence

http://motherjones.com/politics/2006/12/cia-veteran-how-robert-gates-cooked-intelligence

In some home town meetings across the nation on Saturday sponsored by conservative republicans 51% of participants said cut defense spending. The meetings entitled "America Speaks - Our Budget Our Economy spoke very clear on this matter.

The dead bodies and trillions of dollars as a result of war need to stop!

Isn't it odd. The USA provided weapons to the Taliban to chase out Russia who wanted the same thing our war mongers want --- the oil.

So why is it okay for the USA to wage war on countries that did NOT attack the USA when it was NOT okay for Russia to wage war?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.