Senate vote kills public nursing legislation

? A bill giving women the right to breast-feed in public was killed Wednesday after several senators said private businesses should be allowed to prohibit breast-feeding on their premises.

“This is about private property rights,” said Sen. Kay O’Connor, R-Olathe.

O’Connor led a 20-14 vote to refer the proposal back to committee, a move the committee chairman and sponsor of the bill said killed the measure for the 2005 legislative session.

“We won’t have time to work the bill,” said Sen. Jim Barnett, R-Emporia, and chairman of the Public Health and Welfare Committee.

And Barnett said he wouldn’t support giving businesses the right to prohibit women from breast-feeding on their property.

“I believe allowing signage that says ‘No breast-feeding allowed’ becomes self-defeating. You become counterproductive to what you are trying to achieve,” he said.

The bill stated that it was the public policy of the state to encourage breast-feeding because of the health and nutritional benefits to infants. It also allowed mothers to breast-feed in any place they have a right to be. Thirty-two states have similar laws.

The impetus of the legislation came after a Lawrence woman was asked to stop breast-feeding her child while at a health club.

text Mothers say they want ‘discreet’ out of breast-feeding bill (03-15-05)text Bill protects breast-feeding but discreet wording a problem (03-12-05)<i>” border=”0″/> Breast-feeding bill advances, but changes unwelcome (2-24-05)</a><a href=</i>” border=”0″/> Research, legislation back breast-feeding advocates (2-09-05)</a><a href=<i>” border=”0″/> 6News video: Breast-feeding stats back Lawrence moms</a><a href=</i>” border=”0″/> Got Kids? blog: The LAC Breastfeeding Debacle Part II (07-14-04)</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<p>The measure was approved last month in the House after an amendment was added that mothers had to breast-feed “discreetly.”</p>
<p>Barnett’s committee removed “discreetly” from the bill. But when the measure hit the Senate floor, opponents said they didn’t believe the law was necessary.</p>
<p>Sen. Karin Brownlee, R-Olathe, said the measure originated from one complaint.</p>
<p>“When you are trying to fix one person’s issue, you are probably not doing the right thing,” she said.</p>
<p>O’Connor later said she breast-fed when her children were infants but she was worried that businesses, such as restaurants, should not be barred from preventing women from breast-feeding.</p>
<p>“I’m not against breast-feeding,” she said, but added, “If we didn’t have people who were being indiscreet we wouldn’t need to pass this law.”</p>
<p>O’Connor said she had on one occasion witnessed a breast-feeding woman whom she believed was indiscreet.</p>
<p>Of the Lawrence delegation, Sen. Marci Francisco, a Democrat, voted against putting the bill back in committee, and Sen. Roger Pine, a Republican, voted to send the measure back.</p>
<p>Pine said, “It is already the right of the mother to feed her child when it is needed.”</p>
<p>But when asked about the woman in Lawrence who was asked not to breast-feed, he said he was hesitant to respond because he didn’t know the details of the incident.</p>
<script type=