Advertisement

LJWorld.com weblogs Southern Perlo

Building Love at Ground Zero

Advertisement

Believers in Islam should not become America's whipping boys, and nor should the guilt from the attacks on 9/11 be assigned as collective guilt to all Muslims. As an African-American Southerner, I live and work near monuments that celebrate the Confederate legacy, hailing as heroes and valiant soldiers men who died for states' rights to continue the cruel and inhuman practices of slavery, including the December 1864 massacre of men, women, and children at Ebenezer Creek, outside of Savannah in Newt Ginrich's Georgia. (The loss of life by some estimates may have exceeded the 9/11 attacks.) I attend church with the direct descendants of those who once owned slaves. But I assign no collective or historic guilt to those whose current wealth and status derived in large part from this abominable practice.

The parallels are very similar--as are the lessons. I do understand the pain and deep hurt and visceral anger at the attack carried out by extremists who killed innocent friends and family members in the name of Islam. I pray often for those who hold in their hearts the heavy and unrelieved weight of their personal loss and sacrifice.

But I know the path of reconciliation and personal healing requires a strength of spirit rooted in love. The best way to honor the brave and wonderful souls we loss on 9/11 is to show the victory and triumph to that love. Sharing that love shows and affirms the very reasons we miss them so much and experience the loss so deeply.

It takes special courage to face those who share faith with those who struck such a devastating blow. But our collective and personal losses should not become a shrine to anger, resentment, hostility, or civil revenge. If the lives loss are to have full meaning, we cannot let ourselves become hostages to scorn and silent hatred. We cannot allow our hearts to be pulled along the same path as those who initiated the attacks. If we do, the terrorists have won.

On 9/11, my daughter worked in an office building directly across the street from one of the Towers, and was in the subway when the first plane hit, but was able to evacuate safely. I think often how glad I am to have her, and feel the guilt of the survivor for those who loss so much. Still, with due respect and honor to those who experienced the direct losses, I do not believe their memory is served by assigning collective guilt.

The politics of those angered by the request to build the mosque on Park Avenue are asserting that proximity is policy and are making an unspoken equivalency between the "hallowed ground" and the Giza settlements. "Location is power; seize and preserve the ground at all costs" is the mantra for supporters of both issues. Strength and might are being equated as "feel good" territorial imperatives.

The fact that this creates a subjugated class of citizens and rights is overlooked and disguised by arguments framed in emotional (insulting, demeaning, provocative, goading) and security (new source of possible attacks) terms. Please leave a comment!

Park Avenue, circa 1922, when the avenue consisted of a park. Top: The Lord's Prayer written in Arabic by a South Carolina Slave, Omar Ibn Said, a converted Presbyterian, 1857. Malcolm X Mosque, Harlem, New York. Images in the public domain.

Comments

overthemoon 2 years, 10 months ago

Excellent comments. In a time when we have so many huge problems that need everyone working together to find solutions, there is far to much focus on the small ways of defining 'the other'.

0

seriouscat 2 years, 10 months ago

Thank you for writing on this topic with such eloquence and sincerety. The number one thing missing from the debate thus far has been sensitvity and empathy from both sides (myself included). The picture of the slave's Lords Prayer is wonderful and such images do help to soften the emotions that drive inflammatory rhetoric.

One thing I have to ask though. Wouldn't you rather they take down those Confederate flags?

0

RogueThrill 2 years, 10 months ago

That was entirely to well thought out and written to appear at ljworld.com.

0

none2 2 years, 10 months ago

This is very well written and compassionate. It is much better than most of the syndicated columns that the LJWorld prints from both the left and the right.

That being said, while I do believe that they technically have a legal right to build what they want there, the question is whether it is the right thing to do. If a member or members of my family, my extended family, my neighborhood, my race, my religion, (or whatever way you can slice and dice humanity where I fall in the same group as the offending side) did a horrific crime in the recent past; I would want to do everything to distance myself from that crime and those people. I think that if most of us are truly honest with ourselves, we know that there are moderate Muslims that condemn the extremists. Those stories seldom make western media headlines. Which is a better headline for sales: "Average Joe Blow Muslim condemns extremists" or "Another Muslim issues a death fatwa and/or blows himself up"? Also because Islam doesn't have a central figure such as "pope", it becomes harder to gage officially where a faith truly stands on an issue.

Beyond condemning the behavior of extremists (which as stated I believe they do), I would make sure that anything that might be construed as being one of "them" was minimized by involving others that could never be considered one of "them". Specifically, in this case, I would have made an all faiths center where not only Muslims, but Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, Hindus, etc all equally were involved. I would also not name the center or the name of my organization after a name associated with dominance of "my" group over others. I would have chosen an all encompassing name.

What I've stated isn't meant to assign collective guilt, but rather to distance one's self from the appearance of association with the guilty. I think the following idiom holds true for most human beings as they cautiously grapple to accept a group where some of its members have wrought destruction: "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me."

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.