Blogs home Science Becoming Religion
We Cannot Abandon Afghanistan
Does the Obama administration understand why the U.S. invaded Afghanistan? Does Obama understand that the U.S. has no choice but to remain in Afghanistan until it can establish a stable government that will not allow the country to be a base for terrorism?
The Christian Science Monitor has reported that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told CNN it would be "irresponsible" to send more troops into Afghanistan before the political situation is resolved. Actually it would be irresponsible to wait for the political situation to be resolved before committing sufficient troops to stabilize the situation. http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1020/p02s07-usfp.html
The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 because the Taliban government of Afghanistan had allowed the country to be used by a group of al Qaeda terrorists who had attacked New York City and Washington, D.C., on September 11. The U.S. cannot afford to leave until it can be assured that the country has a government that will not allow the country to be used to stage any more attacks against the U.S.
Emanuel said it would be "reckless to make a decision on U.S. troop levels if, in fact, you haven't done a thorough analysis of whether, in fact, there's an Afghan partner ready to fill that space that the U.S. troops would create." http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/18/emanuel.afghanistan/index.html
Does Emanuel understand what the impact of Soviet rule followed by the rule of the Taliban? Both governments followed policies of discouraging, and in some cases eliminating, those who didn't blindly accept government orders.
The only people who had any experience operating a government were in the Taliban and they relied on terror to rule. Time will be required to find and train honest individuals who will not abuse their government positions.
Early volunteers for government service have often been dishonest, because dishonest people are more willing to take risks than honest people. It will be difficult to attract honest people until American forces can eliminate the violence that discourages them from getting involved.
If none of those who currently are interested in leading the government are capable of providing effective leadership, we will have to look for and develop new leaders. The U.S. may have to rebuild the country beginning at the local level.
Withdrawal before the country has a viable anti-terrorist government is not an option. Osama bin Laden would claim a major victory for violent Islam and use the victory to substantially increase recruitment.
Afghanistan is sometimes compared to my war [Vietnam] because it is a difficult place to defend against a guerrilla war. However, America's adversaries in Vietnam never attacked American cities or supported terror attacks on American cities. America's adversaries in Afghanistan have attacked American cities before and want to use the country as a base for future terrorist attacks against the United States and other countries.
American forces need to stay as long as it takes to prevent the country from once again becoming a base for terrorism even if that takes another 20 years. American forces are still based in Germany and Japan 64 years after the U.S. defeated them in World War II even though they are peaceful countries.
No one would suggest that police forces in American cities discontinue efforts to stop criminal street gangs just because efforts to stop them have not been completely successful. The police have to do whatever they can to limit gang activity so long as these gangs pose a threat.
The U.S. should not abandon efforts to limit the activities of international gangs of terrorists just because efforts to eliminate them have been unsuccessful. The U.S. and other nations have to do whatever is necessary to limit the activities of terrorist gangs and attempt to keep them from gaining secure bases from which to operate.
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 53 comments
- Anger control November 27, 2009 · 10 comments
- Kansas Athletics seeks football fans to invest $34M for Gridiron Club November 27, 2009 · 31 comments
- The Oread Hotel targets concerns over fire November 27, 2009 · 18 comments
- Santa arriving in Downtown Lawrence Friday night November 27, 2009 · 7 comments
- Shelter needed November 22, 2009 · 53 comments
- United Way support November 26, 2009 · 21 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 94 comments
- On the street: Are you a Black Friday shopper? November 27, 2009 · 21 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 95 comments
- The Oread Hotel targets concerns over fire November 27, 2009
- Center of attention: New LAC director acclimates to challenging post November 27, 2009
- Natural scorer: Xavier Henry used to carrying points load November 27, 2009
- Kansas Legislature likely to debate judicial nomination process in 2010 session November 25, 2009
- Tight credit slows state’s business development November 27, 2009
- Kansas Athletics seeks football fans to invest $34M for Gridiron Club November 27, 2009
- Jayhawks: We are focused on Tigers November 27, 2009
- Oread owners share view from the top September 24, 2009
- Message warns students at Perry-Lecompton not to attend class today April 20, 2007
- Santa arriving in Downtown Lawrence Friday night November 27, 2009


26 October 2009
at 6:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Wrong.
No ground troops are realy needed and all should be withdrawn as soon as possible.
Satellite and stealth technology can take care of suspected terrorist locations.
Barack Hussein Obama is not “fighting terrorism” in Afghanistan, he is merely supporting a Narcostate and murdering Americans.
We should withdraw immediately and he should be impeached.
26 October 2009
at 7:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
mario, does your 30 years of playing Stratego with a dog as your opponent really qualify you as an expert on military matters?
26 October 2009
at 7:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
autie (Anonymous) says…
Hold on snap, girlfriend is partly right. Nobody can win in Afganistan. Nobody. The British. The Russians. And anybody else that ever crossed that ground going back to Alexander. We will never have the ability to stabilize that country regardless of how many troops we send. It is nothing but a money pit.
26 October 2009
at 8:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
It is nothing but a death and money pit.
Neither Afghanistan,Iraq,Pakistan nor Iran have attacked our borders and cannot.
Face it the BUSHCO security team dropped the ball thus 9/11/01. And all of those 9/11/01 culprits had been in the USA for at least two years a few blocks away for NSA headquarters. Some had taken flight training in FLorida.
Bring the troops home and fire all of the 100,000 blood thirsty private army. Get them off the tax dollar payroll.
Why are we employing terrorists?
26 October 2009
at 8:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
justbegintowrite (Ronda Miller) says…
Al Qaeda terrorists are individuals the world over….they aren't an army hanging in formation in Afghanistan. How about Obama send troops to Chicago to stop the drug wars and deaths of innocent school children.? How about tightening security so we don't have to worry where in the world they are?
26 October 2009
at 10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Impeach Barack Hussein Obama now!