Blogs home Marion
Michelle Obama: Photoshop Anyone?
I find the evolution of images of Michelle Obama quite interesting.
Perhaps Max Factor was resurrected for this one!
What Michelle Obama was:
The Official White House portrait:
Michelle Obama on the cover of Glamour Magazine:
Top ads RSS
- Part-time CNA needed immediately to help our elderly clients in ...
- Tax Prep Help Wanted Full-time, Temporary Position for the 2009 ...
- PRODUCTION SHIRT PRESSER needed. Start at 7AM. 5 1/2 day ...
- Research Assistant KU Requires bachelor's degree in biochemistry, chemistry, molecular ...
- KU Informational Systems
Marketplace
Douglas County Visiting Nurses, Rehabilitation & Hospice Care 785-843-3738
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 114 comments
- One dead after car-motorcycle accident near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009 · 17 comments
- 3-step approach to health care reform November 27, 2009 · 21 comments
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 66 comments
- Anger control November 27, 2009 · 20 comments
- Kansas Athletics seeks football fans to invest $34M for Gridiron Club November 27, 2009 · 38 comments
- Fear tactics November 27, 2009 · 27 comments
- Poll: Have you ever attended school outside the United States? November 25, 2009 · 13 comments
- Letter claims bad conditions at juvenile facility November 27, 2009 · 17 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 98 comments
- Kansas Legislature likely to debate judicial nomination process in 2010 session November 25, 2009
- Santa arriving in Downtown Lawrence Friday night November 27, 2009
- Kansas Athletics seeks football fans to invest $34M for Gridiron Club November 27, 2009
- KU follows Cal financing game plan November 27, 2009
- Tight credit slows state’s business development November 27, 2009
- NFL roundup: Broncos back on track November 27, 2009
- Atomic veterans gaining recognition March 28, 2009
- Tennessee Tech coach thankful November 27, 2009
- Technology Association sets luncheon November 25, 2009
- Sprint completes purchase of Virgin Mobile November 25, 2009
30 October 2009
at 10:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RogueThrill (Anonymous) says…
Good lord she is gorgeous.
30 October 2009
at 11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RogueThrill (Anonymous) says…
But to answer your question: I am pretty sure the second picture differs in skin tone due to differences in lighting. The first picture is from a large, open venue while the second one was done in a closed room and set up (no doubt meticulously).
The third picture is likely airbrushed and, perhaps, photoshopped. All fashion magazines do it and it was not likely done under anyone from the whitehouses request.
Still, she is gorgeous in every photo.
30 October 2009
at 11:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jaywalker (Anonymous) says…
Beautiful woman.
And Marion, why do you post these sorts of things? Is it just a sadistic thrill you get from prodding people? Saw the headline and knew it was you. Considering the trend of your entries and how so many consider them, that can't be a good thing. You know this, obviously, so why?
30 October 2009
at 11:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
jaywalker (Anonymous) says…
Beautiful woman.
And Marion, why do you post these sorts of things? Is it just a sadistic thrill you get from prodding people? Saw the headline and knew it was you. Considering the trend of your entries and how so many consider them, that can't be a good thing. You know this, obviously, so why?
________________________________________________
I am pretty sure you know the answer to your question.
Definition of Marion= Marion. That is who he is and what he is.
30 October 2009
at 11:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
spiff (Anonymous) says…
Sad old man is sad.
30 October 2009
at 11:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“RogueThrill (Anonymous) says…
The third picture is likely airbrushed and, perhaps, photoshopped. All fashion magazines do it and it was not likely done under anyone from the whitehouses request.”
Marion writes:
I did not mention the White House or imply any White House influence on the properties of the image but your post has proven my point.
Thank you!
30 October 2009
at 11:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RogueThrill (Anonymous) says…
I did not mention the White House or imply any White House influence on the properties of the image but your post has proven my point.
Thank you!
==========
I doubt that because you really don't have a point to make.
31 October 2009
at 12:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Newsflash!
Women wear different makeup and clothes depending on the occasion.
Quick! Contact all the major new outlets! This is BIG!
31 October 2009
at 12:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RogueThrill (Anonymous) says…
The more salient issue is that magazines airbrush people they shoot.
it reminds one of the Sarah Palin/Newsweek boondoggle where they had a close up of her face on the cover and, instead of airbrushing the photo, they decided to show her crater sized pores.
31 October 2009
at 12:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ReadingSports (Anonymous) says…
Send in the trolls!
Here's a new blog. Marion abandons all civilized or polite behavior.
Oh, wait, too late. Marion, everyone knows you have a problem with the current president, but really. Give it a rest. Try focusing on the issues. Why are you worried about whether or not Glamour magazine uses Photoshop, DUH!
Or maybe you're just more interested, in playing monkey in a zoo and flinging senseless poop.
Besides, don't you think that an official portrait of the First Lady should be complimentary? I do, no matter what I think of President Obama and his policies.
31 October 2009
at 1:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“ReadingSports (Anonymous) says…
“Besides, don't you think that an official portrait of the First Lady should be complimentary? I do, no matter what I think of President Obama and his policies.”
Marion writes:
As I indicated in the original blog post, it is not the Official Portrait with which I have an issue.
31 October 2009
at 1:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
Shades of grey and context…
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia…
( Yes, the marked tiles next to the red cylinder are the *same* color. )
31 October 2009
at 9:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ReadingSports (Anonymous) says…
First picture is a candid shot. From a distance with telephoto lens with available light.
Last picture is in a studio with a portrait photographer.
Apples and oranges. No evolution taking place. I'm sure that if a photographer showed up at your house and took a set portrait of you, it would look better than a candid shot with a long lens and you didn't know that your picture was being taken. She is also not a 'natural' model like Barak that always seems to know that he is on 'stage'.
31 October 2009
at 10:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
honeychild (Mel Briscoe) says…
she looks fabulous in all 3 pictures. so glad we have a beautiful black woman representing our country as first lady! :)
31 October 2009
at 10:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Sad old man grabbing at straws again.
31 October 2009
at 10:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Irish (Irish Swearingen) says…
I agree with Katara and Mel. The first family are so real and the inaugural dance was so wonderful. They were like two high school kids at the prom.
She is very beautiful in a very human way, and it is easy to tell that when she is with people she is much more interested in communicating and helping then in thinking about her looks.
Too bad there isn't a picture of her at the World Series game in the baseball jacket.
31 October 2009
at 11:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RoeDapple (Anonymous) says…
Ya know, all ya gotta do is ask….
http://static.thehollywoodgossip.com/…
31 October 2009
at 11:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Oh come now Marion, let America obsess. Glad I couldn't give a flying fig about Michele Obama.
31 October 2009
at 11:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sinkorswim (Anonymous) says…
As all three photos show, she's a beautiful woman! I haven't bought a Glamour magazine in years, but I'll get this one just 'cause she's on the front!
31 October 2009
at 11:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hellsbasement (Anonymous) says…
mmmm…I love the smell of a backfire in the morning.
thanks for posting beautiful pictures of the First Lady of The United States of America!
31 October 2009
at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunny (Anonymous) says…
A beautiful woman? Yuk…You all need to have your eyes examined for sure!
And Mel….a 'beautiful black woman representing our country'?
That is so laughable. Remember? She's never been proud to be an american!
You people have something wrong with you and all need glasses if you think she is beautiful, inside or out!
31 October 2009
at 11:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
puddleglum (Anonymous) says…
where's snap on this one?
31 October 2009
at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Irish (Irish Swearingen) says…
Thanks Roe, I loved the picture though I am rather put out with her for kissing a Yankee.
The Phillies are going to defeat the evil empire.
Her husband is a White Sox fan as I recall.
31 October 2009
at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KansasPerson (Anonymous) says…
Marion writes:
“As I indicated in the original blog post, it is not the Official Portrait with which I have an issue.”
Marion, you didn't write enough in your original blog post to indicate anything in particular. I really don't have any idea what you're trying to say.
31 October 2009
at 12:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
HenryPeach (Matt Needham) says…
I think I see what you mean. In the first photo the light falls on Michelle's left side, but in the the second two it's from the center. Obama is trying to socialize light itself!!!
31 October 2009
at 1:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
prolifersforwar (Anonymous) says…
no more stories glamourizing how beautiful michelle obama is. this is a liberal puff piece
31 October 2009
at 1:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
No “backfire” here.
It's obvious that during the photoshopping, they even changed the height/width ratio of her face.
Take a close look.
31 October 2009
at 1:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
porch_person (Anonymous) says…
Marion Lynn needs attention again.
With this post, I feel I've done my part.
31 October 2009
at 2:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ShePrecedes (Anonymous) says…
How could that be any worse than the wig that Laura Bush always wore??? That thing was ghastly! Surely she had better real hair than that wig.
I don't generally pick on Laura because I feel such deep sympathy for her.
31 October 2009
at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
I don't see much difference in any of the pictures. But to be honest, I don't find her nearly as attractive as the media seems to.
31 October 2009
at 3:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
toe (Anonymous) says…
Don't care. Do care about her husband's policies.
31 October 2009
at 3:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Me too toe. This president has done about everything he said he wouldn't do and hardly anything he said he would do. Liar, fraud, radical, incompetent, Chicago style……like I said all along. And Pelosi and Reid? They all are perfect compliments to one another.
Everyone happy?
31 October 2009
at 4:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
Every day, LJW gets a little more like river*itytalks.
31 October 2009
at 4:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
puddleglum (Anonymous) says…
ah, there you are, snap.
I was worried.
31 October 2009
at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tumbilweed (Anonymous) says…
“…I have an issue.” - Marion
An?
31 October 2009
at 4:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Marion, you take a beating when you blog about the Obamas. Like you, I will never like them occupying the white house. There's nothing we can do about it for 3 years and 3 months. They'll be gone before you know it.
31 October 2009
at 5:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“tumbilweed (Anonymous) says…
“…I have an issue.” - Marion
An?”
Marion writes:
“An, what?”
Or are you confused about the use of the word “an”?
Allow me to retort:
“a + singular noun beginning with a consonant: a boy; a car; a bike; a zoo; a dog
an + singular noun beginning with a vowel: an elephant; an egg; an apple; an idiot; an orphan
a + singular noun beginning with a consonant sound: a user (sounds like 'yoo-zer,' i.e. begins with a consonant 'y' sound, so 'a' is used); a university; a unicycle
In some cases where “h” is pronounced, such as “historical,” us an:
An historical event is worth recording.”
Marion further writes:
'mkay?
31 October 2009
at 6:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hellsbasement (Anonymous) says…
'mkay? is that ok? or okay?
watch southpark much.
i love the smell of hypocrisy in the evening.
31 October 2009
at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Of course I watch South Park!
Doesn't everyone?
31 October 2009
at 6:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgiahawk (Anonymous) says…
Am I missing something? Like a point to this?
Is this part of the six degrees of separation between Obama and communism conspiracy?
31 October 2009
at 7:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“georgiahawk (Anonymous) says…
Am I missing something? Like a point to this?”
Marion writes:
Yes, you are missing a point.
Try figuring it out.
31 October 2009
at 7:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Of course I watch South Park!
Doesn't everyone?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How funny! The sad old man is trying so hard to be young and hip.
South Park jumped the shark years ago.
31 October 2009
at 7:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“tumbilweed (Anonymous) says…
“…I have an issue.” - Marion
An?”
Marion writes:
“An, what?”
Or are you confused about the use of the word “an”?
Allow me to retort:
“a + singular noun beginning with a consonant: a boy; a car; a bike; a zoo; a dog
an + singular noun beginning with a vowel: an elephant; an egg; an apple; an idiot; an orphan
a + singular noun beginning with a consonant sound: a user (sounds like 'yoo-zer,' i.e. begins with a consonant 'y' sound, so 'a' is used); a university; a unicycle
In some cases where “h” is pronounced, such as “historical,” us an:
An historical event is worth recording.”
Marion further writes:
'mkay?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh the grammar nazi emerges but fails to get the joke.
Sad old man is sad.
31 October 2009
at 8:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
It is so apropo that the image of Michelle is photo-shopped time and time again to create a mythically perfect female. How can a mythical god be married to anything less?
31 October 2009
at 8:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“Katara (Anonymous) says…
Oh the grammar nazi emerges but fails to get the joke.
Sad old man is sad.”
Marion writes:
OK; what is the joke?
And I'm far from “sad”, Sweetie!
And in fact, tonight I'm pretty happy!
What is your problem?
31 October 2009
at 8:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“Godot (Anonymous) says…
It is so apropo that the image of Michelle is photo-shopped time and time again to create a mythically perfect female. How can a mythical god be married to anything less?”
Marion writes:
Niiicccccccccccceeeeeeeeeeee post!
“Chimera”, anyone?
31 October 2009
at 9:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
verity (Anonymous) says…
OMG, the FIrst Lady of the United States is wearing a leopard costume tonight while she and the President stimulate America's children with sugar laden handouts. Stupid, lazy no good children, just going around asking for handouts and expecting to get free candy. And if you give it to them, they will just come back for more next year. They need to get jobs and buy their own candy. What a bunch of losers.
It's a conspiracy, I say, a conspiracy, to make our children hyper so they will take more meds and become a bunch of zombies and never get jobs.
31 October 2009
at 9:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“Katara (Anonymous) says…
Oh the grammar nazi emerges but fails to get the joke.
Sad old man is sad.”
Marion writes:
OK; what is the joke?
And I'm far from “sad”, Sweetie!
And in fact, tonight I'm pretty happy!
What is your problem?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm sure you are happy. I have no doubt that the Grey Goose is getting ready for takeoff. I'm sure that always makes you happy in anticipation of the oblivion you will soon be in.
Marion has an issue. An issue. Just *an* issue.
Most people on here would disagree with your use of the singular.
Dense old man is dense.
31 October 2009
at 9:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFjVbi…
Marion thanks you for flying Grey Goose Airlines. Enjoy your flight!
31 October 2009
at 10:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
slowplay (Anonymous) says…
My God… What an idiotic post. Marion, if you keep this up the doctor is going to suspend your internet privileges.
31 October 2009
at 11:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jaywalker (Anonymous) says…
Um, paaaaaawdon,
ahem…..'scuse
but….I kinda asked…why?
1 November 2009
at 12:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
gl0ck0wn3r (Anonymous) says…
Not sure what the point is with this blog post. Is it surprising to you that various publications use different techniques to shoot and edit photographs? I can certainly tell you as someone with education in photography and professional experience that all three photos were photoshopped but for different effect. The first is a news photograph and - assuming an ethical photographer - the goal would be simple corrections of technical failings. The second is a portrait shot in very controlled lighting and photoshop would be used to correct technical failings and probably any minor cosmetic issues. The third would - again - be shot with very controlled lighting and would probably be the most heavily edited for cosmetic issues without any editorial constraint. As for height/width issues: that is more likely the result of lens choices. Long lenses compress, short and wide lenses distort. One doesn't need photoshop to do that.
1 November 2009
at 1:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
parrothead8 (Anonymous) says…
No way! A famous woman has three pictures taken at three different times, and she looks slightly different in all three? I've never heard of such a thing!
Somebody alert the CIA, Fox News, and Michael Moore. We need an investigation into this mystifying issue on all fronts.
1 November 2009
at 1:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jimmyjms (Anonymous) says…
The former narc and failed business owner demonstrates why these facts are so.
1 November 2009
at 1:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
toe (Anonymous) says…
Obama is dividing this country. But, I believe even he is being marched ahead of a mob. I am beginning to believe the problem is rich verses poor. The mob sees unending inequities. I could be wrong, but the mob is growing. I for one, do not think the answer is dismantling free enterprise, but I do believe the problem of wealth dispersion must be addressed. Otherwise, angry mobs will act even against their own best interests. Higher taxes, more regulation, more government will kill their future faster and with more permanency than wealth disparity. Could it be that neither party sees the mob?
1 November 2009
at 7:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hellsbasement (Anonymous) says…
yesterday I did yard work with my spouse, enjoying the company and the weather. I had a few Shiner Blacks, and took time for a cigar with my neighbor while discussing an upcoming street repair project.
We took our daughter and her friends trick or treating and enjoyed seeing all the little goblins laughing and having fun.
Had a fire in the pit, read some college football scores and went to bed.
What I did not do is sit around worrying about if pictures of the First Lady of my country had been photoshopped. Matter of fact it never crossed my mind. My children stood on jackolantern lined porches with many other races waiting for that snickers bar and I doubt that any of them cared about the pictures either. You see, children are not born to hate. They are taught hate and racism by us, the adults they look up to to guide them.
My point is this…how long will the LJWorld allow Marion and his constant spread of hate and racism post on this site? Oh he hides it well and he will deny it…but look close it is there.Not only does this site support Marion and his beliefs, they put his face on the front page. It has been suggested that his posts drive up the comment count resulting in more advertising. I do not know if this is true, Kealing has denied this rumor multiple times.
Our children are 13 and 10. We try not to let the younger see Marions comments and our 13 year old son just reads them and laughs. He knows a racist fool when he sees one.
And what a fool he is.
1 November 2009
at 7:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
“How can a mythical god be married to anything less?” -Godot
Mythical? Not to the left. Obama is a real life Messiah. He was able to put the Clintons, the former god and goddess of the left, at the back of the line.
“Chicago, Chicago, I'll show you around….”
1 November 2009
at 7:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RiverCityConservative (Anonymous) says…
Finally, grace and class in the White House again.
1 November 2009
at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgiahawk (Anonymous) says…
I figured out what this blog is about! the photo's were manipulated just like Chevez manipulates his people and Mao manipulated his people. So now the six degrees between Obama and communism is down to four, Obama to Michelle to chevez to mao and communism.
Or maybe it is the one degree of separation between Marion and his brain! Which is, unfortunately, enough of a separation to give us this stupid blog.
1 November 2009
at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
repaste (Anonymous) says…
C'mon Tom, we know your still pining for Bristol and Sarah -” …Gov. of Alaska, Sarah Palin–hottie WOW!! What a hottie–you go Sarah Hot Dang….what a smokin' hot and articulate, wonderful lady. She's only human– a very sexy human. 8-inch sausage hehehe
1 November 2009
at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Irish (Irish Swearingen) says…
We have a handsome President, a beautiful first lady and the children are cute and smart. And, then there is the dog.
The country has survived worse.
These two are very smart, focused and competent and knowledgeable. Do not underestimate either one of them.
1 November 2009
at 10:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Boosh (Anonymous) says…
Photoshop Anyone?
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2009/j…
1 November 2009
at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tumbilweed (Anonymous) says…
Thanks Katara!
1 November 2009
at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
9070811 (Anonymous) says…
There is a downward angle and casting shadows in the first photo. Everything is photoshopped…does that matter?
1 November 2009
at 12:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Boosh (Anonymous) says…
Photoshop Anyone?
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2009/j…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh that is most definitely photoshopped. As proof, take a look at this other picture taken earlier and notice the differences!
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2005/j…
Obviously the old man jowls were completely removed from the link you posted Boosh. And what's up with the hands as big as his head? Does he have a case of Ann Coulter hands?
1 November 2009
at 1:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Boosh (Anonymous) says…
Photoshop Anyone?
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2009/j…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh that is most definitely photoshopped. As proof, take a look at this other picture taken earlier and notice the differences!
http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2005/j…
Obviously the old man jowls were completely removed from the link you posted Boosh. And what's up with the hands as big as his head? Does he have a case of Ann Coulter hands?
_______________________________________________
That picture must have been taken before he gave up trying to be the stunt double for Boss Hogg on Dukes of Hazard.
1 November 2009
at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hellsbasement (Anonymous) says…
did anyone else hear that loud bang?
I am going to guess “backfire.”
1 November 2009
at 3:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rbwaa (Anonymous) says…
Like others on this forum I knew before looking that this blog was by marion. Additionally, I knew that it was another ‘veiled attempt’ to promote racist views by vociferously denying his own racist views.
I think marion loves being called racist so he can SHOUT back that he is *not racist* while at the same time demonstrating he *is racist*!
1 November 2009
at 3:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RoeDapple (Anonymous) says…
I like photoshop…
http://tommychristopher.files.wordpre…
I mean, what's not to like?…
http://static.open.salon.com/files/sa…
I mean I really like photoshop…
http://themerchantmaven.com/wordpress…
Really, really like photoshop….
http://thecount.com/wp-content/upload…
Don't you?…
http://online.wsj.com/media/sarah_pal…
1 November 2009
at 3:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hitme (Anonymous) says…
Oh yeah, she's hot…
like Elenore Roosevelt was hot
1 November 2009
at 3:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Boston_Corbett (Anonymous) says…
worth repeating:
____________
rbwaa (Anonymous) says…
Like others on this forum I knew before looking that this blog was by marion. Additionally, I knew that it was another ‘veiled attempt’ to promote racist views by vociferously denying his own racist views.
I think marion loves being called racist so he can SHOUT back that he is *not racist* while at the same time demonstrating he *is racist*!
1 November 2009
at 6:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Irish (Irish Swearingen) says…
Roe, you are a marvel. Like Brett Farve you are a true American original.
Michele Obama is beautiful is a real way. She is in a position to teach black girls that you can be strong, smart and still be lovely. Black girls as well as boys need role models right now.
The media tends to dwell on the blacks who are underclass and being what they are it just serves them right.
The Obamas are proof positive that this is not so. There are good, stable black families who are raising their children the right way.
We should not lose sight of the real issue here. It is not about being a cover girl, it is about being a woman who is beautiful because the strength of her soul shines forth.
1 November 2009
at 6:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Multidisciplinary (Anonymous) says…
Brett Favre! You got that closer than you know.
A few lighter moments with Brett.(and others..roll the credits please..)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBICR2…
1 November 2009
at 7:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
thebcman (Anonymous) says…
hellsbasement nailed it.
the Sad Old Man can't stand the fact that a black man is running his beloved country.
1 November 2009
at 7:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RoeDapple (Anonymous) says…
Brett Farve? Yeah, with a little photoshop I guess I look a little like him. Waddayathink?
http://www.lolitafiles.com/uploaded_i…
1 November 2009
at 7:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mom_of_three (Anonymous) says…
different angle on the first picture in the blog, so you really can't compare anything.
But I wish I looked that good at her age.
1 November 2009
at 9:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
mom-of_three, all you need to look that good at her age is photoshop and the collaboration of the mainstream media.
Your right to be that beautiful should be included with your government run health care plan. Photoshop and botox for all! hmmm, hmmm!! You, too, deserve to be perfect and beautiful in every image taken of you. It is your right! I am sure the Constitution guarantees this. You go for it, girl! Demand what you deserve.
3 November 2009
at 3 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AnnaUndercover (Anonymous) says…
Michelle Obama is as gorgeous as she is brilliant.