Blogs home Marion
Dynamite Peace Prize to Barack Hussein Obama?
Which of the following images might most accurately display why Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Dynamite Peace Prize, I wonder:
Barack Hussein Obama tells us that he has been to 57 (Fifty-Seven) states:
What Barack Hussein Obama wants to do with YOUR money in his own words:
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Woods hurt in accident November 28, 2009 · 2 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 104 comments
- Woman sees image of Jesus on her iron November 28, 2009 · 23 comments
- Fear tactics November 27, 2009 · 38 comments
- Black Friday shoppers get early, cheap jump on gifts November 28, 2009 · 9 comments
- Survey: Pavement conditions improving November 28, 2009 · 11 comments
- One dead after car-motorcycle accident near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009 · 32 comments
- Season salvager? Jayhawks say win today could ease sting of season November 28, 2009 · 12 comments
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 73 comments
- Downtown lights up with holiday spirit, Santa Claus November 28, 2009 · 8 comments
- One dead after car-motorcycle accident near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009
- SNL actor in ‘House' November 28, 2009
- For Markieff Morris, the screen’s the thing November 28, 2009
- Progress comes slowly in processing disability claims March 15, 2009
- Papa does preach: Call to ministry can run in the family November 28, 2009
- ‘It’s about time’ November 28, 2009
- Woman sees image of Jesus on her iron November 28, 2009
- Season salvager? Jayhawks say win today could ease sting of season November 28, 2009
- ‘Cash for Appliances’ due to start soon November 28, 2009
- Haskell women improve to 11-2 November 28, 2009
11 October 2009
at 2:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
denak (Anonymous) says…
Ahhhhhh, racism at its best!
11 October 2009
at 3:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas_opines (Anonymous) says…
Careful, dena, you might be accused of adding nothing to the forum but personal attacks.
/from one that would know.
11 October 2009
at 3:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
What's that sound I hear from the direction of Wyandotte County?
“
look
at
me
,
look
at
me
!
“
Still
having
a
wonderful
internet
life
,
which
has
not
gone
unnoticed
.
11 October 2009
at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
Marion has like mad copy and paste skills with images.
A picture is worth a thousand whines.
11 October 2009
at 3:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
lctchr1 (Anonymous) says…
wow.
11 October 2009
at 4:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And which of the images are “racist”, please?
They all appear to be political in nature to me.
11 October 2009
at 4:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“lctchr1 (Anonymous) says…
wow.”
Marion writes:
“Wow”, what?
11 October 2009
at 4:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mom_of_three (Anonymous) says…
socialism - please. hardly. we are not any closer to socialism now than when social security, medicare, wpa and such during FDR were enacted?
What would McCain be doing differently?
11 October 2009
at 4:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
Marion You don't really need to use photo shop pictures. The Obama problems speak loud and clear on their own. The criteria for the Pulitzer has be on the downslide for awhile. Remember Al Gore won it too.
11 October 2009
at 4:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“mom_of_three (Anonymous) says…
What would McCain be doing differently?”
Marion writes:
Red Herring and not material to the discussion.
(1) The posted question concerns which of the images might have influenced the presentation of the Dynamite Prize to Barack Hussein Obama.
(2) I have not asked what McCain would be doing and there is no way to know. In anycase, Barack Hussein Obama is both the president and recipient of the Dynamite Prize, so could you curtail your efforts at spin, control your attention issues and stick to the subject?
11 October 2009
at 5:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
“…so could you curtail your efforts at spin, control your attention issues and stick to the subject?”
I (heart) mario when he's being all imperious & stern & stuff.
11 October 2009
at 5:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
notjustastudent (Anonymous) says…
The pulitzer? Maybe you should figure out what you're talking about before you open your mouth…
Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize as leader of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, not as himself. The Panel was who really won, that's why it's listed first.
And by the way, whatever problems he has created in the US have no bearing on why he was selected for this prize, because believe it or not, there are other things going on in the world besides what's happening in the US. So I guess the best picture would be the one of him meeting with foreign leaders, since that's the kind of thing the prize is awarded for.
11 October 2009
at 5:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“notjustastudent (Anonymous) says…
So I guess the best picture would be the one of him meeting with foreign leaders, since that's the kind of thing the prize is awarded for.”
Marion writes:
You mean the one in which Barack Hussein Obama is shown bowing down to and kissing the ring of a Saudi Prince?
Fourth one down?
That one?
Theone in which a sitting US President kowtows to Islamic royalty?
That one?
11 October 2009
at 6:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
staff04 (Anonymous) says…
You're right Marion! He should have shoved a thumb in that muslin bastard's eye, right? The whole world would have been so proud of the US and their principles.
Cheeses you're a moron. Just keep in mind while you happily defend your disgusting and grossly overt racism…you don't get to write your obituary (or, if you prefer, what history will think of you).
11 October 2009
at 6:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize, and Marion lifted a bunch of pictures from other websites to vent his anger. Urgh! There, that sure showed him who is boss!
urgh! = boo hoo (for those who didn't catch on)
11 October 2009
at 6:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
porch_person (Anonymous) says…
Snap nailed this one. This is Marion crying for attention,……again.
11 October 2009
at 6:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jumpin_catfish (Anonymous) says…
More and more I am convinced that Obama and Co. are about weakening our country in every way they can whereby making we the people completely dependent on big government and destroying the republic. Hope springs eternal though, mid-term elections in 2010 can reverse this hellish mistake the voters made in Nov. 08.
11 October 2009
at 6:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Just Marion going about his usual business…
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/3400/f…
11 October 2009
at 7 p.m.
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
11 October 2009
at 7:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
corduroypants (Anonymous) says…
rtichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
“…The criteria for the Pulitzer has be on the downslide for awhile. Remember Al Gore won it too.”
This is classic. Please tell us more…
11 October 2009
at 7:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
corduroypants (Anonymous) says…
“lctchr1 (Anonymous) says…
wow.”
Marion writes:
“Wow”, what?
===========
Wow, you're completely retarded.
11 October 2009
at 7:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
Tom, the Constitution is an imperfect document. If it were perfect, why do we have amendments?
11 October 2009
at 7:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Boosh (Anonymous) says…
I do so get a bang out of him winning.
11 October 2009
at 10:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
yeah cord Obama is up for a grammy too. They say his performance as an american is a block buster.
12 October 2009
at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Denak wrote:
“denak (Anonymous) says…
Ahhhhhh, racism at its best!”
Marion then wrote:
“Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And which of the images are “racist”, please?
They all appear to be political in nature to me.”
Marion further writes:
And no reply from Denak, who is fond of hitting and running after having tossed out the race card!
LOL!
12 October 2009
at 12:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“corduroypants (Anonymous) says…
“lctchr1 (Anonymous) says…
wow.”
Marion writes:
“Wow”, what?
===========
Wow, you're completely retarded.”
Marion writes:
Thank you , corduroypants for your valuable and significant input to this thread.
With that kind of input to your credit, no wonder you are “anonymous”.
12 October 2009
at 12:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
corduroypants (Anonymous) says…
Interesting. Almost as valuable and significant as you finding images on the internet (none of which you created) and writing a “blog” that has no relevance to anything - especially humor?
12 October 2009
at 12:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“corduroypants (Anonymous) says…
Interesting. Almost as valuable and significant as you finding images on the internet (none of which you created) and writing a “blog” that has no relevance to anything - especially humor?”
Marin writes:
Sour grapes, there , corduroypants or area you just upset that your Messiah is under scrutiny?
12 October 2009
at 12:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bad_dog (Anonymous) says…
Q: “Which of the following images might most accurately display why Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Dynamite Peace Prize, I wonder:”
A: None, but I'm begining to attribute your constant fixation on Obama to a *man crush*. Perhaps using a picture of Obama riding a bicycle with his kids, or the one of him throwing out the first pitch in his *Mommy* jeans would be more persuasive…
Oh, and that trillion dollar bill with the serial #:
*bho1sev1l666* is really scary. You might want to delete that photo out of concern for younger readers.
“Thank you , corduroypants for your valuable and significant input to this thread.
With that kind of input to your credit, no wonder you are “anonymous”.”
You reap what you sow. If you ever put anything valuable or significant on this or any other thread, it will be the first time. We would all be better served IMHO were you to be a little more *anonymous*.
Let me start your response for you:
bad_dog says: ” “
Marion writes: “ ”
Yawn…..
12 October 2009
at 12:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Yea but bad_dog, you replied…………………………..
12 October 2009
at 1:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ReadingSports (Anonymous) says…
Not really sure what anyone is trying to accomplish here, other than feeding the trolls, of couse, which includes the original post. Yea, conservatives don't like The Chosen One. Yea Liberals like the The Chosen One. Liberals don't like conservatives, since we're racists and all. Conservatives don't like liberals, because they're…. liberals. :-)
Obama Bless you!
12 October 2009
at 1:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bad_dog (Anonymous) says…
“Yea but bad_dog, you replied…………………………..”
Yea but Marion, you just exposed your true motive for posting this tripe. Not to post something *valuable or significant* as you chided others for above, nor to blog about something informative or educational-just to be a petulant, hypocritical - ahh, never mind.
LJW, let the countdown to Marion's one millionth comment begin!
12 October 2009
at 1:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tbaker (Anonymous) says…
Denak…yet another person who doesn't own a dictionary. No doubt a product of the government school system.
Marion….ah…kinda at a loss here. Wazzup with this foolishness? Is there a point? The Prez got the award cause the lefties in Europe like him. You didn't know that?
Bad dog - LMAO!
12 October 2009
at 2:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“tbaker (Anonymous) says…
Denak…yet another person who doesn't own a dictionary. No doubt a product of the government school system.
Marion….ah…kinda at a loss here. Wazzup with this foolishness? Is there a point? The Prez got the award cause the lefties in Europe like him. You didn't know that?
Bad dog - LMAO!”
Marion writes:
Oh, yeah!
“Bad dog!
No biscuit!”
12 October 2009
at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
They don't like pundrity around here unless it is from someone like that big fat idiot Michael Moore.
You know…
The guy worth over $300 million who now decries and denigrates the capitalist system that allowed him to become so wealthy?
12 October 2009
at 2:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Jonathan Kealing,
I just noticed my post was removed from 7 pm last night. Why? Especially considering the content of this blog and other posts. Please cite what rule I violated. Did you get a 'suggest removal', or just remove it?
Thank You,
Tom Shewmon
12 October 2009
at 2:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
Why don't image copyright laws apply to blogs?
Tom, I don't recall your having written anything outrageous either — certainly not more so than your usual posts. Your logic was flawed, of course, but it wasn't offensive. Sometimes we know why these things happen, and sometimes we don't. Shake it off.
12 October 2009
at 3:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
brujablanco (Anonymous) says…
Marion, your confusion lies in the fact that Obama is not under scrutiny for receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, or as your wise sidekick calls it, the Pulitzer. This award is premature, but the fault lies with the committee not our president.
As for your calling this “pundrity” (sic) - thanks for the Monday laugh.!!!! Might I remind you of the definition?
pun·dit (pndt)
n.
1. A source of opinion; a critic: a political pundit.
2. A learned person.
3. Hinduism Variant of pandit.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––—
[Hindi pait, learned man, from Sanskrit paita, learned, scholar, perhaps of Dravidian origin.]
punditry
n
the expressing of expert opinions
12 October 2009
at 3:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jimmyjms (Anonymous) says…
What's the point of this, Marion?
You're a cry-baby that needs a ton of attention.
Shouldn't you get a job, or become a “junior spy” - get back in touch with your Narc roots?
Jonathan Kealing - WTF, man? This is pathetic.
12 October 2009
at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jimmyjms (Anonymous) says…
“You know…
The guy worth over $300 million who now decries and denigrates the capitalist system that allowed him to become so wealthy?”
Hmmm…there's a thought: try being successful at something and maybe people would care what you have you to say?
12 October 2009
at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Heh, heh.
12 October 2009
at 3:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jimmyjms (Anonymous) says…
And now Marion has accomplished what he set out to do.
12 October 2009
at 3:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
Shouldn't
this
all
be
over
at
river*itytalks
,
mario
?
Of
course
nobody
would
ever
see
it
there
.
12 October 2009
at 3:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Cappy (Anonymous) says…
Maybe not racist, but certainly paranoid and stupid.
Come to think of it, that's what racism is, too.
12 October 2009
at 3:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And just how has Barack Hussein Obama aided the cause of Whirled Peas?
Let us count the ways…………………………………..
12 October 2009
at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bad_dog (Anonymous) says…
“And just how has Barack Hussein Obama aided the cause of Whirled Peas?”
Well, there haven't been any Predator drone strikes over Wyandotte County lately, now have there?
Is this really your Facebook page, Marion?
http://www.facebook.com/people/Marion…
12 October 2009
at 4:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Sorry, rabid_dog; I don't have a facebook page but you keep huntin' if it makes you feel good.
12 October 2009
at 5:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
puddleglum (Anonymous) says…
marion, why did you not ever attack george w. hussein bush when he was in office?
12 October 2009
at 5:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
“Linking Kent
Four Kent artists have collaborated on an exhibition that looks at the cultural similarities and contrasts between Kent and Northern France. The exhibition includes painting, printmaking and photography by Marion Lynn, Mary Chaplin, Liz Garnett and Donna Hawkes-Baines. — Ashford, United Kingdom”
http://www.wwar.com/categories/Online…
12 October 2009
at 5:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tbaker (Anonymous) says…
Do you mean Bush and Obama are related! Small world.
12 October 2009
at 5:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rbwaa (Anonymous) says…
why isn't there a “suggest removal” button for blogs??
12 October 2009
at 6:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Hmmm…. maybe google search hits ARE indicative of importance!
http://www.google.com/search?q=Marion…
Results 1 - 10 of about 9,350,000 for Marion Lynn has nothing valuable to contribute. (0.47 seconds)
12 October 2009
at 6:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
Shouldn't
this
all
be
over
at
river*itytalks
_______________________________________________
Nope, he is using that site to collect money for McCain. Snort.
12 October 2009
at 6:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beerguy (Anonymous) says…
Hey give Obama credit, he has done more in 8 months then the US has managed to do in 300 years. Who else can triple a debt that took 300 years to make in just 8 months? All Bush did was killed thousands of innocent people, sh*t anybody can do that nowadays.
12 October 2009
at 6:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Boston_Corbett (Anonymous) says…
Marioni, the expert on racism. I wonder why?
12 October 2009
at 7:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
beerguy (Anonymous) says…
Hey give Obama credit, he has done more in 8 months then the US has managed to do in 300 years. Who else can triple a debt that took 300 years to make in just 8 months? All Bush did was killed thousands of innocent people, sh*t anybody can do that nowadays.
__________________________________________________
300 years! Huh? Tripling the debt in 8 months?
Shakes head. Decides finishing post isn't even worth the time.
12 October 2009
at 7:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beerguy (Anonymous) says…
Some of the national debt we have is from the civil and revolutionary wars, I read a book about it.
12 October 2009
at 7:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
After reading this thread I recall an old saying.: ” The bigger fool is not the person who thinks he knows everything, rather it is the person who argues with him”
12 October 2009
at 8:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“The world is happy about it” someone wrote.
Well, not the whole world it would seem.
http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-10-1…
“The Nobel Peace Prize is an odd thing. It has gone to institutions - Amnesty, the International Atomic Energy Agency, Médecins Sans Frontières and the UN's peacekeeping forces; to those involved in attempting to make peace despite having blood on their hands, such as Yasser Arafat, and to figures such as Henry Kissinger who was more associated in the public imagination with the war in Vietnam.
It has gone to symbols of peace — such as the Dalai Lama — and some more questionable figures, such as Mother Teresa. Most notably it has gone to relentless campaigners for human rights, equality and the ending of violence: Jimmy Carter, Aung San Su Kyii, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela. What unites the best winners is not simply an inspirational discourse but the sense they stand for something. Actions achieved or a long commitment to an ideal, often through hardship.
Indeed, the reasoning behind the awarding of the prize to previous American presidents has been easier to discern. Teddy Roosevelt opened the court of arbitration in The Hague and helped mediate a peace treaty between Russia and Japan; Woodrow Wilson was the founder of the League of Nations. Jimmy Carter won his prize for his “untiring efforts to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts”.
Which is what makes the awarding of this year's prize to a president who has been in office for a mere nine months an odd departure. It is as if the prize committee had been persuaded to give the award on the future delivery of promises.
The citation describes his “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” in his outreach to the Muslim world and efforts to end nuclear proliferation.
Which is all very well, except that Obama is fighting wars in two Islamic states — Iraq and Afghanistan — and his efforts at international diplomacy, notwithstanding his powerful desire to achieve quick results, has thus far shown almost no progress in pushing forward peace talks in the Middle East and only very partial progress on Iran.
It is true that he has made real advances in “resetting” US-Russian relations, not least over his decision to cancel an anti-missile shield that was to be based in Eastern Europe, but the consequences of that engagement are too early to judge.
The reality is that the prize appears to have been awarded to Barack Obama for what he is not. For not being George Bush. Or rather being less like the last president. The question now is whether having being anointed perhaps too early by the committee, a Nobel prize earned so cheaply and at so little cost will help him in his efforts on the international stage or rather be an albatross around his neck. Something against which all his future efforts will be judged - and perhaps found wanting.
12 October 2009
at 8:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion says…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cvotw…
12 October 2009
at 8:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
They sure don't like it when The Chosen One is challenged, do they?
12 October 2009
at 9:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
They sure don't like it when The Chosen One is challenged, do they?
__________________________________________________
As usual. You are getting it wrong. I am sure a small part of it is intentional ignorance, just like you can't get your brain wrapped around the fact that there is a reason the people of Iran have no use for the US. The rest is just out right ignorance of which I am sure most are addressing here.
12 October 2009
at 9:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
They sure don't like it when The Chosen One is challenged, do they?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It has nothing to do with your rabid hatred of President Obama. All of your posts remind me of the Charlie Brown teacher voice regardless of topic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7k04w…
12 October 2009
at 9:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Katara seems to be having an episode of fixation.
oh wait
http://www.thegrio.com/2009/10/this-m…
Obama does not deserve his Nobel Peace Prize
By Jason Ravin
“Speaking from the Rose Garden this morning President Obama announced that he would accept the Nobel Peace Prize. The president said that he does not view it as a recognition of his own accomplishments, but as a call to action for the international community to confront global issues.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced its decision to award President Barack Obama the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” The decision, a surprise to many, appears in large part to be based on Obama's campaign for the U.S. presidency. The deadline for nominations was February 1 meaning that Obama was nominated before serving his first eleven days in office.
An excerpt from the will of Alfred Nobel, the founder of the Nobel Prizes, instructs that the Nobel Peace Prize should be awarded “to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”
So how does Obama stand up against this criterion set by Nobel? Unfortunately not well.
The prize comes at a time when Obama has had little success in the way of creating or sustaining peace. The new president is currently debating Gen. Stanley McChrystal's recommendation to increase troop levels in Afghanistan due to increased U.S. causalities. In Iraq, 124,000 U.S. soldiers remain in armed conflict.
Further, the growth in U.S. military expenditures has continued. On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate approved $636 billion in military funding, $3.9 billon less then the White House requested. The propensity for armed conflict does not appear to be abating, which makes Obama a very odd choice for the Peace prize.
In the last few weeks, the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks have all but frozen under Obama's leadership, and the threat of nuclear Iran appears to make our current president mimic the words of our last one.
Put bluntly, President Obama does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. The current president lacks any significant accomplishment on the matter of conflict resolution with the exception of his beer summit on race relations earlier this summer.
The matter of international or domestic peace is the result of a body of work - not something accomplished in nine months. Obama now stands in a league with only two other African-Americans who have won the Noble Peace Prize: Dr. Ralph Bunche and Dr. Martin Luther King. A review of their work for domestic and international peace towers over the largely symbolic accomplishments of our current president.
There may be a time when President Obama is deserving of this award, but for now, he will have to try his best to live up it.
12 October 2009
at 9:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Katara seems to be having an episode of fixation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That's pretty amusing coming from someone who obsessively (to the tune of 18,000+) posts on a local newspaper website in a town in which he does not live. Add to that the almost daily blogs about his rabid hatred of the current US President and of a major world religion.
Keep on wharrgarbling, old man. It is what you do best.
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/38…
12 October 2009
at 9:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And Pravda says:
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americ…
“The question why Barack Obama was chosen as this year’s Nobel Peace Prize Laureate can be answered with another: Why was George W. Bush never even considered for it? The answer in both cases is more than obvious. Yet the entire question is far more complex than Barack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize and George W. Bush getting nowhere near it.
It is entirely to do with the international community sending a clear sign to the United States of America that the will is there to welcome the prodigal son back into the fold, but on certain conditions. And everyone knows this.
And the fact that there are any conditions at all is a disgrace and a total humiliation for the nation which purported to be the saviour of the free and the bastion of freedom and democracy for two centuries, it is a clear sign that these noble precepts were insulted to their core by a succession of administrations pandering to the interests of the clique of corporate elitists which had Washington’s throat in their grasp and which controlled the United Sates of America’s foreign policy…..”
12 October 2009
at 9:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigPrune (Anonymous) says…
What was Obama's first word when he found out he won the Nobel Prize?
“Dyn-o-mite!”
12 October 2009
at 9:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
I see you are capitalizing on your blog by stealing the idea from another blog. It is obvious that Obama could never do anything to please you and some of the others on here.
I am thinking since you hate him so bad it would be much more productive for you fear mongering racists to be helping beat the bushes to scrape up a viable candidate to run in 2012 and help the Republicans come up with some sort of platform that would please the masses. I guess since you are content to bad mouth Obama he will be around another 4 years because there isn't anyone to run against him that is worth voting for.
12 October 2009
at 9:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And in Germany they say:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/w…
Obama's Nobel Prize Is More of a Burden than an Honor
By Claus Christian Malzahn
The Nobel Peace Prize has come too early for Barack Obama. The US president cannot point to any real diplomatic successes to date and there are few prospects of any to come.
It used to be the rule that the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to politicians if they could point to tangible political successes. American presidents and politicians have consistently been recipients of the award: Theodor Roosevelt received the award in 1906 for his role in securing a peace deal between Russia and Japan. Woodrow Wilson was honored with the prize in 1919 for his work on the creation of the League of Nations, the precursor to the United Nations. Martin Luther King was presented with the award in 1964 for his commitment to civil rights for African Americans. The former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was even controversially given the nod in 1973 for his role in negotiating an end to the Vietnam War.
Now it is the turn of the 44th president of the United States, Barack Obama, who was awarded the prize on Friday for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples,”
cont'd:
12 October 2009
at 9:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
cont'd:
With all respect to both Obama as a person and to his office: Is that really enough?
Obama has been in office for nine months. His attempts to use brilliant speeches and diplomatic initiatives to find a way out of long-drawn-out conflicts are well worth the effort. He has tried to create an international climate in which dialogue and honest statements are possible once again.
Yet Obama is just getting started. Awarding him the Nobel Prize now is like giving a medal to a marathon runner who has just managed the first few kilometers. The situation in Iraq is still fragile; in Afghanistan, it has even got worse. Despite the massive efforts by the US administration, there seems little immediate prospect of reaching a compromise between the Israelis and Palestinians in the Middle East. The Iranian regime is still playing its nuclear games with the West at the diplomatic level, while at home one dissident after another is put on the scaffold. A nuclear-armed Pakistan looks close to collapse, while in North Korea, Dr. Strangelove is stroking his bomb.
The most surprise at Oslo's decision will be felt in the US itself. That is because the man who was singled out for the prize on Friday is not the American president, a man who has to make tough and sometimes unpopular decisions at home, but a global symbolic figure who during the 2008 election campaign came to embody the hopes and desires of people around the world. Obama even laid claim to these almost superhuman expectations. However, nine months after his inauguration, his current political task is to be seen to be a president who can practise the art of realpolitik as well as being the globally popular hope for the future. The awarding of the prize won't go far to help him with that. In fact, it will be more of a burden than an honor. …..”
12 October 2009
at 10:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigPrune (Anonymous) says…
headdoctor,
That was a Jay Leno joke
12 October 2009
at 10:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
BigPrune (Anonymous) says…
headdoctor,
That was a Jay Leno joke
________________________________________________
I was ribbing Marion for using similar Obama content from your Blog. If you are referencing the dynomite post, I would have never known it was a Jay Leno joke. I don't watch his show.
13 October 2009
at 12:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
BigPrune (Anonymous) says…
headdoctor,
That was a Jay Leno joke
________________________________________________
I was ribbing Marion for using similar Obama content from your Blog. If you are referencing the dynomite post, I would have never known it was a Jay Leno joke. I don't watch his show.”
Marion writes:
Really young, aren't you, there, headdoctor?
The appropriate response to “Dyno-mite!” is:
“Shazzam!”
13 October 2009
at 12:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And headdoctor, you'd better look at the dates on the blogs, you silly person.
“Buy'em books and buy'em books and all they do is eat the covers!”
Marion writes:
BigPrune, you keep up the good work; your defence of this once proud nation!
13 October 2009
at 6:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
Dyn-o-mite! is actually a quote from JJ walker on GoodTimes.
13 October 2009
at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Really young, aren't you, there, headdoctor?
The appropriate response to “Dyno-mite!” is:
“Shazzam!”
and
And headdoctor, you'd better look at the dates on the blogs, you silly person.
__________________________________________________
I read dates just fine. I wasn't saying your idea for your blog came from BigPrune. I was giving you grief for your posting content. The subject of your blog assuming you had stuck to it was different from what Big Prune's was.
Knowing terms doesn't date any one persons age. Both words and their different spellings, Shazam, Shazzam, Dynomite, and Dyno-mite as well as a few spellings that were not included here have been around for decades and used to name or describe many things. Just because someone posts it free standing, doesn't mean everyone will automatically know the basis for why they used the term.
Now who is a silly person? You would think that by now you would have learned assuming doesn't help with much of anything and especially if your deductive reasoning is painfully lacking.
13 October 2009
at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
ironhorse66 (Anonymous) says…
what a fool.
so now with this blog Maude has the secret service watching him.
in addition to irs,srs,fbi,kbi, and a handful of angry University of Kansas athletes.
_________________________________________________
Yeah, Marion thinks he knows computers and how to sneak around on the net when in reality he is about as subtle as a herd of stampeding buffalo leaving a net trail a grade schooler could follow. He hasn't figured out that the reason he doesn't have his butt in a sling isn't because he is good or sly, but more of a case that he isn't worth their time.
13 October 2009
at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Well, I've offered up some ideas as to why Barack Hussein Obama was given the Dynamite Prize, so let me suggest another……………..
How about that it is sort of a bribe from the peaceniks who don't want him to send 60,000 troops to Afghanistan?
13 October 2009
at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Left_handed (Anonymous) says…
The Nobels gave Jimmah Cartah his peace prize as “a kick in the leg to George Bush”. 2002. Algore's shared award was a similar nod to a liberal appeaser. Bill Clinton should be annoyed that he is the only Democrat president elected in the last 40 years who doesn't have a Nobel Peace Prize.
It amazes me that so many of you left-tard moonbats come on here and excoriate Marion for his posts. If you find his offerings so repugnant why don't you just stay away from his blog? That way you could use your playground namecalling skills towards each other, where it would be more amusing.
13 October 2009
at 9:41 a.m.
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
13 October 2009
at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bad_dog (Anonymous) says…
“It amazes me that so many of you left-tard moonbats come on here and excoriate Marion for his posts. If you find his offerings so repugnant why don't you just stay away from his blog?”
Ooh, left-tard moonbats. And you were pontificating about playground namecalling skills?
Insults unheard of since the days of Kevin Groenhagen and his many reincarnations…
Hmm…
13 October 2009
at 9:58 a.m.
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
13 October 2009
at 10:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Left_handed (Anonymous) says…
It amazes me that so many of you left-tard moonbats come on here and excoriate Marion for his posts. If you find his offerings so repugnant why don't you just stay away from his blog?
_________________________________________________
Marion brings this on himself, that and the slanted enforcement of the ljw tos. i suspect if he didn't enjoy all the attention he would do something about it. Apparently you are missing the fact that the only qualification to being a left-tard moonbat is to disagree with the hate, racism, and rants of the right-tard moonbats.
I consider giving Marion a good smack down a public service. Posting against Marion when he is spewing forth his self proclaimed vast knowledge about everything from computers to law to internet marketing that is wrong isn't for Marion's benefit. It is for readers who might not know that his stupid advice will just get them in trouble and I don't want to see Marion get the enjoyment out of seeing someone fail because of his advise.
13 October 2009
at 11:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ralphralph (Anonymous) says…
Obama = Empty talk + Broken promises.
13 October 2009
at 11:12 a.m.
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
13 October 2009
at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Oh, darn and that was really funny!
13 October 2009
at 11:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
headdoctor:
That should read “advice”, not “advise”.
Tsk, tsk.
Grammar fail.
13 October 2009
at 11:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
I am still waiting for these jokers like Marion to stop wasting their time bashing Obama and offer suggestions for a valid Republican platform other that just being obstructive and a viable candidate for the 2012 election. That would mean someone besides Palin. What I find hilarious is the most likely Republican candidate could turn out to be more socially Liberal as a Republican than Obama is socially Liberal for the Democrats. So, what difference does it make? Oh, I forgot he is white and no known ties to the Muslim religion.
Marion denies that his motives are racist. Except for a few hiccups here and there, Obama is not only following but expanding the previous administrations actions. There wasn't a problem then so why now? Even though you want to play ignorant and innocent about your posts, you know why people are calling you racist and you prove it by continuing to post that way. You can't even plead that it is just because Obama is for Socialism because the bulk of the new Republicans in power are just as bad, they just go about it in a little different way and gear it more for their benefit than spreading the benefit country wide. Their actions are still that of a Socialist.
Now Marion, what part of that can't you get your brain wrapped around?
13 October 2009
at 11:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
You got a long wait there, headdoctor!
This blog is about the awarding of the Dynamite Peace Prize to the New Prince of Peace, Barack Hussein Obama, not any theoretical Republican platform.
13 October 2009
at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
headdoctor:
That should read “advice”, not “advise”.
Tsk, tsk.
Grammar fail.
__________________________________________________
Is that all you have for a comeback is to play grammar police?
You make typos too, Marion.
Translation= Marion has nothing legitimate to come back with.
13 October 2009
at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Note to Artichoke and self:
It is OK to have a blog about “in your pants”, with all the ramifications thereof but it is not OK to make Monica Lewinsky jokes.
13 October 2009
at 11:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
You got a long wait there, headdoctor!
This blog is about the awarding of the Dynamite Peace Prize to the New Prince of Peace, Barack Hussein Obama, not any theoretical Republican platform.
_________________________________________________
Typical avoidance of the issues with your usual deflection tactics and of course you don't want to spoil your racist rant by putting in something of real substance to discuss.
13 October 2009
at 11:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Posters keep howling “Racism!” through foaming keyboards and yet when I ask which of the images posted above are “racist”, I get no reply!
Whatup?
13 October 2009
at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And for the more reading challenged among you, I will repeat the purpose of this blog:
“Which of the following images might most accurately display why Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Dynamite Peace Prize, I wonder: ”
I don't see anything there about Republican platforms, “alternative solutions”, GWB, the RSPCA or even Puerto Rico.
13 October 2009
at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Roadkill_Rob (Anonymous) says…
Marion,
You're an idiot.
13 October 2009
at 12:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Posters keep howling “Racism!” through foaming keyboards and yet when I ask which of the images posted above are “racist”, I get no reply!
__________________________________________________
If you really wanted to understand you could spend time reading several thousand of your eighteen thousand posts and you wouldn't even need to ask that question.
13 October 2009
at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgiahawk (Anonymous) says…
Marion, are you really this ignorant? Are you really this childish? I know you think you are funny, but this just has no humor to it. I am amazed that you can even function in a civilized world. Are you the male version of the cat lady on the Simpsons?
13 October 2009
at 12:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
And for the more reading challenged among you, I will repeat the purpose of this blog:
“Which of the following images might most accurately display why Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Dynamite Peace Prize, I wonder: ”
________________________________________________
We get it Marion. The first time. You can say what you want, when you want on other threads but you avoid questions or get bent because you started this one and don't like the direction it is headed. News alert just for Marion. If you don't like what is being posted take your blog down like some others have done. This isn't your forum and you do not get to dictate what is posted just because you started the blog.
13 October 2009
at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
Gosh was it something I said?
13 October 2009
at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
yup, calling this a racist attack certainly underlines the real race problem in this country; People who don't know what racism is, but can't help but constantly tell people how racist they are.
13 October 2009
at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
I think the deal is this……………………..
.the Left and those possessed by ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome) have decided that any and all criticism of The New Prince of Peace is “racist” in character, based on the half-blackness of The Chosen One.
Of course this is blatant attempt to stifle independent thought, stop free thinking and quash political dissidence; quite as is done in places like Red China and North Korea.
Since the term “racism” is a hot button and trips all sorts of triggers, many who are so accused will indeed fall silent.
But not me.
I know a scam when I see it.
13 October 2009
at 1:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Still don't know which of the posted images are “racist”.
13 October 2009
at 1:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
I know a scam when I see it.
_________________________________________________
I have no doubt.
But…but….Marion, if you are trying to control what people can say on your blogs, aren't you trying to limit free speech?
13 October 2009
at 1:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
The more ridiculous, ineffective, inept, disorderly, clueless, irresponsible and embarassing this administration and congress become, the more shrill and panicky the left becomes and the more they are frenetically looking for a scapegoat (Fox News, Rush, Palin, etc.). Joke if there ever was one. WOW!
You know what they say about excuses, and right now they are all on the left. What's that tell you about the left? Right. If I were guessing, maybe 20% of Americans still feel some level of benevolence to this government. The rest are somewhere between a little disheartened/disenchanted to downright mad as hell.
Obama, Pelosi and Reid have managed to alienate practically every base who voted them into power. That takes some real talent!
13 October 2009
at 1:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
yup, calling this a racist attack certainly underlines the real race problem in this country; People who don't know what racism is, but can't help but constantly tell people how racist they are.
________________________________________________
One might very easily agree with your assessment on this particular blog if it were not Marion. I would even agree that the race or racist card is played all to often.
Again, this is Marion. Perhaps to understand a little more of the issue here you should peruse through a few thousand of Marion's posts to get a better feel of why people jump his butt. It isn't hard to see why he insists on dragging out these type of subjects. Marion loves to incite reaction especially if he can do it with a racial slant.
13 October 2009
at 1:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jayhawklawrence (Anonymous) says…
Congratulations Marion.
You truly represent the current state of the Republican Party in America.
I am certain that if Reagan were alive today, he would not recognize any of it. He would be disgusted with his own party.
I am relieved that we survived (barely) 8 years of Bush and Cheney.
13 October 2009
at 2:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
I know a scam when I see it.
_________________________________________________
I have no doubt.
But…but….Marion, if you are trying to control what people can say on your blogs, aren't you trying to limit free speech?”
Marion writes:
Nope.
Trying to get the flightier ones to stick to the subject, that's all.
The first dodge of the Left is the Red Herring; can't deal with the subject matter; try to change it!
Still haven't been told which of the images posted are “racist”!
13 October 2009
at 2:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Where in this blog is a “racial slant”?
13 October 2009
at 2:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
The more ridiculous, ineffective, inept, disorderly, clueless, irresponsible and embarassing this administration and congress become, the more shrill and panicky the left becomes and the more they are frenetically looking for a scapegoat (Fox News, Rush, Palin, etc.). Joke if there ever was one. WOW!
You know what they say about excuses, and right now they are all on the left. What's that tell you about the left? Right. If I were guessing, maybe 20% of Americans still feel some level of benevolence to this government. The rest are somewhere between a little disheartened/disenchanted to downright mad as hell.
Obama, Pelosi and Reid have managed to alienate practically every base who voted them into power. That takes some real talent!
________________________________________________
Yeah, and? McCain/Palin lost. Regardless of what you think Obama is in office until at least 2012. We get that you, Marion and some others don't like Obama. Unless you have a better plan you are going to have to put on your big boy pants and deal with the fact he is in office. For your own good health you really should take a chill pill before you blow a head gasket. I suggest channeling your energy elsewhere.
I have tried to get an answer out of Marion about this. Maybe you would like to answer?
I am still waiting for Republicans to stop wasting their time bashing Obama and offer suggestions for a valid Republican platform other than just being obstructive and a viable candidate for the 2012 election.
13 October 2009
at 2:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
brujablanco (Anonymous) says…
Ok, Maude, you win, the answer to your question:
“Which of the following images might most accurately display why Barack Hussein Obama was awarded the Dynamite Peace Prize, I wonder: ”
None of the above.
Now you and your half-baked twit of a cohort can go back to stalking and harassing private citizens.
13 October 2009
at 2:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgiahawk (Anonymous) says…
Don't wate your time Headdoctor, has Marion or Tom ever offered any valid suggestions on political affairs? Right now their only concern is showing all of us that can think for ourselves how ignorant they are. It is no wonder the repub's are in such a sad state, this appears to be the result of their “thought process”.
13 October 2009
at 3:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
you know, I do see a lot of people attacking this president based on his promises, lies, and inabilities. And I think that doing so is not only our right as Americans, but our responsibility. Just because the Republicans lost in the last election does not force them out of the debate. It becomes incumbent upon them to challenge this president and congress to answer for their actions. The left had 6 solid years to bitch about the Republicans and another two just for Bush., and they used that time to belittle our president at every single turn. There were times when the conversation was totally called for in regards to war and world trade, but when the conversation turned to how stupid the commander in chief was, I didn't see any liberals crying foul. I saw them jumping on the bandwagon making a mockery of the office.
Now there are individuals who don't like the president because of his race (or half race, whatever), but the bulk of complaints I'm seeing are formulated around policy. and since the left doesn't have a whole lot of defense against what's being said, the word racism miraculously appears just to shut down the conversation.
13 October 2009
at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
I was just reading the Nobel defense of Obama's nomination. one of the judges cited Obama's scaling down of the missile defense shield as a reason he was nominated. well how could that be possible? wasn't he nominated a week and a half after his inauguration, yet he nixed the defense shield only a few weeks ago…so the nomination was on a whim, and the actual reasons were filled in later?
13 October 2009
at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rbwaa (Anonymous) says…
again i ask, why isn't there a “suggest removal” button for blogs??
13 October 2009
at 3:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Cappy (Anonymous) says…
Uh, Normal, it works like this. He was nominated months ago, as were a couple hundred other people. The choice was made days ago. Can you wrap your head around that?
13 October 2009
at 3:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Head and Georgia, here's my Repub plan:
Get rid of all the socialists now in DC, they are not working out with this “hope and change” so much. America has learned this in a very short period of time. Democrats are great at getting in power, lousy and staying in power.
Show me a Clinton or an Obama and I'll show you instant party change.
13 October 2009
at 4:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
yeah Cappy I can. can you not be a prick about it? Can you explain what he was nominated for, and can you list who else was nominated and the reasons why?
13 October 2009
at 5:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
headdoctor (Anonymous) says…
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Head and Georgia, here's my Repub plan:
Get rid of all the socialists now in DC, they are not working out with this “hope and change” so much. America has learned this in a very short period of time. Democrats are great at getting in power, lousy and staying in power.
__________________________________________________
Thanks for taking a stab at it. That is more than Marion ever did. I was thinking a few possible names might be dropped on here for discussion. There are a good three dozen or more possible candidates although some are obviously not viable choices but there seems to be three or four that might be acceptable to the public.
I think if I understand from a previous post on another thread that you would like to fire all the Congress and if the next bunch don't work out keep getting them out of office until something works. My question is, how do you get rid of all the Socialists in DC? I know it is a dirty word to some but Socialism has become ingrained in both parties and the operation of our Country has been set up to rely on it. Even our GNP or what ever term they are using this week for it is reliant on Socialism to a degree.
13 October 2009
at 7 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
headdoctor:
That should read “advice”, not “advise”.
Tsk, tsk.
Grammar fail.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tsk. Tsk. Marion doesn't know the difference between an error in grammar and a spelling error.
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/9884/g…
13 October 2009
at 7:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Still don't know which of the posted images are “racist”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why don't you find a local Black Panthers group and ask them? I'm sure you'll get an answer.
13 October 2009
at 7:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
Marion: “Trying to get the flightier ones to stick to the subject, that's all.”
What subject? This blog has no subject! It is just a bunch of images you lifted from other websites. Yawn.
The non-stop whining and crocodile tears of the neocons are so old, although I do love to know that you are so miserable all the time.
Now, can anyone else name a blogger around here who regularly has posts removed from his own blogs? What a joke.
13 October 2009
at 9:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Still don't know which of the posted images are “racist”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why don't you find a local Black Panthers group and ask them? I'm sure you'll get an answer.”
Marion writes:
Oh.
You want me to contact a racist, black hate organisation to tell me what is “racist”, right?
Got it.
Why don't you tell me which of the images are “racist”?
You won't because none of them are.
Scaredy cat!
13 October 2009
at 10:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
“The non-stop whining and crocodile tears of the neocons are so old, although I do love to know that you are so miserable all the time.” -beatrice
Aaaaagain, do you not remember the past several years? To school us on whining and crocodile tears and being miserable……please beatrice. You have to live with this now, like we did all those W years. Sorry, just the way it is.
13 October 2009
at 10:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Katara (Anonymous) says…
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Marion writes:
Oh.
You want me to contact a racist, black hate organisation to tell me what is “racist”, right?
Got it.
Why don't you tell me which of the images are “racist”?
You won't because none of them are.
Scaredy cat!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sure, whatever you say, J. Edgar.
13 October 2009
at 10:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
Tom, it looks like you just wrote, “But … but, Bush!”
Yes, I remember the last eight years, and I remember a time when Bush enjoyed a 90% approval rating. People weren't just bashing for no reason. The dislike of his policies and his later low approval ratings was something he earned. He earned his bashing. It wasn't just whining for the sake of whining. This “blog” doesn't even say anything, nor is it original. It is taking other people's images and putting on line. Big whoop. It is just whining made visual. boo hoo boo hoo.
I love how miserable neocons are.
13 October 2009
at 11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Sure got your attention though, didn't it?
13 October 2009
at 11:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
How did Bush get into this?
I made no mention of Bush.
The blog was about representative images.
Whatup?
These people apparently have the attention span of fruit flies or are some kind of ADD, I think!
13 October 2009
at 11:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Why is it do you suppose that whenever The New Prince Of Peace; Barack Hussein Obama is criticised, the only thing that his supports can reply with are comments about GWB?
Whatup?
14 October 2009
at 3:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jackbinkelman (Anonymous) says…
Suggest Removal!!!!!
14 October 2009
at 6:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgiahawk (Anonymous) says…
Tom, brilliant plan!!! How do you plan on getting rid of all of the socialist in DC? The answer to that I am betting is a little scarey to the average citizen! If the things you say on these blogs actually reflect your thought process (or rather the limitations there of), I am worried that if your actions reflect that same process, than we will be seeing you on the news someday after you have done something horific! Get some help before “going postal” is replaced with “going Shewman”!
14 October 2009
at 6:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Made_in_China (Paul R. Getto) says…
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.wake me when this is over.
14 October 2009
at 6:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Funny g-hawk. Thanks for the laugh. Sorry though, I'm not the type to “go postal” and maybe I'm not the same “Tom Shewmon” in person…..I do afterall, have a role to play on this here award-winning forum. I did 'go postal' on a deer Monday afternoon though–toughest shot I've ever taken. I was proud of that one. ;-)
14 October 2009
at 7:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
Hey Tom when you do go postal try pushing some of these topic derailers off the road to nowhere.
14 October 2009
at 7:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TomShewmon (Tom Shewmon) says…
Just responding to beatrice about the whining going on now, and once again, offering a friendly reminder of what the right had to listen to over the past several years. Then I get attacked and so the story goes. BFD. And as I always suggest, artichokeheart, you post what you want and I'll post what I want, deal? Simple.
14 October 2009
at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
brujablanco (Anonymous) says…
14 October 2009
at 7:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
Hey Tom when you do go postal try pushing some of these topic derailers off the road to nowhere
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
saving this comment for posterity, and the authorities if neccessary. :-)
14 October 2009
at 12:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
“jackbinkelman (Anonymous) says…
Suggest Removal!!!!!”
Marion writes:
Why?
You ascared of the truth?
14 October 2009
at 2:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
AreUNorml (Anonymous) says…
it seems to me that the truth is about the most offensive thing most people will ever hear. after all, why would anyone be offended by that which is untrue?
14 October 2009
at 6:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
artichokeheart (Anonymous) says…
The truth is that when the Bush boys were in office there were alot of things said. Same for Clinton, Reagan, Carter etc. Some true and some not. Some things were twisted for vengence and some just for fun.
Obama has now taken over so he gets everything those before him got from the other side. It is the price he pays for being the top banana.
14 October 2009
at 8:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
“Sure got your attention though, didn't it?”
So would a sack of dead skunks. Doesn't mean it is worth anything.
You write that this is “the truth” — what truth? The truth that you know how to copy and paste images? Big whoop. I guess if I also added a picture of Mother Theresa standing with her arms crossed, and a picture of Pete Rose standing with his arms crossed, why, that would mean Obama is just like those two as well! Gee, great “truth.”
“the only thing that his supports can reply with are comments about GWB?”
Two things - one, people do mention Bush (43) as a comparative because he was our most recent president. Are we supposed to pretend history doesn't exist every time we get a new Pres? That would be moronic. We also did all the comparison worthwhile against McCain during the election. No point in continuing that now. No, comparing a President to other Presidents makes perfect sense. The real question — the “truthful” question - is, why are you so scared or ashamed of such comparisons? Second - Tom is the one who keeps bringing up Bush. I guess he must qualify as a supporter of Obama then. How about that Tom, you are now part of the wacko liberal elite lefty fringe. Again, moronic.
Tom, why play a role here? Why not just be honest?
15 October 2009
at 2:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Blog updates.
19 October 2009
at 6:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bondmen (Anonymous) says…
Shouting 'racism' today to an opponent is like in the playground days when an argument had reached maturity the antagonist bereft of any more good reasons or arguments would always say 'stupid' or 'idiot'. That frequent response certainly lifted the discussion to a new level on the intellectual plane, didn't it? So today's overuse of the word 'racism' has come to be an odoriferous order to 'shut up, don't say anything more' demand that debate stop! Mmmmm, Mmmmm, Mmmmm.
Try it next time, when you hear the 'racism' demand shouted, to substitute the words 'shut up' or 'quit speaking' in its place and its intended use will finally be made clear.