wakarusaguy

Follow

Comment history

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

(BS...

...have they got a gun to your head, Bob, and they won't let you reply...
even though you want to post proof here that you're NOT a knowing
tool of professional deceivers...?

Two winks, left eye, Bob...that's the signal you're being held hostage
by these terrorists, and you can't act or speak freely.

OK, Bob ? Two winks. Left eye.)

July 21, 2017 at 9:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

20 GOP lawmakers from Kansas attending ALEC convention

Senator Suellentrop and his colleagues are still the the ALEC conference today: but I wrote to let him know several people responded to his comments here.

Maybe he'll drop back by.

His e-mail is:
Gene.Suellentrop@senate.ks.gov

July 21, 2017 at 3:24 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

Good morning, BS.

Hmmm, nothing from you yet, Bob.

No link to prove Snopes said Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies,...and no admission you were fooled by that lie . . .

Sure you've got it straight, Bob ? By not answering, you want to tell us that . . .

you know the Washington Times article you posted is a lie . . .

but you still stand with posting that lie here . . .

and you post that lie with the intent to deceive us.

If that's NOT what you mean to say, Bob, just post a negative word or two: "No," or "Not so," or something.

Let us know where you stand toward truth and lies, Bob.

That's important.

July 20, 2017 at 7:26 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

I've been waiting all day to hear from you, Bob...but you don't respond.

Tell you what, Bob...simple way you can communicate what you want to say, without having to say anything, O.K. ?

Post a link to the Snopes article that says Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies, and we'll all know such an article exists.

No link, and we'll all know that no such an article exists.

If you told us the lie because the liars fooled you to believe it's TRUE, just say so; and we'll know you didn't intend to deceive anyone.

Or say nothing, if you stand by the lie you told. That will be the signal you have every intention of deceiving people. O.K., Bob ?

I'll check with you in the morning, Bob.

July 20, 2017 at 12:20 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

Yoo-hoo, BS...

Would you please post that link to the Snopes article that says Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies ?

In the alternative, please tell us: were you fooled by "conservative" liars who SAID there was such a Snopes article, though it doesn't exist ?

I've been pretty patient, Bob. But you haven't responded all day. Please let me hear from you.

July 19, 2017 at 5:20 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

BS, are you there ?

Your failing to post a link to the supposed Snopes article that shows Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies makes me seriously question if any such article exists. I know I couldn't find it, despite diligent searching on Snopes website.

So if it does exist, please post a link to it at your first opportunity, and vindicate your reputation for truthfulness.

But if it doesn't exist...if you believed what you read on the internet, without checking to see if it was actually true...just say so. We all make mistakes, so we can all forgive you a mistake.

The professional liars online are extremely good at their job. They can fool anyone, unless we're strictly focused on truth. So if they fooled you, all of us can understand and sympathize with you. We wouldn't judge you for that, if you just honestly admitted you were deceived.

That would also speak well for your integrity. If the masters of lies deceived you about what was true, and you passed on lies because you BELIEVED they were true, you're careless. But as I said, all the rest of us fallible beings would readily forgive you that mistake, if you admit it that's what it was.

If you can't prove the story you posted is true, by giving us a link to verify it...and won't admit that you posted it because you'd been deceived to think it was true...What should we think then, Bob ?

Won't we have to conclude that the story you posted is a lie, and that you KNOWINGLY (not mistakenly) posted it with the intent to deceive us ? We'll have to conclude you're not an unwary victim of deceivers, but their WilLING tool, won't we ?

You have the power to convince us you're actually a good person, Bob. Just post a link to the Snopes story that Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies, and we'll believe it exists. And we'll credit you as an honest man.

July 19, 2017 at 2:42 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

'Let Obamacare fail,' Trump says after GOP plan collapses

It's unfortunate that for some Americans, very obviously including Trump and the "conservative" faction, "Obamacare" only has symbolic meaning. For Trump and "conservatives," it's clear "Obamacare" is a one-dimensional code-word for everything they hate.

And I've never heard an explanation that makes commonsense, WHY they hate "Obamacare." Except that its slang-name (which they themselves hung on it) has "Obama" in it: and of course opposing everything "Obama" continues to be pretty entirely their whole political "principle."

It's unfortunate that for some Americans, very obviously including Trump and the "conservative" faction, "Obamacare" only has symbolic meaning. The effectual meaning is what it does: and "Obamacare" has given millions of people healthcare-security they never had previously.

The effectual meaning, therefore, of president Trump's intent to "let Obamacare fail" comes down to "scr*w those people."

July 19, 2017 at 12:12 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

It's pretty important to show that you're a truthful person whose word can be trusted, don't you think, B.S. ?

Otherwise, there's no reason anybody should believe anything you ever say, is there ?

All you need to do is post the link to Snopes' research that says Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies. That's easy enough, isn't it, Bob ?

But take more time if you need to. Proving your honesty is too important a matter to rush.

July 19, 2017 at 11:46 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

Hi, BS:

Need more time to find and post that link that proves you're telling the truth ?

It shouldn't take long. Just search Snopes 'til you find their article that says Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies, then copy the link to that Snopes' web-page, sign onto the Journal-World's website, and paste the link into a comment here.

Five minutes' work, tops.

But proving you are a truthful person whose word can be trusted is an EXTREMELY important thing: so take more time if you need to.

July 19, 2017 at 9:53 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Witch hunt? Then you believe this

BS:

OK, I read the link you posted as proof that Snopes verified Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies.

The link you posted shows The Washington Times said that. Thing is, neither you nor the Washington Times gives a link to the Snopes article saying Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies.

I searched Snopes' website every way I could think of to find their article that says Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies. I couldn't find any Snopes article that said anything like that.

But maybe I'm just not a very good researcher. After all, The Washington Times says there is such an article on Snopes...and I'm sure you verified it existed before you put your own reputation for truthfulness on the line by posting here that such an article exists on Snopes. Maybe you can give us a link here to that article...?

"The Washington Times" is the propaganda sheet of the Unification Church ("Moonies")...but that doesn't necessarily mean everything they print is a lie. They could have easily proved their story was true by publishing a link to the Snopes article, so we could all see that there really is a Snopes story saying Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies.

They didn't do that. But you can PROVE the Times' truthfulness, and your own. Just post a link to Snopes' article that says Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies. OK ?

When you do that, it'll prove I'm a rather incompetent researcher; and I'll be glad to admit so, here, publicly.

If you DON't post a link we can all go to and see for ourselves that there's a Snopes article saying Trump is the victim of liberal-media lies, people will have to suspect there isn't one. That will seem to prove that you and The Washington Times are spreading lies.

Jesus said it best. Satan is "the father of lies."

July 19, 2017 at 8:16 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Previous

loading...