Advertisement

secretresistance

Follow

Comment history

Has the recent recall affected your appetite for beef?

All you people who voted yes, don't know realize that that recall goes back until 2006, and the vast majority of the beef in question has already been eaten? There is no new danger in the meat. Just eat it.

February 24, 2008 at 7:01 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

From the cloth

My daughter likes to play with her Fuzzibunz just like Max. What a cute picture to find in the LJWorld of all places!

Cloth is hazardous to health? I guess we're in real trouble then, since we don't do much of disposable anything. It's amazing to see how much $$ gets thrown away every day in the form of diapers, wipes, paper towels, and even toilet paper.

If people were less concerned with the ultimate convenience, and more concerned with their personal impact on other living things, the world would surely be in better shape.

November 6, 2007 at 9:41 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

School officials warn about chicken pox cases

Copying my comment from the earlier article on this:

This being reported as news actually scares me. I hope society at large soon begins to think about a possible link between over-vaccination and the scads of auto-immune diseases that are becoming so prevalent. We're honestly supposed to be afraid of chicken pox now? There are many dollars to be made behind this fear mongering, at the expense of the health of the next generation. It's sickening.

October 4, 2007 at 4:41 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Chicken pox cases reported at two schools

This being reported as news actually scares me. I hope society at large soon begins to think about a possible link between over-vaccination and the scads of auto-immune diseases that are becoming so prevalent. We're honestly supposed to be afraid of chicken pox now? There are many dollars to be made behind this fear mongering, at the expense of the health of the next generation. It's sickening.

October 3, 2007 at 7:46 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Dispute erupts at Wal-Mart over ear-piercing of young girl

Manyblessings--it came into "vogue" in the United States in the 1800s.

Blackwalnut--people are often quick to decry female circumcision as worse than male, but once you look at all the facts, it isn't so cut and dry. Read here for further information:

www.noharmm.org/comparison.htm

July 5, 2007 at 11:23 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Dispute erupts at Wal-Mart over ear-piercing of young girl

People are throwing around what-ifs regarding female circumcision...why not open your eyes to the accepted mutilation done every day in the United States...MALE circumcision. Same damn thing--mutilation for unnecessary reasons. The more I've learned about it, the more horrified I have become. Do some research:

85 percent of the world's men are intact. And Viagra isn't too popular in Europe, if you catch my drift. Protect your sons!

# No national or international medical association recommends routine circumcision.
# Only the USA circumcises the majority of newborn boys without medical or religious reason.
# Circumcision began during the 1800s to prevent masturbation, which was believed to cause disease.
# Today's parents are learning that the foreskin is a normal, protective, functioning organ.
# Today's parents realize circumcision has risks and is unnecessary.
# Circumcision denies a male's right to genital integrity and choice for his own body.

http://www.nocirc.org/

July 5, 2007 at 10:38 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Bill would require HPV shot for girls

The following is all CDC-verifiable:

*HPV rarely causes invasive cervical cancer (there are only about 7,000 cases annually and 3,000 deaths), yet about SEVEN MILLION will get HPV annually.

*There are about 50 million women walking around with HPV right now.

*Smoking increases the risks

*Almost all women clear HPV from their bodies within two years and without any treatment

*The vaccine covers only two strains linked to cervical cancer

*Pap smears have reduced the incidence of cervical cancer by somewhere around 70% since the 50's.

*More than half of the cancer deaths occur in women who have never had a pap smear if their life.

Here are the VAERS reports for Gardasil so far. Keep in mind that the data contained in the VAERS database does not represent the true number of adverse reactions:
http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/fin....

Here is the pdf product insert.

http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_c...

There was no clear evidence of protection caused by HPV types for which subjects were PCR and/or seropositive at baseline.

Here are the contraindications: The product is not to be used for treatment of active genital warts, cervical cancer, CIN, VIN or VaIN. It is also not to be used on pregnant women. It has not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or genotoxicity.

Sorry to be so mouthy on the subject, but this HPV vaccination craze is really scary once you're privy to the statistics.

January 26, 2007 at 11:14 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Bill would require HPV shot for girls

There are no long term studies on this (or any) vaccine. Beware of your legal right to exemptions! NO VACCINES ARE "REQUIRED."

January 26, 2007 at 8:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Unlawful unions

"the gays"?

My, does Carl have a flair for English. Lame-o.

January 15, 2007 at 1:51 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Missouri St. should get the boot, KU fan says

Sounds like "Freedom Fries" to me. The state names are part of what I liked about L-town when I moved here.

January 6, 2007 at 7:12 a.m. ( | suggest removal )