robchestnut (Rob Chestnut)


Comment history

Editorial: System failure

The privatization of any public agency needs to be called into question. The concept that great efficiency is gained by this action has not proven out in this case nor any I can recall in Kansas or any other state. If cuts are necessary, I would much rather present the challenge of lower spending to an agency that is already in place versus a new vendor. The private sector is great for some things, but they are not always the answer.

March 31, 2016 at 10:19 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

City manager refuses to make decision on $1 million police over-hire, sends it to City Commission

This is a good decision by Mr. Markus that should place the responsibility for spending priorities with the elected officials.

March 29, 2016 at 7:31 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Editorial: School denial

This is not a liberal or conservative issue. A fundamental responsibility of the legislature is funding of public schools. The tug-of-war between the legislature and the court leaves school administrators unable to predict their budget funding for the next school year. Good teachers leave the profession, and Kansans will see the adverse effects for decades.

February 17, 2016 at 6:52 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Lawsuit filed against city over denial of south Iowa Street shopping center

There are a lot of comments across the board about the merits of development and who pays for infrastructure. However, at this point it is not relevant. The commission provided a vague interpretation of the zoning requirement for this piece of property. The property owner has the right to ask the court to decide whether or not their interpretation was reasonable. The commission does not have an exclusive right to approve or deny a request without good cause.

Mr. Heckler is correct that those who buy real estate take a risk for an expectation of return However, they also have the expectation that a predictable process will be in place to move forward. The current property owner who owns a property annexed into the City and paying property taxes (with special assessments for infrastructure) should have a reasonable expectation that they can obtain a return for their investment.

I am concerned that some of the discussion by the commission was directed at a desire to steer development to other pieces of property. It is bad precedent to select winners and losers when the focus should be on creating a level playing field for everyone.

In the end, all parties are pursuing their rights. The City has a right to defend its decision. The developers have a right to contest the ruling to judge its reasonableness.

This proposal demonstrates the challenge we have as a community to provide clarity regarding our development policy.

February 6, 2016 at 11:29 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Kansas senator blocks testimony from female witnesses with 'low-cut necklines and miniskirts'

He can't see the forest for the trees.

January 22, 2016 at 11:12 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Civil discourse

Well said Spencer. A balanced voice of hope for a better political future.

January 16, 2016 at 8:55 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Kansas to consider tightening limits on local property taxes

This entire dialog is missing an important point. As the State of Kansas continues to cut funding for social services, education and the arts, it is local government funding that has been forced to stem the tide. The problem with this legislation is that it does not take into account actions taken by the legislature to cut programs at the state level now being absorbed by municipalities.

I do not want to see increasing property taxes, but I also want to give my locally elected officials the flexibility to meet the needs in the community that the state chooses not to meet if the majority of its constituents supports the initiative.

Unfortunately, this is an attempt to push down the dogma of the state legislature to each and every local community. Regardless of the issue, it is not a good precedent on its face.

January 12, 2016 at 7:39 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Lawrence school district sees drop in operating cash despite spending less in 2015

The bigger issue is where do we go from here? The district is spending down fund balance despite lower operating expenditures, and the state budget is missing revenue projections again.

We may reach a point where the State will begin delays in transfers as was the case during the recession, and I believe that is unacceptable. The education funding situation must be stabilized. Regardless of your politics, it would seem reasonable that we can agree that a stable funding mechanism should be in place, and it is currently in a state of flux.

January 10, 2016 at 3:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Rejection of south Iowa Street shopping center sends confusing signals about future of south Lawrence growth

I think Chad does a great job of pointing to the somewhat uneven logic applied to this denial. The issue goes well beyond this particular project. It is the legitimate concern that Lawrence will suffer erosion on retail centers in other parts of the city as a result of a build up of retail on across the SLT.

However, I think the situation is different now than the past when most of the retail activity was in downtown and some adjacent retail centers. That has long past us now.

Perception is an important part of the political process regardless of the current reality. That is why the commission does need to direct planning to come up with a clear vision that can be supported related to development of that corridor.

If a new plan proposed leaving this area vacant, then we need to immediately stop making investments in infrastructure south of the SLT and focus our energy elsewhere.

January 7, 2016 at 7:43 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

City Commission rejects shopping development in south Lawrence

The commission needs to direct planning to review the Southern Development Plan which is essentially the area in question. It was adopted in late 2007, and it is out of date. An auto-related commercial center presents issues of its own with a lot of concrete and runoff. Given all that has transpired since 2007, and the fact that this area now has a lot of interest with the opening of the bypass, it is time for the planning department look at the uses and create some expectations for the next 20 years.

January 6, 2016 at 5:22 p.m. ( | suggest removal )