Comment history

Vital vaccines

MADE IN CHINA most vaccines are made in China. If they use lead in toys imagine what they put in vaccines.

January 20, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Vital vaccines

Where has common sense gone, shocking the LJWorld does not see that the expansion of the vaccine program is for profits. Pharma owns the media and runs the government with there advertisement dollars and campaign contributions. I see that LJ WORLD is part of the problem. We are no longer a free country. When you take away parents right to choose medical interventions for our children you have trambled the constitutional rights.. When your child is vaccine injured no one wants to help.
Vaccines are not risk free. If you read page 11 of the Tripedia package insert where it lists AUTISM as a potential adverse effect in post marketing data. How much "evidence" do you need to link vaccines with AUTISM when it is listed right on the label? And the fact that we have thousands of parents saying their children were injured? Read it for yourself:


Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting.
Sounds like autism to me.

January 20, 2012 at 8:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Bible housed at Baker University used on National Geographic cover

Congratulation Baker University, I will be sure to buy a copy!

November 17, 2011 at 8:10 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Vaccine injuries

SANE Vax.org believes that any product marketing as life-saving should be just that. The manufacturers of products mandated for public health and well-being have responsibility to live up to the nature of their claim. Anything less is a crime against humanity.
Either individually or collectively, it is important to write to urge the Supreme Court to uphold a citizen’s right as it currently exists to sue a pharmaceutical company for vaccine adverse reactions and to hold pharmaceutical companies responsible when they produce an unsafe vaccine product

According to a March 2010 Age of Autism article, The Supreme Court Takes Bruesewitz v. Wyeth: Is There Justice for Vaccine Injury Victims?, “…if the Supreme Court upholds Bruesewitz, it will basically achieve what the pharmaceutical industry and the American Medical Association wanted in 1986 and since - that so-called vaccine court is the “exclusive remedy” for cases of vaccine injury. They seek this “exclusive remedy” although it is anything but - because vaccine court fails those whom vaccines injured.
“The significance of the Bruesewitz case relates to all vaccine injury - it goes to the heart of whether Vaccine Court is fulfilling the role Congress set for it, and whether it is possible to challenge the design safety of a vaccine in any court in the United States. For the autism community, the case could not be more central - it will determine whether the 5,000 petitioners in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding can continue their claims in state and federal courts if Vaccine Court ultimately dismisses their claims.”
According to the New England Journal of Medicine-
Vaccine manufacturers have paid out $2B in damages from MMR & DPT vaccines.
As of 2007, 7000 more claims were going through the pipeline.
2,000 families have received compensation payments averaging $850,000 each.
Approximately 7,000 parents have filed a claim of an adverse reaction with America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). To win an award, the claimant must prove a causal link to a vaccine. As the medical establishment has refused to recognize any link to autism, the VICP has so far rejected 300 claims for this outright. (Source: New England Journal of Medicine)Medicine, 2007; 357: 1275-9)

October 10, 2010 at 8:04 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Vaccine injuries

Justice Roberts Sells Pfizer Shares Before Landmark Product Safety Case
Many Americans are unaware that vaccinations, a medical product with known side effects that can include death, are exempt from the standard jury trial system of every other product sold in the country. Drugs that you swallow, rub onto your body, take via IV infustion or even suppository - if they injure you - you can sue the manufacturer. Not so with vaccines. You have to face a special court run by the same government that approves the vaccines, often profits from their patents, mandates their use for your children and perhaps your job and promotes them via the US Public Health System using your tax dollars. You don't get a jury of your peers, you get a judge who works for the government.

A landmark case, challenging the inability to sue a vaccine manufacturer directly, will be heard by the US Supreme Court this week.

Supreme Court Set to Hear Historic Vaccine Injury Compensation Case Chief Justice to Hear Case Sells Pfizer Shares

PRLog (Press Release) – Oct 09, 2010 – North Hollywood, CA — On Tuesday, October 12 the Supreme Court in an unprecedented move will be hearing Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, Inc., now a unit of Pfizer. The hearing will determine whether Section 22(b)(1) of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 - which expressly preempts certain design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers. The historic case appeals a lower court decision that upheld a manufacturer’s immunity for a defectively designed vaccine. The outcome of this case will render important implications as to whether persons harmed by vaccines can ever - under any circumstances, sue a pharmaceutical company.
As the law stands now, a victim of vaccine injury must file in the Vaccine Court first, with a legal option to sue the manufacturer in some situations. It is this legal right that is in jeopardy and will be decided by the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
In a September 28, 2010, article The Wall Street Journal reported; Chief Justice Roberts Sells Pfizer Shares
In another case, the court is preparing to hear oral arguments next month to decide whether a federal law on vaccine injuries shields vaccine makers from certain types of product-liability lawsuits.
The case centers on a Pennsylvania lawsuit in which parents alleged that their 6-month-old daughter developed residual seizure disorder after receiving a vaccine manufactured by Wyeth, which is now a unit of Pfizer.
When the court announced in March that it would hear the case, it indicated that Justice Roberts was not participating. However, a recent docket entry this month no longer indicates that Justice Roberts is sitting out. The Sept. 3 entry notes only that Justice Kagan is recused.


October 10, 2010 at 7:59 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Vaccine injuries

We are talking about mercury, a poison that all agencies agree there is no safe level. We are directly injecting this poison into pregnant women, infants and small children. It does not belong in vaccines. The studies go back to the 40’s when Dr. Frank B. Engley studied thimerosal and found it to be toxic at one nano molar. Search for his paper form the AMA.

The Science is closed on the thimerosal issue by the manufacturers own words on the MSDS, we are now debating politics, who is responsible for the damage done. Guess who will pay for this, the taxpayers!

Everyone should support the 3 studies that have never been done, study multiple vaccines given at a single visit, study the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated population and study the normally developing children who got sick after vaccines. All 3 of my children were fully vaccinated according to the CDC schedule!

Read 2010 research by Catherine Desoto called “Sorting out the Spinning of Autism: Heavy Metals and the question of incidence.” Shows that 75 % of the peer reviewed studies support a link between vaccines and autism. The other 25%, all funded by conflicted industry support no link.

My son was diagnosed with autism at the age of 5, we later learned, through laboratory testing, he has mercury poisoning at over 3 times the highest acceptable level. After 8 years of biomedical treatment including chelation therapy he no longer exhibits the symptoms of autism.

We all have different genetics. To some penicillin is a deadly poison to others it is a miracle cure. Just like not all smokers get cancer, not all who get vaccines get mercury poisoning. A simple blood test at birth for MTHFR would identify those who can not handle vaccines with heavy metals. Due to my entire families homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase condition my sons methylation pathway did not function well enough to excrete the amount of mercury in his childhood vaccines following the 300 % increase in mercury containing vaccines included in the CDC schedule in 1992. All other environmental factors have been ruled out.

October 7, 2010 at 6:12 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Swine Flu clinic set for this week


Check out this CBS report

October 21, 2009 at 5:06 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

LMH says 2 people have been hospitalized with swine flu; 7 others have symptoms

How many cases of H1N1 will be created by the live nasal vaccine? The package insert states those who take the live nasal vaccine should stay away from immunocompromised persons. Hmmmm, my son and I have auto immune disease and a compromised immune system, how will I know who to stay away from. The live H1N1 nasal vaccine will cause the pandemic it is created to prevent.

October 21, 2009 at 3:03 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Swine flu vaccine plans develop

Dr. Mercola interviews famous neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock regarding flu vaccines, I imagine he knows a little more about the brain than cthulhu_4_president


September 22, 2009 at 6:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )