Comment history

Scoring Summary: KU-Baylor

Running up the score? Angus Q. hasn't played in a game all season. He shouldn't give it his all?

October 13, 2007 at 8:15 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Rose gets 10-year sentence

pissedinlawrence: Rose was found guilty in a court of law. Please explain your statement that he is not guilty.

June 19, 2007 at 9:29 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

K-State coach Huggins going to West Virginia

According to Fox Sports, Huggins was passed over the last time the job was avaliable at West Virginia.


April 5, 2007 at 3:49 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Wrong portrait

Dr King may not have been a gay marriage advocate, but he was an advocate of equal rights for ALL citizens. If he was alive today, I think he would support gay marriages because opposing gay marriages is opposing equal rights for everyone.

January 18, 2007 at 9:19 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Suspect in carjacking fails to appear in court

Shouldn't this man have been remanded until his court date because he led police on a car chase? As was already stated, are we surprised he didn't show up?

January 12, 2007 at 12:05 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Iowa left-turn limitation proposal shot down

So they approved the proposal on 9th street that will benefit a few homeowners, but would not approve the proposal for Iowa street that would benefit the entire town? Wow. That is really silly.

January 10, 2007 at 12:47 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Traffic-calming devices OK'd on Ninth Street

When people purchase houses do they not take into account where the house is located? How much traffic will pass by and at what speed? I would think that would be one of the most obvious things to consider.

My suggestion to everyone: pay attention to where the house you are buying is located. If you don't like how much traffic is on the street or if traffic is going too fast for you, don't buy that house. There are many many houses for sale in perfectly good neighborhoods that do not have traffic "issues".

January 10, 2007 at 12:29 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

The other Jayhawks - in Pennsylvania

KUweatherman: If copyright infringement only has to do with posing a threat, then how did Free State pose a threat to Temple University?

If Free State posed a threat to Temple, then this school is posing a threat to KU by using the Jayhawk name and the Jayhawk mascot. That was all I was saying. The laws of copyright infringement have to be applied equally, or should not be applied at all.

December 22, 2006 at 10:05 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

The other Jayhawks - in Pennsylvania

I did read the entire article. Which is why I said KU has more class than Temple. The point of posting my comment was to say that it hardly seems fair that Temple went after a high school in Lawrence, but KU will let this school use the mascot and the name.

December 22, 2006 at 10:02 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

The other Jayhawks - in Pennsylvania

It would only be fair if KU sued this school for copyright infringement. Why? When Free State opened, the Firebird had to be changed because Temple University threatened a lawsuit. In that case, the school wasn't trying to be the Free State Owls, but the Free State Firebirds. This high school has ripped off the mascot and the name. Why is that fair? I guess the only difference is that KU has more class than Temple does. This fact should at least be known.

December 22, 2006 at 2:39 p.m. ( | suggest removal )