heygary (Nellane Laney Croan Stussie)


Comment history

Letter to the editor: Pitts invaluable

”so-called President” with a furry orange head” ... can't decide if that is "generous and compassionate analysis, sharp but sympathetic sense of humor or deeply informed commentary.

February 25, 2017 at 3:48 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter to the editor: Pitts insightful

So much support for the 1st Amendment ... as long as what is being said echoes the liberal line! "A pervert that belongs in jail and on the sex offender list"? Probably more fitting description of Bill Clinton. Folks like Pitts (and Fred) set the stage for 8 years of President Trump ... hopefully followed by 8 years of our 1st female President ... Ivanka.

February 24, 2017 at 9:42 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter to the editor: Dump Pitts

Primary point of the letter was missed by most ... I don't mind liberal points of view (although they are pretty predictable and outnumber conservatives about 4 to 1 in the LJW) ... I question the need to for Pitts to mention the President's hair color and texture to make the point he is not happy HRC lost.

February 20, 2017 at 3:34 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter to the editor: Dump Pitts

2004 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary ... Is it really possible to be a failure in 30 days?

February 20, 2017 at 9:39 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter to the editor: A good night's sleep

So our system should let CA and NY elect all Presidents ... there is something bad in the water in those places.

February 17, 2017 at 9:06 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Letter to our so-called president

We just lived through eight years of consolidating power and corrupting the agencies in the Executive branch and you are comparing 3 weeks of President Trump to Nazi Germany. Amazing!

February 17, 2017 at 8:59 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter to the editor: A good night's sleep

Well said! Wonder how long the tantrum is going to last?

February 17, 2017 at 8:37 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter to the editor: Judicial respect

Appears to me you all are missing the point. Judicial branch exists to weigh actions against existing laws and the constitution. Real danger is when unelected Judges (at any level) legislate from the bench.

February 17, 2017 at 8:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Opinion: Miami officials should thank Argentine president

"... wasted her country’s biggest commodity bonanza in recent history giving away massive cash subsidies to buy votes, but doing little to ensure long-term poverty reduction ... A staggering 45 percent of Argentines are getting paid on a monthly basis by the government, either because they are public employees or because they are getting cash subsidies..."

Sounds real familar! The US would have been here long ago were it not for the fact we are the world's currency standard.

October 7, 2013 at 7:37 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Shame on state

One only has to decide if the offending group, individual, topic, or word involved is on the PRO or CON side of the liberal play-list to predict their collective response. The only thing typically consistent with these self-appointed defenders of the 1st Amendment is the hope that he “settle for a large chunk of change”. Were we to apply the current standard consistently, Guth’s rant was hate speech, pure and simple. He has no place in a taxpayer funded University!

October 6, 2013 at 9:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )