Comment history
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Two men arrested in connection with Club Magic shooting May 20, 2013 · 24 comments
- Death toll from Oklahoma City tornado climbs to 91, expected to rise May 20, 2013 · 20 comments
- Opinion: Benghazi triggers a major credibility crisis May 18, 2013 · 66 comments
- Blog: As planners debate Menards project, new study finds retail vacancy rate at 7.2 percent citywide May 20, 2013 · 22 comments
- Blog: As Legislature remains deadlocked, Brownback in Chicago touting tax cuts May 20, 2013 · 23 comments
- Planning Commission recommends approval of Menards store for south Lawrence May 20, 2013 · 8 comments
- Opinion: Scandals undermine trust in Obama May 19, 2013 · 44 comments
- Gas prices approach record highs May 18, 2013 · 43 comments
- Blog: Kansas science and math teachers easily recruited away May 20, 2013 · 7 comments
- When furniture turned into art: Wendell Castle's KU connection May 19, 2013 · 8 comments
- Daytripper: We're in the money May 20, 2013
- Memphis forward Tarik Black transfers to KU May 20, 2013
- Two Topeka men shot in Lawrence early Sunday morning; police seeking persons of interest May 19, 2013
- For Kansas basketball, recruiting never ceases May 20, 2013
- Expanding rooftop garden at KU Union provides herbs, vegetables for campus May 16, 2013
- Project to build intergenerational retirement community in Lawrence moving ahead April 29, 2013
- Editorial: Hometown pride May 21, 2013
- KU makes sudden change in Statehouse presence May 20, 2013
- Two men arrested in connection with Club Magic shooting May 20, 2013
- Sun shines on KU graduates' smiles as they celebrate commencement May 19, 2013
Joe-College.com ordered to pay Kansas Athletics more than $660,000
1. This was a jury verdict. The judge is not the trier of fact. It is for the jury to decide if the defendant violated the plaintiff's rights.
2. It was incumbent upon the defense attorney to ask for the judge to recuse herself if he believed that there was a conflict of interest (which, under the legal definition, there was not).
3. The defendant was a sophisticated businessman who had actual notice from the university that he was infringing on their copyright. He knows, or had reasonable knowledge, that he was violating the University's copyright.
4. Despite the previous warnings and offers to settle by the university, Larry continued to sell his products.
5. If all of you who are on Larry's side on this, please send me your names and I will be happy to do similar T-shirts with your names (which, by the way, would be actionable).
Bottom line, he knew what he was doing, he had warning to stop and save himself money, he chose not to. I don't feel bad for him.
September 30, 2009 at 8:03 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )