Comment history
- Tarik Black strong, physical May 22, 2013
- Opinion: Wayne Selden sizes up recruits May 21, 2013
- Opinion: Scandals undermine trust in Obama May 19, 2013
- City accepts recreation center bids, but won' t proceed with building until Fritzel provides infrastructure costs May 21, 2013
- Editorial: Judicial joust May 22, 2013
- LHS student earns perfect ACT score May 21, 2013
- Fix-It Chick: Gutter repair May 20, 2013
- KU makes sudden change in Statehouse presence May 20, 2013
- Budget cuts force Head Start to close Edgewood Homes facility May 21, 2013
- Local organizations aim to support tornado victims May 21, 2013
Religion professor's e-mail outrages critics
I'm going to go with the Vatican's assessment on creation.
["Vatican City - The Vatican's chief astronomer said Friday that "intelligent design" is not science and does not belong in science classrooms, the latest high-ranking Roman Catholic official to enter the evolution debate in the United States.
Rev. George Coyne, the Jesuit director of the Vatican Observatory, said placing intelligent design theory alongside that of evolution in school programs is "wrong" and is akin to mixing apples with oranges."]
Who here believes in the the sun god apollo or rah? I sure don't. Religion of today is the mythology of the future. Religion changes as a function anthropological evolution. As we understand our universe better, the farther we have to reach to insert "god" as a plausible explanation. The truth will either be a single god, multiple gods or no god, and no amount of belief with change the truth; whatever that my prove to be. However if the truth lies in Heaven or Hell, then I prefer to be forgotten and vanish into oblivion. I would find an eternity of that foolishness intolerable.
November 25, 2005 at 1:49 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )