Comment history

Doubters still await warming evidence

More about ClimateGate


There is a coverup.

February 22, 2010 at 10:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

I wish you would have sent me a reliable source. However, I read the "hacked" emails.
Quote from RealClearPolitics ( A Right Wing source but this time they are accurate)

"This scandal goes beyond scientific journals and into other media used to promote the global warming dogma. For example, RealClimate.org has been billed as an objective website at which global warming activists and skeptics can engage in an impartial debate. But in the CRU e-mails, the global warming establishment boasts that RealClimate is in their pocket.

I wanted you guys to know that you're free to use RC in any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through.... We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you'd like us to include.

[T]hink of RC as a resource that is at your disposal.... We'll use our best discretion to make sure the skeptics don't get to use the RC comments as a megaphone.

And anyone doubting that the mainstream media is in on it, too, should check out New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin's toadying apologia for the CRU e-mails, masquerading as a news report."

February 22, 2010 at 10:11 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

The orbital wobble will very slowly start to cool our winters and gradually lead to an increase in polar ice during the winter and increased melting during the summer. Of course that's for the next 22,000 years.

February 22, 2010 at 9:28 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

That is a nice informational post.

Do you have the information on where we are in the cycle?

February 22, 2010 at 9:01 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Obama to propose federal limits on health insurance rates

LIBERTY-ONE "Because they are conservatives. That means they only believe in free markets when it suits them, but their real core is nationalism. Liberals like myself believe in free markets and personal freedom all the time."

Don't confuse the neo-cons of GW with conservatives. I am a conservative. I completely despise both the Demonrat and Repukelican parties.

February 22, 2010 at 8:55 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

I admit they are a conservative newspaper, but look up the people and the studies they quote.

I also read the Guardian, The London Times, The Wall Street Journal, The San Francisco Chronicle, and the New York Times, Washington Post., and a few others. How about you?

February 22, 2010 at 8:16 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

a_flock_of_jayhawks , It wasn't you who attacked. cg22165 is the attacker.

I can't believe that some people actually use wikipedia.com as a source.

Global warming conspiracy theory

jkilgore = misinformed
I just use your source to "prove" the opposite.

Show me a valid temperature study and something that proves the sun and earth's orbital wobble aren't causing the warming. Then I'll believe you.

February 22, 2010 at 8:08 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

I posted the wrong link. Unfortunately I lost my original but here is a story that contains much of the same data.

February 22, 2010 at 7:56 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Doubters still await warming evidence

I really wish that people who are debating issues, would refrain from personal attacks.

February 22, 2010 at 7:40 p.m. ( | suggest removal )