Advertisement

d_thompson (Douglas Thompson)

Follow

Comment history

Letter: Police investment

Mr. Herington is a multimillionaire who makes his money from government work. Of course he is in favor of more taxes, he makes his money off the government. Besides a sales tax increase isn't going to hurt him and his tens of millions of dollars while he lives in his mansion.

If he was so concerned about the facility maybe he can donate the money to pay for it. Maybe if he hadn't been fined $200,000 by the SEC for violating securities laws he could have used that money to pay for the new police station.

October 22, 2014 at 10:28 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

KU Student Body president: Fieldhouse seat change-up 'unfortunate'

What did the student government think was going to happen when they picked a fight with KUAC? Did they really think KUAC was just going to say no big deal that you cut funding to us? Some version of this was 100% predictable.

June 9, 2014 at 8:38 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

Whew, thank goodness, we can stop worrying about the actuarial data, MerriAnnie has us covered. Her broad sample of people consisting of the people she knows has now clarified that enrollment consists only of healthy people. The matter is settled MerriAnnie has spoken to people.

First, when this was first passed it was determined that 40% of the enrollment needed to be young people to make it sustainable. Now we have less than 30% in the pool. Second, it doesn't take any specific expertise to know that those people who are more ill are more likely to sign up for coverage. If you want to see an example of the problem, read the article above. Lady needs expensive care....buys the best insurance plan.

May 4, 2014 at 3:26 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

Hey John, you are making my point while trying to disagree with me. I am saying that if the rates rise they have more money in which to extract their 20%. Lets say they have premiums of $10, they can spend $2 on non-healthcare expenses. Now lets say that rates skyrocket and premiums are $20, they can now spend $4 on non-healthcare expenses.

The more expensive the insurance is, the more money the insurance companies get to line their pockets. If they reduce the cost of insurance, they can't keep as many dollars as if they work to increase the cost. 20% of a larger number is.... a larger number.

The nice link you provided was EXACTLY what i was talking about.

If you told Walmart they can keep 20% of every can of soda they sold and then said everyone had to buy a can of soda would Walmart want to sell the soda for $1.00 or $50.00? The 80% restriction is a DISINCENTIVE for keeping rates down.

May 2, 2014 at 6:13 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

James, that is not right. First the 87% number was estimated by HHS of those who took subsidies, not of all people. Secondly, they said the numbers may not be that reliable:

Officials said that 87 percent of people who applied for subsidies via the federal exchange HealthCare.gov — which sells policies in 36 states — reported lacking insurance at that time, in response to a question that was asked on that Web site. But officials told reporters that because of independent surveys which have shown that a majority of Obamacare enrollees had previously been insured, along with other factors, made the 87 percent uninsured statistic unreliable.

May 2, 2014 at 2:51 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

I have no idea what you mean when you say that her ability to raise everyone's rates is limited by a narrow enrollment period? As for adding everyone into the risk pool, the ACA has utterly failed to add everyone to the risk pool. It has successfully added the sick to the risk pool and some people who are healthy, but it absolutely positively has not added everyone into the risk pool.

May 2, 2014 at 2:42 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

That is what I am talking about. You can't ask for cooperation from people when telling them they are bad people.

Republicans are wrong on a lot of things, but insulting them and assuming you know their motives is not helping anything. Do all republicans care about poor people, no. Do many, yes.

May 2, 2014 at 12:54 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

Scott, they aren't going to dip into their profits, they are simply going to raise rates which makes it more expensive for all. Since there were limits on what they can spend on operations, the higher the rates the more they can spend. This includes salaries and bonuses. In other words, the insurers are not interested in keeping the costs low, they are interested in raising rates - which is easier to do when coverage is mandated.

But the only way to fix this is for both sides to stop with the hyper partisanship. The republicans need to stop saying the democrats are socialists and the democrats need to stop saying that republicans hate poor people and want them to die. That doesn't advance the national conversation.

May 2, 2014 at 12:43 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Number of Kansans who signed up for insurance through marketplace exceeds government's expectations

We should absolutely be working to expand health coverage to those who need it, but this is not the way to do it. Here is a perfect example of why this is not sustainable:

"Beer bought a platinum plan, which covers 90 percent of health care costs, because she had some expensive medical procedures coming up."

You can't let people buy insurance this way, it isn't insurance anymore. Lets have a national conversation about healthcare - we as a country owe that to ourselves. But regardless of which side of the aisle you are on, the ACA is not a good solution. If things like the above continue to happen it breaks down the system which will be more harmful for the long term expansion of health coverage for all.

May 2, 2014 at 6:25 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Ruling: Kansas can strip Planned Parenthood funds

Chris, it is very common for federal funds to be allocated to the States for distribution via their criteria under the guidelines of the federal program. Medicaid is a perfect example.

March 25, 2014 at 9:27 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Previous