Breaking news

Freed: Cheick Diallo finally cleared by NCAA updated 2 hours, 28 minutes ago

citizen1 (David Reynolds)


Comment history

Freed: Cheick Diallo finally cleared by NCAA

We are discussing Mr. Diallo's reputation. The NCAA has no right to tarnish Mr. Diallo's precious reputation. Why wasn't this mentioned when the NCAA contacted the KU Athletic Director on Monday?

Unless the evidence of amateurism is immediately presented by the NCAA the person, at the NCAA who is saying this, should be immediately terminated.

November 25, 2015 at 5:47 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Freed: Cheick Diallo finally cleared by NCAA

According to the NCAA they said they were concerned about amateurism?

When was this known? Why wan't KU advised? Why is this information released today?

I believe the NCAA has stated a bold faced lie regarding Mr. Diallo based on the the information available.

I believe the NCAA fabricated the issue of amateurism to deflect attention away from their incompetent mishandling of the Diallo case.

If am athlete lied to the NCAA the student would be punished. The NCAA can lie about a student with impunity?

Where is this amateurism information NCAA, and why didn't you advise KU regarding this subject?

If the determination was that there was a "...a limited amount of extra benefits", then why didn't the NCAA release this information early on, issue the 5 game suspension at that time, & clear Mr. Diallo then? Why the delay? Why all the fuss about course work & the legal guardian status of Mr. Drame when the issue was amateurism?

November 25, 2015 at 5:10 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Marc, excellent question "...Outline what our climate should be...".

That is one of the key questions we should be asking, instead of the constant droning on from "The Governing Establishment" & their pawns, repeating the same tired comments, that never lead to a real discussion.

Congratulations for your critical thinking. :))

November 23, 2015 at 11:29 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Been a full day. Just checked in to see responses to my last post and I see two gentlemen have been very busy...funny.

To paraphrase a line from Hamlet: "The gentlemen doth protest too much, methinks".

November 22, 2015 at 7:24 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Ken you are so taken in by "The Governing Establishment".

Ask your self a simple question: "Why would NOAA issue a false report about the climate just weeks before the Paris conference on Climate Change?"

Let me help you out with the answer: "It's about creating the illusion of's about's about influence".

The real subject is not about how the planet works...the real subject is politics and manipulation.

I am just hoping that the average citizens grasps that point and realizes the costs to themselves & contacts Washington to stop this gambit before it is too late. Then we can discuss real facts.

Good night Ken.

November 22, 2015 at 12:08 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Ken you just don't get it or you don't want to. Your still caught up playing the roll of a pawn. It must be hard trying to get off the addiction.

Man Made Climate Change is not about facts, it's about about creating an illusion of facts. The sooner you grasp that the better off you will be.

As I said earlier, you bring the wrong arguments to a political fight.

Good luck Ken.

November 21, 2015 at 9:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Ken your response is entirely predictable, denial, demean & deflect. You are caught in a terrible place, a place where you are trying to argue with facts, tainted by the proven history of data manipulation & outright fraud, to try to justify that climate change is man made.

You don’t see that the man made climate change argument is no longer about facts…it’s all about politics. It’s all about the Al Gore’s & the billionaires that support man made global warming getting richer. It’s all about the 1%’rs becoming the 0.01%’rs, it’s all about societal control. Let’s call the promoters you support, “The Governing Establishment”. You have been so caught up being one of the “faithful to the cause” that you missed the gambit…you are the pawn.

It’s your blind belief that keeps the charade going and supports the objectives of “The Governing Establishment”, their moving closer to total control & absolute wealth. You and I being the pawns will pay for it all.

You see the only reason the charade is going on is because the money is still flowing into the coffers to promote further studies to keep it in the headlines until there purpose is served. Then it will be too late.

The whole “Man Made Climate Change” argument ceased being scientific when “The Governing Establishment & their pawns, people like you” started ignoring the data that showed the original data & current reports were & are flawed. You see the charade works as long as the pawns continue to believe & proselytize. As soon as the cracks start to form with the pawns, the truth will be exposed, the charade & then the real story regarding any climate change will emerge.

Until that day Ken, you are bringing the wrong arguments to the wrong type of fight, and you will continue being their pawn.

I know you will try to argue against me by demeaning & obfuscation, but to no avail.

Sorry to have to be the barer of the truth, but you will never hear it from the folks you support.

November 21, 2015 at 8:11 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Sorry Ken your attempt at demeaning my comment is typical of climate alarmists that are threatened by facts & do not have quality responses that add to the conversation.

There are problems with any climate discussion. The discussion is it's political & not scientific. The alarmists want it both ways. Alarmists want to present what they claim are facts & then ignore evidence to the contrary. Until the alarmists, their media & other accomplices admit that the information passing as science is corrupted, manipulated, always assumes the worst case, plus admit their climate models are woefully inadequate to the task intended, their can be no meaningful discussion.

We have way too many professors & scientists willing to sell their souls to get grant money to support their careers. Too many "friendly" & not objective" peer reviewed papers.

Even the IPCC has had to back off some of their positions when confronted with evidence they could not ignore lest they be embarrassed further.

So until you and your fellow alarmists can absolutely prove the data used is not false, corrupted, or manipulated to support a preconceived position; or that past positions were wrong (like polar bears are dying & Antarctica ice is decreasing, denying there has not been any significant warming in 19 years, etc), there can be no meaningful discussion.

“In an interview with Andrew Orlowski of The Register, Dr. Freeman Dyson expressed his despair at the current scientific obsession with climate change which he says is “not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to the obvious facts.”

"This mystery, says Dyson, can only partly be explained in terms of follow the money. Also to blame, he believes, is a kind of collective yearning for apocalyptic doom.

The climate models used by alarmist scientists to predict global warming are getting worse, not better; carbon dioxide does far more good than harm; and President Obama has backed the “wrong side” in the war on “climate change.”

So says one of the world’s greatest theoretical physicists, Dr Freeman Dyson, the British-born, naturalized American citizen who worked at Princeton University as a contemporary of Einstein and has advised the US government on a wide range of scientific and technical issues.”

Ken I suppose you and your fellow alarmists want to argue against someone of the quality of Fr. Freeman Dyson.

November 21, 2015 at 2:40 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

Continued from above.
This is clearly shown by the most reliable global temperature dataset – the RSS satellite records – and was even grudgingly acknowledged in the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment report. While still insisting that there has been a slight warming – an increase, since 1998, of around 0.05 degrees C per decade – the IPCC had in all honesty to admit that this is smaller than the 0.1 degrees C error range for thermometer readings, and consequently statistically insignificant.

But if there has been no “global warming” for nearly 19 years how can alarmist proselytisers like President Obama and John Kerry possibly hope to convince an increasingly skeptical public that this apparently non-existent problem yet remains the most pressing concern of our age?”

In other news NASA has issued a report proving that the Antarctica ice sheet is actually growing versus claims by climate alarmists.

“Antarctica is growing not shrinking, according to the latest study from NASA. Furthermore, instead of contributing to rising sea levels, the still-very-much-frozen southern continent is actually reducing them by 0.23 mm per year.

Unlike previous studies – many largely based on guesswork because the continent is so vast and inhospitable, meaning that data is extremely limited – they use satellite altimeters to calculate changes in the surface height of the ice. What they show is that the amount of ice lost by glaciers collapsing into the sea has been exceeded by the gain in ice mass from accumulated snow.

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.”

Sorry Mike but people who try to understand all sides of the issue are not in agreement with the climate alarmist claims.

November 21, 2015 at 10:49 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Real climate threat

John, President Obama is placing US citizens & property in great peril with his current promotion of continuing to take Syrian refugees. Obama wants 10K more Syrian refugees in the USA before we have the capacity to properly vet them. According to recent comments by "House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul & FBI Director James Comey we do not have adequate procedures to properly screen these refugees.

According to a recent news article: “The administration’s claims about the refugees screening process are also hard to believe. House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul has called the president’s plan to bring in Syrian refugees a “federally sanctioned welcome party” to potential terrorists because the screening process is so inadequate. FBI Director James Comey has said the federal government does not have the ability to conduct thorough background checks on Syrian refugees.

The reasons for this are that most Syrian refugees have no documentation, the U.S. has no information on them and there’s no way to consult their records in Syria.”

Adding to this problem recent news stories are also telling us that these refugees have false identification.

With regard to your claim that climate is the real threat…threat to what. And the claim that over 97 percent of climate scientists are convinced is caused by our burning fossil fuels. Sorry, Mike but the 97% number has been debunked. Continuing to push this false claim is as bad as the false data supporting so called man made climate change. It’s the exposure of the continued discovery of false data being presented that is hindering the acceptance of global warming.

I will not go into the specifics of past falsehoods. If you are not aware of them please look them up it is enlightening. In the past I have presented them several times here. Instead let’s just focus on today’s NOAA's deliberate presentation of false data & NASA new report regarding Antartica ice sheet..

Recent articles have questioned NOAA’s release the data supporting a report stating that there has been no pause in global warming. NOAA refuses…hummm.
The US government’s main climate research agency, NOAA, has refused a request by House Republicans to release key documents concerning the controversial issue of whether or not there has been a “pause” in global warming. The article goes on to say” “At the root of the issue is the inconvenient truth that there has been no “global warming” since January 1997.

Comment Continued Below.

November 21, 2015 at 10:46 a.m. ( | suggest removal )