Morichalion (Glenn Reed)

Follow

Comment history

US Sen. Roberts' 'Frozen' ringtone creates hearing hysterics

Kevin, stop this.

Military service has nothing to do with the issue at hand. And you know this.

Just let it go.

April 18, 2015 at 12:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

US Sen. Roberts' 'Frozen' ringtone creates hearing hysterics

Kevin, honestly...

The "reasoned argument" was before the "dirtbag" comment. Though, his reasoned argument had little-to-nothing to do with the issue at hand.

Your military service has nothing to do with this story. Neither does Philipp's. Even Senator Roberts' military record is moot, as his military career ended 40 some-odd years back.

Roberts' current job is Senator. Phil comment suggested that Roberts' fails to show up to his job on a more-than-median basis.

I found evidence to confirm Phil's claim. Can you provide evidence that he's wrong?

I get where you might be frustrated at the "dirtbag" comment. He's just trying to defend people he likes, probably not the best way to go about it.

If the burn really hurts that bad, I'd suggest a nice plush toy. That snowman character from Frozen, Olaf, is right about the perfect shape to cuddle with. Might help with emotional distress.

April 18, 2015 at 12:35 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

US Sen. Roberts' 'Frozen' ringtone creates hearing hysterics

There's no point in trying to have any level of reasoned argument with Mr. Goenhagen, he's just no capable of it. At least, I have not seen him demonstrate any such competency.

That said, military service doesn't strike me as something that matters when discussing people who hold political office.

So far as Mr. Roberts is concerned, the only discussions of substance to be had are about how he's performing his job as senator, and if another person be a better choice next time around.

April 17, 2015 at 11:53 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

US Sen. Roberts' 'Frozen' ringtone creates hearing hysterics

Mildly amusing, but why does anyone care?

More to the point, why do people care more about his ringtone more than his role as an elected official?

April 17, 2015 at 9:02 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Kansas government agency slams 'left' in Facebook post on welfare reform

Is that what the spokeswoman said. Really not sure why the DCF should announce a public opinion on the issue. Policy is decided elsewhere.

The DCF is out of bounds with this facebook post. They have a job, and commentary just isn't it.

April 13, 2015 at 4:20 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

'The Daily Show' roasts recent Kansas legislation

I want to know how many times we have to be featured on The Daily Show before we get free smoothies or something.

April 10, 2015 at 4:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

'The Daily Show' roasts recent Kansas legislation

Not sure you'd know, he doesn't have a show on Fox, and tends to be somewhat centrist in his selection of targets.

April 10, 2015 at 4:21 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Lawrence school district expects to repay $672,000 in state aid

Phillipp was rude, there's no doubt on that.

The thing is, you've done nothing, nothing at all, to suggest that he's wrong in his assessment. You aren't even trying.

April 7, 2015 at 1:19 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Lawrence school district expects to repay $672,000 in state aid

The funding issue, which you're trying desperately to not speak of, is alive and well. The dead horse thing applies for an issue that's over.

In this context, it's what we should be talking about. Either try to smooth over the sudden loss of funds, or decry the government for handling it so very wrongly.

You have no intelligent argument for the sudden shift in funding, otherwise you'd have mentioned it somewhere. If I'm wrong in this assessment, please tell me if you think our school district having to pay back money already earmarked for salaries is a good thing or a bad thing.

April 7, 2015 at 12:52 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Lawrence school district expects to repay $672,000 in state aid

Mr. Goenhagen,

You should look up "Red Herring." All of the text you've posted in the comment section of this article qualifies as a school of red herring.

You have no intelligent argument for the sudden shift in funding, otherwise you'd have mentioned it somewhere.

April 7, 2015 at 12:03 p.m. ( | suggest removal )