Guardian (Jim Phillips)

Follow

Comment history

Letter: Clinton lie

And there is no doubt in my mind that if Hillary told you blue was red, you would believe that too. That's one of the great things about America, you can be as gullible as you like.

October 31, 2015 at 9:17 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Clinton lie

But there is this...http://www.eohistory.info/2013/hillaryHistory.htm

October 31, 2015 at 5:07 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Clinton lie

Nevermind! I stand corrected. There have been calls for her being disbarred, but it was never accomplished. My bad!

October 31, 2015 at 4:57 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Clinton lie


October 31, 2015 at 4:49 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Clinton lie

She was disbarred for lying, so....

October 30, 2015 at 7:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Federal court: Ex-Lawrence police sergeant in KU ticket scandal not fired for racist reasons

Better questions: 1.) What difference does it make whether or not Mr. Corliss was named in the lawsuit? 2.) Who cares?

August 22, 2015 at 4:49 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Guns and liquor could be mixing at your local bar

Thank you for the information.

August 10, 2015 at 10:15 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Guns and liquor could be mixing at your local bar

Lawrence has a city ordinance that prohibits the possession of a firearm within 200 feet of a bar, unless you are passing by or near a bar in your travel from point A to point B. I am not aware of that ordinance being repealed, even by the new concealed law. If the ordinance is still valid, it's illegal to carry a weapon into a bar within the city limits.

August 9, 2015 at 8:26 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Gun control

We have.

August 8, 2015 at 8:23 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Letter: Gun control

It's funny, Mr. Hamill, how Constitutional scholars disagree with your interpretation of the Second Amendment. Once again, because I have stated this before, prior to 1968, if one had a Sears and Roebuck or a Montgomery Wards catalog and a charge card, an adult could call the store, give the clerk the card number, page number, item number of the firearm you wanted to buy, and it would be delivered to your door step in less than a week. Then came the hue and cry for "sensible gun laws". There was a brief fight, but the gun lobby gave in and we got the Gun Control Act of 1968. All was well with the world...until 1969, when the request came out for "sensible gun laws", which eventually came. And all was well with the world...until 1970, when the nation demanded "sensible gun laws". You can repeat this scenario for nearly every year from 1968 to 2015. Gun laws now are more restrictive and more abundant than they ever have been in the history of this country, and yet you still cry for "sensible gun laws". Apparently, anti-gunners, (I prefer to call them anti Constitutonalists) cannot decide on a sensible definition of "sensible". Also, once again, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1789. The Militia Act was not passed until 1792, thus making your militia argument moot.

August 8, 2015 at 4 p.m. ( | suggest removal )