Rec center support

I'm suprised that you only found that one error. I did not proof read at all today. I just didn't feel like it. CC sez....If we build it, they will come policy has never worked. Not with gas prices rising. It is a lot cheaper to visit Lawrence and live in KC or Topeka.

August 16, 2012 at 12:59 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

If there any criteria regarding how many times a certain idea can be stated? Can overstatement of an idea be grounds for shunning or being yanked down? How about nasty attitudes to fellow contributers? Just want to be clear as to what I am allowed to think and write.

August 16, 2012 at 12:31 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

I know that I should stop, but this is really fun, and after all, I was really bored.

August 16, 2012 at 12:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

Wow, you can do that on a blog? Oh, wait....I just replied. I wonder what will happen?

August 16, 2012 at 12:17 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

P.S., you really are a ____________ ___. Is that better?

August 16, 2012 at 12:01 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

Thank you for getting over me. See you in the funny papers.

August 16, 2012 at 11:58 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

Hey, that's as far as you get in writing skills when you are a finance or computer science major. "I believe that we should believe politicians".. ... HAHAHAHAHAHa

August 16, 2012 at 11:55 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

Chuckle. I gather you get your jollies debating with bloggers. I'm just putting out my ideas/opinions for fun. I'm a bored housewife, get it? I will continue to blog as I please. Go pick on someone who wants to argue with you!

August 16, 2012 at 11:11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

[Big Sigh] I would just once like to see this headline: DEVELOPERS OFFER TO DONATE LAND FOR REC CENTER IN HOPES OF GETTING SOMETHING MOVING ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE CITY.

Or

CITY COMMISSION TO DISCUSS REC CENTER AS A MEANS OF JUMP-STARTING LAWRENCES' FALTERING GROWTH RATE.

Now stop being such a pompous a___. This is a blog. It is perfectly acceptable to post whatever you want.

August 16, 2012 at 10:58 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )

Rec center support

Great propaganda from the Bureau of Brown-Nosers. Just once, I would like to hear the real story on the Rec. Center. Just who all is pushing this and why.

Ex: Schwada and Fritzell are for this because it will provide additional occupancy and value to their land investments/plans.

Ex: The Parks and Rec Department are for this because our facilities are outdated, and at times overcrowded.

Ex: The wannabe junior power brokers are for this because, well, they are what they are.

Okay, I'm just dreaming.

August 16, 2012 at 10:31 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )