Comment history

Rumsfeld rules


July 21, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Religious justice

I don't think the issues presented in this letter are about religious freedom or the environment at all. Rather, it is about preserving the dwindling cultural relevance and influence of indigenous peoples in modern society. I sympathize with this author's viewpoint, but disagree with the opposition to the traffic way based on cultural preservation. Society has a right to progress and commerce and cultural preservation is not strong enough grounds to block it in this scenario. The court was right to affirm the decision to build the traffic way.

July 18, 2012 at 10:28 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Let us reason together. - Can we afford all that we WANT?

Heh, wait a minute. I am wealthy and do not support the budgeting process, or any uncontrolled spending. Please lay blame at the people proposing the projects or rate increases, not those who are in agreement with you :)

June 22, 2012 at 9:14 a.m. ( | suggest removal )