Sound Off
Sound Off: I’m confused about how the city elects its mayor. How does the process work?
The five commissioners on the Lawrence City Commission choose a commissioner to serve as mayor for a one-year term. The selection occurs each April. Commissioners are free to vote for any commissioner they choose, but in most years they have followed an unwritten rule of electing the vice mayor to serve as mayor. Commissioners normally choose the vice mayor based on the number of votes a commissioner received during the public election that happens once every two years. For example, in the first year following a City Commission election, the top vote-getter is traditionally chosen by commissioners to serve as vice mayor. In the second year following a City Commission election, the second place winner in the election is traditionally chosen by commissioners to serve as vice mayor. The system basically ensures that the top two vote winners in an election each will serve a one-year term as mayor.
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Senate Republicans approve sales tax increase, cuts in income tax rates, lower food sales tax May 23, 2013 · 59 comments
- Former area Boy Scouts react to decision allowing gay scouts May 24, 2013 · 14 comments
- Long-term plan suggests toll lanes on K-10 corridor May 23, 2013 · 50 comments
- Opinion: Why gay role models matter May 23, 2013 · 37 comments
- Proposed cuts to corrections system could endanger Kansans, secretary says May 24, 2013 · 12 comments
- 59 minors, several local businesses, cited for alcohol violations in state regulator's patrols in May May 23, 2013 · 28 comments
- House rejects Senate-approved tax package; Legislature adjourns; new plan teed up May 24, 2013 · 10 comments
- CEO Gene Meyer honored for leading Lawrence Memorial Hospital to success May 23, 2013 · 12 comments
- Republican tax plans would increase state revenue, analyses say May 22, 2013 · 51 comments
- On the street: Should residents or businesses who use too much water be fined? May 24, 2013 · 16 comments
- Former Lawrence resident Sri Srinivasan confirmed for prestigious D.C. Court of Appeals May 23, 2013
- Wildflower Walk set for Saturday May 24, 2013
- FSHS softball season ends in extra-inning heartbreak at state May 24, 2013
- Kobler to lead shift toward 'technology-rich' classrooms May 23, 2013
- Long-term plan suggests toll lanes on K-10 corridor May 23, 2013
- Lawrence man pleads guilty to bank robbery; 52-month sentence recommended May 20, 2013
- Affordable Care Act bringing jobs to Lawrence May 16, 2013
- KU softball’s Maggie Hull named Academic All-American May 24, 2013
- KU track qualifies four for NCAA Outdoor Championship May 24, 2013
- Senate Republicans approve sales tax increase, cuts in income tax rates, lower food sales tax May 23, 2013
Comments
xyz 1 year, 1 month ago
After reading the JW response, if the Sound Off writer is still confused (highly likely!), see Kansas Statutes Annotated 12-1003 and 1007 and the Lawrence City Code, Article 1-202 and 203 for less confusing wording on form of government, number of commissioners and terms of office, and election of the mayor and vice mayor.
sad_lawrencian 1 year, 1 month ago
The policy is outdated and backwards. The mayor of Lawrence should be chosen based on popular election. Other cities also have a city manager-council form of government (see: Wichita) but also elect a mayor at-large who occupies a seat on the city council. There is absolutely no reason why Lawrence should not follow suit. The current system is akin to the time when state legislators, and not the people, elected senators. The system of appointment of mayors in Lawrence should stop.
nativeson 1 year, 1 month ago
If we really wanted to get progressive, Lawrence and Douglas County should combine for a unified government. About 86% of the residents of Douglas County live in the City of Lawrence.
CLARKKENT 1 year, 1 month ago
HOW DOES IT WORK?----NOT VERY WELL!!!
skinny 1 year, 1 month ago
Yes, It is time for a change. The current system is dated.
RoeDapple 1 year, 1 month ago
The "Good Old Boy" system. Not very progressive there, Larryville . . .
50YearResident 1 year, 1 month ago
How can a city run eficiently if commissioners come and go every 2 or 4 years? They come with no experiance, get their own agenda passed and are gone again. Then they select a Mayor with this system, you take it, no get Mikey to do it, he has more free time, or Cromie, he's a glory hound. I don't care as long as it's not me. OK, we'll give it back to Mikey. Then it's a done deal? Yep! That will get us by for another year. OK, all in favor of Mikey! Yes, congradulations, Mayor Mikey.
magnus 1 year, 1 month ago
Thank you for your accurate summary! I don't know why these people are making such a fuss. I actually think it is better that the authority & decision-making is distributed across the entire city commission instead of granting the mayor of Lawrence additional authority. The popular vote still elects the city commissioners so the current process is still influenced by the will of the (voting) people.
sad_lawrencian 1 year, 1 month ago
You should read my first comment again---I understand Lawrence has a city manager/council form of government---and I STILL think the mayor should be popularily elected. You can have a popularily-elected mayor AND keep the city manager/council government system.
blindrabbit 1 year, 1 month ago
Scrap the current process and implement a "Strong Mayor" form of city government. Enough of this city "beauty" contest crap. The City is too big to be serviced by this perpetual group of non-professional chair revolvers. Need somebody who is professionally trained and who is ultimately, directly accountable by election.
tomatogrower 1 year, 1 month ago
The commissioners are all elected at large, so they are accountable by election, and I am sick and tired of "professional" politicians. I don't want them in my city. Besides the mayor is only a figurehead. The guy who goes to social functions, and he/she pounds the gravel at meetings. They don't set the agenda.
tomatogrower 1 year, 1 month ago
So you are willing to pay a mayor to supervise the city? Right now I don't think the commission is paid anything or little of anything. If you have a problem with the city manager, so to the commission meetings and air your grievances, or send them emails. Get involved in your own city. Lots of committees that need people on them.
tomatogrower 1 year, 1 month ago
" However, I think what somebody before suggested may have some merit, with a unified county/city governing body. But I don't think the people would let that float."
Can you imagine how that state rep from around Eudora, who claimed everyone in Kansas hates Lawrence, would react? It would almost be worth promoting unified government just to watch him foam at the mouth.
blindrabbit 1 year, 1 month ago
tomato: Methinks your status quo ideas are a little overripe! Lawrence promotes the current system because it favors the special interest groups (their social set) including bankers, real estate, insurance, builders and other professionals. It is past the time when the real management in Lawrence is directly responsible to the electorate and not to some yearly personnel review by a bunch of chair swappers.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.