Previous Next
Do you think Lawrence has a panhandling problem?
Asked at Massachusetts Street on November 7, 2008
“No. There are cities with much larger homeless populations, and I think Lawrence does an admirable job helping those in need.”
“Yes. Coming from Johnson County, I think Lawrence would be a lot nicer with less panhandling. It’s hard to even go out to eat here with your family without being harassed. I think something needs to be done.”
“I do, but I’m not sure what else can be done. They already have rules on the books about it, and the people who are panhandling seem to abide by them.”
“I do not. The ones who ask me are polite enough and don’t bother me any further if I say no.”
Related story
Top ads RSS
- Floor Tech/Floater Sun.-Thurs., 2-4 hrs. per night, start at 5:00 ...
- PRODUCTION SHIRT PRESSER needed. Start at 7AM. 5 1/2 day ...
- RN, LPN and CNA/CMA positions available in family practice setting. ...
- Research Assistant KU Requires bachelor's degree in biochemistry, chemistry, molecular ...
- Cleaning Technician- 5 eves. per wk, 3 hrs per night; ...
- Blog: Song Titles And Lyrics: All About Giving Thanks November 23, 2009 · 26 comments
- No incumbents November 23, 2009 · 15 comments
- Rare Darwin book found on bathroom bookshelf November 23, 2009 · 10 comments
- Dennis Moore won't seek re-election in 2010 November 23, 2009 · 30 comments
- Blog: Stripper Blog: Saturday Night At The East Lawrence Ballet November 23, 2009 · 12 comments
- Boomer Girl Diary: Puppy's business becomes emotionally draining November 22, 2009 · 1 comment
- On the street: What is the touchiest subject between you and your in-laws? November 23, 2009 · 28 comments
- Probe timing curious November 23, 2009 · 18 comments
- Environmentalism spurs energy scare November 23, 2009 · 12 comments
- Reported rapes hit six-year high November 23, 2009 · 5 comments
- Bison tours offered at Tallgrass preserve November 23, 2009
- Shining seas November 23, 2009
- Dennis Moore won't seek re-election in 2010 November 23, 2009
- More information on high school reconfiguration sought October 27, 2009
- Probe timing curious November 23, 2009
- Lawrence native a Rhodes Scholar November 23, 2009
- Studies redefine concept of alcoholism November 23, 2009
- Pride of LHS Marching Lions: Band looks back on winning season November 22, 2009
- Would lower drinking age curb abuse? April 19, 2007
- Calendar Girl: Cheer coach master of time management November 23, 2009
7 November 2008
at 3:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tonythetiger (Anonymous) says…
Not at all. What I am concerned about the most is; Where is Waldo ( I assume Waldo street in Salem, Oregon)?Where in the world is Carmen San Diego?and…Who dated Daphne Griffinth in Junior High back in 1984?
7 November 2008
at 3:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tonythetiger (Anonymous) says…
Okay, them maybe Jill Koch from KJHK production staff could tell me what is wong then?
7 November 2008
at 4:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
No. What downtown does have a problem with is the local chamber and local government flooding the retail market = negative impact = economic pollution = less dollars for each retailer = more taxes for local residential property owners. Some day current retailers need to come to the conclusion there are only so many retail dollars available in Lawrence,Kansas. Then become very vocal and stand up for themselves. Local governments primary focus is keeping developers happy not current retailers or taxpayers.
7 November 2008
at 6:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas_opines (Anonymous) says…
Man, it's sad to see JoCo corrupt one that is so young. No, we don't. It's only a problem if you allow it to be one. There's hardly a large concentration of them, and in general they stay off on the side. And, in general, all it takes is a very simple three word combination to get by.”no, no change.”“no, got nutn”“no, sorry man”“no, go away”“no, get lost”“yes, here's some”If you eliminate the panhandlers, you likely eliminate the musicians, too. I like the musicians. (cast)
7 November 2008
at 6:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas_opines (Anonymous) says…
tony: You don't have to go all the way to Salem. There's a Waldo in KC, around 75th and Wornall area, if I recall correctly. It's a district, not a street, but isn't that Better?
7 November 2008
at 7:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
“”Yes. Coming from Johnson County, I think Lawrence would be a lot nicer with less panhandling.”Oh, I love me some comedy in the morning.Jonas - Yes, Waldo is a part of KC that surrounds the 75th and Wornall area. Stop in at Waldo Pizza for some damn good pizza (and 329 different kinds of beer), head over to Lew's to watch a game, or head over to 75th Street Brewery for a good meal.
7 November 2008
at 8:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
autie (Anonymous) says…
I will only give them change or a biscuit when they are dressed in a bee costume. Other that that, move on buster…
7 November 2008
at 8:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
woodenfleaeater (Anonymous) says…
I asked a panhandler for some change once to use the pay phone, and he said he didn't have any. And he said that while holding a small coffee can full of change. After I got rejected by them, I don't feel so bad using the “I don't have any” line.
7 November 2008
at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hawklet21 (Anonymous) says…
Personally, no. They ask for money, I say I don't have any, I walk away. I have never, not even once, been repeatedly asked for money on Mass. There are a lot of gross, creepy, weird bums downtown, but who cares? Turn the other way.
7 November 2008
at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
PapaB (Anonymous) says…
“No. There are cities with much larger homeless populations, and I think Lawrence does an admirable job helping those in need.”- Kristen Colahan-Sederstrom, clerk, LawrencePer capita, she's wrong. Just by the fact that we make it so nice for them with our thriving downtown and its nearby homeless shelter, homeless people come to Lawrence where it's easier. A few years, a friend of mine in City Hall said it was common knowledge that a town or two in western Kansas give their homeless a one-way bus ticket to Lawrence. I'm fine with the nice and polite panhandlers, but Lawrence has more than its share.
7 November 2008
at 8:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
autie (Anonymous) says…
I'm sure it depends on who you are and what you look like..I'm a pretty stout fellow and one no, go away suffices..they are like lions on the veldt and can recognize the weak ones that will give in easy.
7 November 2008
at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BABBOY (Anonymous) says…
Yes.I do not have any problem saying no.Pray Lawrence never gets a major mall. Otherwise, downtown Lawrence will be nothing but a bar district and a place to work for some Lawyers and other businesses that deal with the County and City who would not otherwise have reason to put their offices there.
7 November 2008
at 9:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
babboy (Anonymous) says: Yes.I do not have any problem saying no.Pray Lawrence never gets a major mall. Otherwise, downtown Lawrence will be nothing but a bar district and a place to work for some Lawyers and other businesses that deal with the County and City who would not otherwise have reason to put their offices there.”Marion writes:You'd better hope that exactly that happens as what you suggest is the only way that Downtown will survive as a viable economic entity.
7 November 2008
at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
S0uPnAzi (Anonymous) says…
Yes, and as wildsun pointed out, the problem grows worse the more time you spend in downtown. I too, don't have a problem saying no, but there are some very aggresive panhandlers downtown, and I think that is way out of line. I have a job that I work hard at, they need to get one too.
7 November 2008
at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
nverlost (Anonymous) says…
Lawrence = Liberal = Enabling the “unfortunate”.
7 November 2008
at 9:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bombshell (Anonymous) says…
wildsun22 - i agree with you. i have no problem with those who ask for change politely and respectfully back off when you say “no.” I am also much more inclined to give change to someone who is at least doing something - one guy will tell you a joke for change, at least the lady with marakas is shaking those marakas, and others play music for a dollar here and there. however, i do get annoyed when i feel someone is being abrasive about it - i've seen one guy on multiple occasions screaming obscenities at people who just walk by him and this is in the middle of the day on mass street with lots of children around. also, i haven't seen them for over a year, but there was a young couple who always seemed to be posted up right out front of zen zero and asked me for my leftovers on more than one occasion - i gave it to them the first time, but after that i had to say no because at the time, as a college kid and paying my way through school, i didn't have a lot of extra money either and a leftover dinner was a means of stretching my limited funds as much as possible…. and a zen zero dinner can substitute as three meals if you get that heaping portion of drunken noodles- making it three $3 meals.on the other hand, working downtown at a coffee shop, i've made friends with some of the nicest homeless people i've ever met. some of whom have never once asked me for one penny, but will gladly accept a bowl of soup if you offer it to them. as far as i am concerned, these people in particular can stay in lawrence as long as they want because they are peaceful and uplifting.
7 November 2008
at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Topside (Anonymous) says…
Right on papaB. I would hate to see per capita statistics. For no bigger than Lawrence is its rediculous. Lawrence creates a great environment for the homeless/panhandlers though.
7 November 2008
at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
“You'd better hope that exactly that happens as what you suggest is the only way that Downtown will survive as a viable economic entity.”Speaking from experience?
7 November 2008
at 9:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
“Why am I paying this mortgage again?” DuDon't worry. Obama is Prez. You won't have to pay mortgage anymore.
7 November 2008
at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
conservativepunker (Anonymous) says…
Yes. Damn gutterpunks.
7 November 2008
at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sgtwolverine (Anonymous) says…
No. Lawrence could quit anytime it wants.
7 November 2008
at 9:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
snap_pop_no_crackle (Anonymous) says…
“”You'd better hope that exactly that happens as what you suggest is the only way that Downtown will survive as a viable economic entity.”Speaking from experience?”Good one, TOB.
7 November 2008
at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Easy_Does_It (Anonymous) says…
I don't think so, I've had pretty good luck here. It could be better if the college kids would not use all of their money to get drunk, although who am I to judge. I not sure the music play is the way to go, probably too many people in a confusing market.I do pretty well in Lawrence, no problems for me.
7 November 2008
at 10:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
northsider (Anonymous) says…
jonas opines, yes, losing “the maracas girl” would shatter Lawrence's music culture. Have you heard her play “flight of the bumbblebee”? You would think with so much extra time, they could actually get better. There are so many good musicians downtown that have homes and talent, it's too bad we can't listen to them uninterupted.
7 November 2008
at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
d_prowess (Anonymous) says…
I think everyone agrees that the musician/performers are totally seperate from the panhandlers and hopefully if the city does do something they recognize that. I have always seen the street performers as working individuals. They are actually doing something in hopes that it creates a financial gain for them; it just happens that their workplace is outside on the street.
7 November 2008
at 10:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunflower_sue (Anonymous) says…
I don't think the maracas girl is all that needy. Every time I see her, she looks as though she has been outfitted by Patagonia. All expensive “shabby chic.” Is panhandling a problem? Well, there is definitely way more than when I moved here umpteen years ago. During the day, it's not a big deal. In the evening, it's annoying to have the drunks hit on me or my 14 year old. (Although, oddly, it never seems to be a problem when the hubby is along.)
7 November 2008
at 10:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas_opines (Anonymous) says…
Goodness, northsider. Hostile, much?Now, if you could tell us your plan for leaving the good musicians free to perform, such as the sax guy and some of the guitar folks, and getting rid of the maracas girl (who I have not heard yet) and the others who are, contrasting your words, talentless and homeless, then I'd be interested in hearing it. Are you proposing that we ask for an address and brief demonstration prior to allowing them downtown?
7 November 2008
at 11:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
northsider (Anonymous) says…
Demo tape perhaps. Ha! You're right, I am confusing my homelessness arguement with my panhandling arguement. I like the working people, homeless or not.
7 November 2008
at 11:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
autie (Anonymous) says…
can we panhandle here? I'm hungry and need biscuit money..please send your spare change to autie in care of the LJW…
7 November 2008
at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jumpin_catfish (Anonymous) says…
Of course there is and we all know it even if we don't want to acknowledge it. Money for nothing and get your drugs for free.
7 November 2008
at 12:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
woodenfleaeater (Anonymous) says…
The only change I have expericene with is from Tuesday night….da da tss
7 November 2008
at 12:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
“Damn gutterpunks”Didn't I see the Damn Gutterpunks open for the Meat Puppets once? I don't have a problem ignoring people asking me for money when I walk the street. What I do have a problem with are all the smokers standing outside blowing smoke in the faces of those who pass by. Take it inside already, damn patio-area punks.
7 November 2008
at 12:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sustainabilitysister (Anonymous) says…
No there is not a problem of panhandling. People are poor and live in our town. People are also not tolerant to others and don't want to see poor people trying to survive. This seems to be a “nuisance” to some but it's a representation of the economy and the lack of distribution of wealth. We can't make them go hide in the woods, they're being evicted from those places. We need to work towards taking care of ALL people, not just some.
7 November 2008
at 12:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
And yes, I know there is a ban. I was just having a laugh.
7 November 2008
at 12:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Bone777 (Anonymous) says…
I remember when the closest thing to panhandlers were the local drunks that just seem to eat out of the trash and cuss passerbys. In paticular, two brothers that had big reddish brown hair that rode bikes all of the time… Now Lawrence is starting to look like a talentless Boulder, Co.
7 November 2008
at 12:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Bea -A Meat Puppets reference? You constantly amaze me.
7 November 2008
at 12:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
consumer1 (Anonymous) says…
Copy a five dolllar bill ––-only on one side, then fold it, so it looks like a real five. On the other side print, get a job ya bum!!!!This is fun!!
7 November 2008
at 1:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
prospector (Anonymous) says…
I don't see any pans with handles out there, but I usually limit my exposure to the 600 block of Mass St. I might just have to travel down there to find out if there is a problem and have myself some Free State beer while cogitating on my discoveries.
7 November 2008
at 1:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
IrishCat (Anonymous) says…
Call me a party pooper, but I'm a single mom raising two kids on my own..I currently have TWO jobs, why can't they get up off the street and get ONE? I also grew up in an area of California where they allowed pandering on the streets…it just became more and more easy for people not to have to work and hang out on the street corner, in front of businesses, and in the center median of busy traffic areas. One guy in particular passed himself off as a wounded Vet that couldn't walk…I had seen him in front of this store in a wheelchair for years and usually gave him something when I passed him…then one day I was at the bank and saw him WALK in, yes WALK in, with a roll of bills in his hand that would make a bank robber jealous..I said so….looks like your legs are working pretty well today huh? His eyes got real big and he turned around and left, wad of bills still in his hand. I say that downtown has to keep an eye on the numbers or it will eventually increase so much that the merchants downtown will suffer from a lack of customers because of it…I'm just sayin….
7 November 2008
at 1:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Dejacrew423 (Anonymous) says…
I guess I'm not downtown enough to notice. Wasn't there some festival for street performers that I missed? Well have classes at the shelter that teach fire eating and card tricks and then they could earn their money. That crazy fire eating bum would become a loved member of the community. You gotta work for my dollar!
7 November 2008
at 2:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hoss99 (Anonymous) says…
Yes i think there is a problem, i live a few block off mass, several times a week i have drunken bums knocking on my door to beg or occasionaly passing out in my yard. And how many times is the same guy going to be at a different store telling you he ran out of gas and needs a few bucks. i won't give them change but i have offered a few of them a job mowing my yard or raking leaves for they can earn some money and so far not one taker.
7 November 2008
at 3:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beatrice (Anonymous) says…
It appears that preventing panhandling is the problem, but panhandling itself seems to be going gangbusters.TOB, I was afraid that the Meat Puppets might have been too obvious. Maybe I should have gone with the Bad Livers for greater believabilty, because Damn Gutterpunks is a pretty good name.
7 November 2008
at 3:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
almost_one_percent (Anonymous) says…
issue permits for old galoots
7 November 2008
at 5:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Escapee (Anonymous) says…
Yes, Lawrence has a panhandling problem.Serious.
7 November 2008
at 6:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Crossfire (Anonymous) says…
No it is no problem at all….whenever I need a little extra money i just put on my hobo clothes and go down town and mooch.
7 November 2008
at 6:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Escapee (Anonymous) says…
Not far from the truth….
7 November 2008
at 7:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Multidisciplinary (Anonymous) says…
Have you heard her play “flight of the bumbblebee”? –—(musician rolling with laughter here)
7 November 2008
at 8:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Defender (Anonymous) says…
“Don't worry. Obama is Prez. You won't have to pay mortgage anymore.”Man, I just HATE a liar. Your ignorant political BS is not based in reality whatsoever.
7 November 2008
at 9:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas (Anonymous) says…
and your sarcasm detector needs its batteries replaced. Or recharged, if you're going green.
7 November 2008
at 9:34 p.m.
Permalink
lance1jhawk (Anonymous) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
8 November 2008
at 1:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Defender (Anonymous) says…
“Yes, Lawrence does and always will have a homeless problem. They should be rounded up and and destroyed, much like stray dogs and cats.”Troll alert, lets all make sure this one goes bye bye real quick like.
8 November 2008
at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rantor (Anonymous) says…
They should either be providing a service/talent or not be allowed. Then they should also be taxed. If they can't meet those requirements we put them to death.