Previous   Next

Should Kobe Bryant’s accuser have to testify about her sexual history in court?

Asked at Massachusetts Street on March 25, 2004

Browse the archives

“No, absolutely not. I don’t think that it’s relevant to whether or not he committed the crime he’s accused of. Nor do I think his past is relevant.”

“No, that shouldn’t matter. What she did in the past is in the past.”

“Yeah, because she could just be doing this all the time and they wouldn’t know unless they asked her.”

“No, because the case is really about what Kobe did, not what she did. That’s nobody’s business. She’s not on trial, Kobe is.”


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.