The following editorial appeared in the Providence Journal on Tuesday
Once again, the Republican-led Congress is trying to use the crude sledgehammer of federal law to save America's children from peering at pornography on the Internet. It hasn't worked in the past, and it won't work now. For better or worse, what children need are adults who supervise their activities; no magical computer filter will do the trick.
The Children's Internet Protection Act, appended to a spending bill last December, is set to go into effect next month. It would require public schools and libraries receiving federal aid for technology to install computer filters that, in theory, might block access to pornography sites.
What such filters often do, in practice, is ignore some of the ugliest and most dehumanizing pornography on the Web, while blocking access to medical information, and even to great works of literature. For example, the word "sex" on a page is enough to block out access, though the word is often used (by William Shakespeare, among others) to mean gender, not sexual activity. Filters also tend to prevent adults, not just children, from gaining access to information on the Web.
That is why the American Library Assn. has firmly, and properly, joined suit with the American Civil Liberties Union to block the new law. Their argument is that the law is unconstitutional that Congress may not make federal funds dependent on the suppression of speech.
It would be nice to wave a magic wand to protect children from the hideous world on display on the Internet. Children need to be protected by adults until they are old enough to understand. But there is no such magic that can be performed from Washington. Librarians and school officials must set the policies that work in their settings; and, until computer filtering is far more discriminating, adults need to supervise, to some degree, children's access to the Internet.
No comments
Commenting is turned off for this story.