Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, December 12, 2000

Court rejects voucher program

December 12, 2000

Advertisement

— Setting the stage for a possible Supreme Court ruling on church and state, a federal appeals court Monday declared Cleveland's school-voucher program unconstitutional because it uses tax money to send students to religious schools.

In a 2-1 ruling, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the program appears designed to favor religious schools and thereby violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

Michael Davis Jr., left, and Tyler Butler hang out in their
fourth-grade classroom as they wait for Butler's mother. Davis and
Butler are two voucher students at St. Adalbert School in
Cleveland. A federal appeals court Monday declared Cleveland's
school-voucher program unconstitutional because it uses tax money
to send students to religious schools.

Michael Davis Jr., left, and Tyler Butler hang out in their fourth-grade classroom as they wait for Butler's mother. Davis and Butler are two voucher students at St. Adalbert School in Cleveland. A federal appeals court Monday declared Cleveland's school-voucher program unconstitutional because it uses tax money to send students to religious schools.

"To approve this program would approve the actual diversion of government aid to religious institutions in endorsement of religious education, something 'in tension' with the precedents of the Supreme Court," the panel said.

Both sides predicted the dispute will go to the high court, which has passed up opportunities to consider challenges to the constitutionality of providing public aid to families whose children attend religious or other private schools.

The high court last year let stand a voucher program that includes religious schools in Milwaukee, and did not take up a challenge to a 1999 federal appeals court ruling allowing Maine to exclude religious schools from a state program subsidizing children attending private schools.

Clint Bolick of the Institute for Justice, a Washington organization that argued in support of the voucher program, said the Supreme Court should hear the case soon to protect the Cleveland participants.

"This is the test case that everyone's been waiting for," he said. "I can't imagine that the Supreme Court would allow 4,000 kids to be just yanked out of the only good schools they've ever attended."

Atty. Gen. Betty Montgomery said no immediate decision has been made on an appeal. She said the Ohio Supreme Court has upheld the state's argument that parents have a choice in how to use the vouchers and therefore there is no "constitutional entanglement."

The ruling did not halt the program.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.