March 8, 2014 |
37° Partly Cloudy with Haze
See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
I'm so glad our commissioners are doing important things, such as banning couches on porches. Now the real war against the existence of porches can begin. Those wooden things can catch on fire too!
There already is an ordinance about indoor furniture outside a residence. Is there not enough language in that one to enforce? Maybe that should have been modified instead of adding more. Make codes that can be enforced or don't make them in the first place.
Where will my chickens sleep? On the bright side, when the homeland security drones start hovering above our streets, they won't be seeing me or my chickens hanging outside on our couch.
Now if only there was an ordinance for....hmmmm. How about bicyclists must use the bike path instead of the street if there's one along a major street...nah, that's a state legislature issue. I'll come up with something...severed foot kept in a jar still legal for the porch? Yes.
My next porch couch will be eco friendly. It'll be made out of sticks and have dried leaves for cushioning.
I see a demand for lawn couches in the future!
I wonder how many house fires are ignited by a smoker in bed?
Tons of lawn furniture has upholstered cushions. Wicker is acceptable both indoor and outdoor.
Seems to me upholstered couches could be as dangerous in the living room more than outdoors if a house was burning. The temperature of a house fire will burn and/or melt most items.
This is all about "appearances". A sofa on a porch cannot impact property values such that neglected rental properties accomplish. Then again owners of these properties are city commissioners,former city commissioners,planning g commissioners,members of the chamber and employees within local government not to mention big time local movers and shakers.
as the article points out, the residence should have smoke alarms inside which would detect a fire but porches tend to not have smoke alarms which means the fires can get out of control before being detected.
Seriously, the landlord??? I doubt they had a thing to do with it and don't like it either. THE tenants did it, fine them!!!!
To be fair, any landlord worth their salt will turn around and put either an eviction or responsibility clause in their lease. Something to the effect of "If the city fines me for a couch on the porch while you're on the lease, you owe me twice that. If it happens a second time within 18 months, you're evicted for non-compliance with city ordinances"
Ten fires out of 463... or 2.16 % of fires are caused by upholstered furniture on porches. What about upholstered furniture indoors? What about the almost 98% of other type of fires? What will the City do next to protect us from ourselves? Now, it's the landlords problem? Property owners beware !! Big Brother is watching.
Wasn't there an arsonist setting fires last year? I'm reasonably sure they included those fires in that total as well...
Tenants are clearly the ones breaking the law here if they put couches on the porch, and so they should pay the fine.
It's not reasonable to hold landlords responsible for that misbehavior.
All the landlord has to do is put wording in the lease stating that putting a couch on the porch is prohibited and that the tenant will be responsible for any incurred fines.
Maybe so, if they can actually collect from the tenants.
But, even without such a provision in leases, I think tenants should have to pay - they're the ones breaking the law, not the landlords.
Once again it's wording in the lease. All they have to do is state that the fine will be added to their next month's rent and it must be paid in full. Pretty simple.
Maybe. But it leaves the burden to landlords.
Since tenants are breaking the law, I think the city should enforce it against them, rather than making the landlord do it.
If/when tenants don't comply, it takes time for eviction, and landlords have to suffer those costs for quite a while (somewhere around 3 months), and then sue the tenants for it later on, all of which are serious hassles for them to deal with. And, they've done nothing wrong.
Once again I am so glad I do not live in the dictatorship of Lawrence. I have always been fond of Bob Schumm, still am, but I cannot understand his vote on this. As for Amyx, he really surprised me by his vote. I never thought he had that much common sense. Just shows one is never too old to learn. There are many other serious causes of fire, shown by the Fire Department's own statistics, than an old couch on a front porch. I remain seriously concerned about the government telling us how to live our lives. This includes federal, state, county, and city governments. I suppose they think this justifies their existence, by making such silly rules and regulations. Absolutely incredible.
Did they give the landlord the power to remove the couch without being sued for taking their property? Does the landlord have to publish something in the paper saying they are going to remove it like they do before they can dispose of a tenants abandoned property?
But, they can evict the tenant for breaking the lease, if they put a provision in those prohibiting porch couches.
a typical eviction in Lawrence, Kansas takes on average 90 days minimum. That means $9,000 in assessed fines to the landlord @$100/day.
Did you see my above post, where I state unequivocally that tenants should pay these fines?
since this is CLEARLY a fire safety issue and CERTAINLY not a disguised pretentious aesthetics issue, I'm sure the commission will be fine with me replacing my porch couch with several old toilets I can use as lounging chairs. After all, porcelain is not easily flammable! It's really safe!
no mention in the article about the vote as in who voted yes and who voted no. why not?
Approved on a 3-2 vote, with Amyx and Farmer voting no.
It's right there in the article.
excuse the ineffective speed read, jafs. I see it now. thanks
gonna take these away ? Huh ?
Does expensive and new count ? Or just used and poor ? Huh ?
The distinction in the law is between "indoor" and "outdoor" furniture.
And the photo above could be either. Who decides?
The city decides, I would imagine.
If it were a reasonable distinction, there would be some sorts of differences between how the furniture was constructed, so that outdoor furniture is more suitable for outdoor use.
the picture is not upholstered furniture, is has removable cushions leaving a "stand" that is not made of material
As I said, the distinction is between "indoor" and "outdoor" furniture.
At the meeting, the fire chief said outdoor furniture has a tag on it that says it is rated for outdoor use. Thanks, Chad.
Then, there shouldn't have been a problem with enforcing the existing ordinance, except for the question of whether a porch is outside, which seems self evident to me.
Unless, of course, it's an "enclosed porch" - how will those be treated with the new ordinance, if you know?
I have a screened in porch that is considered livable square footage. I also have what they call "outdoor" furniture, but the cushions on it are just as flammable as any couch would be. The distinction of outdoor furniture is usually that it can hold up to weather (rain, snow, etc...), but they're all flammable.
This law is just stupid.
I was under the impression that having couches on the porch was already against the law. I thought it was against fire codes to have a couch on the porch.
When I was in school our rental house had a couch on the porch. In a matter of months it turned into a mildew-covered mouse nest. I think the rodent issue is just as much of a concern as the fire issue. I found out the hard way that couches on porches are not a good idea.
I had a recliner, a high quality one, but it was older, that I placed on the front porch. Within two months the mold and mildew smell was so terrible I had to put it out with the trash.
Mike Amyx and Jeremy Farmer will be getting my vote next election. Not the others, I'll vote for anyone else.
Ridiculous waste of our money, when so many other things are more important.
If I ever run for city council, I would have voted no as well. But I'm libertarian, and "laws" like this are already on the books, so why create more?
It's the Payless Furniture and Bed Mart sign wavers at 23rd & Iowa's fault. Ban them.
Did they have to get a permit for the sign wavers? Payless even has one at 23rd & Louisiana. Just wondering. Much more of a distraction than car lot signs, balloons, etc.
They even had one at Sixth and Michigan last week. It's getting a little out of hand.
Trash is trash. And upholstered furniture outside is trash. If it takes "big government" to get someone to empty their trash, I am all for "big government."
Thanks Dever, Schumm, and Riordan.
Dr. Riordan did not like the view from his castle.
Good move by the city, sometimes you just have to force the hillbilly out of people.
No, they are forcing the hippie out of people. Hillbillies use rocking chairs.
I say this concern got feet because some folks think the couch on the porch is tacky.
If anyone believes land lords will be held accountable for the fines then guess what I've got lake front property for sale in a very unusual location.
I've always been under the impression that a patio is outside in the open and on a hard surface such as river gravel, concrete,pavers etc etc etc ...... nothing like a front porch. A matter of semantics perhaps.
A decision based on less than 2 fires a year?
Bring on the rockin chairs and Jayhawk basketball outside.
City Commissioner Bob Schumm said. “I’m not trying to tell people how to live or how to socialize. It is kind of like the old pop bottle rockets. I loved shooting them off as a kid, but they just cause too many fires.”
Yea, upholstered furniture is widely known for causing fires...
How is it, exactly, that outdoor upholstered furniture is a fire hazard but indoor upholstered furniture is not?
You have smoke detectors inside. If a couch goes up on the porch, by the time the residents figure it out all of their escape routes may be compromised.
This couch on the porch made the Kansas City Star. Questioning our city commissioners sanity may well be on trial.
Over and above the couch on the porch taxpayers one day will need to make a rather smart decision.
How many more tax dollar abatements do the taxpayers want to see given away as a matter of everyday routine business. It is my position that every city commission meeting with damn few exceptions increase the cost of living to residents in Lawrence,Kansas.
Increase the cost of living by way of increasing property values, user fees, property taxes,sales taxes or whatever to cover the cost of those not paying their fair share. Yes annually we get nickel dimed so often it is hard to recall how many over the past decade have taken place. Which adds to to enough money that could be better spent at a local retail operation.
Nobody has yet explained why we need this new ordinance, when the existing one already prohibits indoor furniture outside.
Why not just enforce the existing ordinance? And, if we're not, then why is there any reason to believe we'll enforce the new one any better?
Because some people don't think of a porch as being "outside".
City officials last night said they weren't confident they could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the previous ordinance on the books could be applied to upholstered furniture on porches. It left open an argument about whether a whether a porch was an exterior part of the home, and it also left open to debate what was outdoor furniture. The new ordinance is more specific on both counts. Thanks, Chad
So if I move the couch into my yard to sit on it, we're cool then, right?
Move your couch to the yard and your beer pong table to the porch.
49 LJworld comments, 48 of which are critical of their vote. Awesome. Good job representing your constituents, city commission.
A rather small sample, to be sure.
Population of Lawrence is about 90,000.
Maybe..but I'm gettin old....It would make me wanna "go" all the time....just seeing the thing....gotta go.....
The Lawrence visitor center needs to start handing out brochures explaining all the random rules and regulations our commissioners have come up with to help save us from ourselves. Or maybe we should have them posted alongside the downtown charity meters, no wait, that would be a fire hazard.
The City hasn't decided when to begin enforcing the ban. Instead, they will do educational effort, especially in student neighborhoods, to gain "voluntary compliance". Now where have I heard that one before? Perhaps in WWII?
Hey here is what I suggest to impress the Commissioners: Everyone in Lawrence who has a front porch, carry that living room sofa out and spend the evening sitting on it. Talk to the people who walk in front of your house with friends or pets. You would get to know all your neighbors that way. You might enjoy the experience. Wouldn't it be fun if all the front porch home owners planned a "sit out" day?
That sounds like a great idea.
I do remember reading about how Hitler forced all the people to take couches of their porches
GODWIN ALERT GODWIN ALERT GODWIN ALERT GODWIN ALERT
Next they will want to ban fireworks....
So then porch fires because of couches occur at a significantly lower rate than suspicious Compton property fires? I guess students just
don't give enough bribes.
The word on the street is that they'll be excepting couches at the corner of 9th and New Hampshire this weekend. Just drop your couch in the hole and they'll have their arson expert on hand to help get rid of them.
If you have an indoor sofa on your front porch, put it out in the street so the city will pick it up for you.
Anyone remember the fires on Tennessee Street last year that all but gutted a couple of houses? I seem to remember reading that those fires started on a porch with indoor furniture setting outside. Had those fires not been facing Tennessee Street, but instead the alley, what do you think the likelihood of it being confined to one house would be?
You are willing to ban the police department from ever using drones, but a couch is somehow sacrosanct?
cocking my head to the side like a dog listening but not understanding
Exactly! I recall a fire on Indiana a few years back caused by someone throwing fireworks on the couch on the front porch late at night where they smoldered for awhile. Some of the occupants were jumping out of the windows to escape the flames a short time later, one of them seriously injured. While the percentage may be low, the resulting damage collectively is hundreds of thousands of dollars. Not worth it when loss of life is at risk.
The couch wasn't the problem, the illegal fireworks were. That was Darwinism at it's best. Let nature take its course.
And their neighbors?
Careful, then they will cite your for having "pot" on your porch...
I find it funny that the couch issue (which is ridiculous) is getting all the attention and yet another tax abatement isn't.
What abatement? I haven't heard anything about one recently.
When couches are outlawed only outlaws will have couches.
I had quite a double take when I saw the couch used to illustrate this article a couple days ago. And now, it's there again. That was my old hide-a-bed couch! I recognized the couch, the dumpster, and the car in the background. I paid $40 to have it hauled out to the trash, and in its 50 or so years of use, it was never on a porch.
Talk about off topic,,,
<#*&("":! Government at work. I hope everyone votes against the commissioners who voted for this. I hope everyone moves their couches to the front lawn, near the porch and continues to enjoy the atmosphere.
What could be next? No front porch...... let your mind consider the possibilities.
Maybe we will have a new city ordinance requiring all newly constructed homes to be built of concrete. As I am sure you are aware, concrete is fireproof.
To hell with the utility bills, because concrete (and stone) homes cost a fortune to heat.
If you insulate the outside of a stone structure, you heat it once and it stays warm. Yeah, that first heating will take awhile and be expensive, but then it will be much cheaper to sustain the temperature through the season.
I have a story for you, and it's a fact. I could even locate the house, or what is left of it, for you if you want. There seemed to be nothing unusual about the house, but I don't really remember it very well, since I was only inside it once that I can recall, and I was very young at the time.
It was a farmhouse, and the family that lived there moved to town, and left the house vacant. Some years later it burned down. Or part of it did, anyway.
After the fire, it was revealed that contained within the wooden house was a smaller stone house that no one knew was there!
I don't have a strong opinion on this either way. On one hand, people should be able to have a porch couch--they are very popular for students. On the other hand, I saw the outcome when one caught fire due to the tenant absent-mindedly dropping a cigarette (after all, he was outdoors). Sadly the whole front of the house went up in flames and had to be replaced by the owner. Too bad that several stupid people who smoke and weren't careful, have caused porch couches to be banned by everyone, but that's the way it goes. Porch couch fires are more common that I realized. Time for them to just get some proper outdoor furniture or use plastic chairs.
I am shocked, appalled and disgusted that it even occurs to the Commission that it might have authority over my porch furniture. And spare me the safety arguments. Is my freedom to have a porch couch worth the fires that might occur if they are not banned? Yes, absolutely, just as the consequences, deaths even, would be worth it if we shut down the police state we've become and began defending our freedom instead of thanking our oppressors for "protecting" us by assuming an absolute right over our persons and property when it suits their purposes. Does that sound extreme? Do you miss habeas corpus? Do you even know that it's gone? Do you think the President of the United States should have the power to assassinate a citizen of the United States? You know that's already happened, don't you?
You claimed that having a couch on your front porch is worth the consequence of deaths, and that would be fine, because the deaths would be worth it. Then later in the paragraph, you also claimed that the President has assassinated a citizen of the United States as though that was a terrible thing.
Make up your mind. Is death a bad thing or not?
I am just shocked...shocked, I tell you, to learn that the City has electrical and construction codes. they regulate how and when I put my trash out. They even tell me I can not put my pick-up on cinder blocks in my front yard. We need to shut down this police state, even it takes deaths for us to gain our liberty.
They make you mow your lawn too. Did you know that?
This is a perfect time to use our new armored vehicle!!! Couch enforcement!
This is totally ridiculous! Is there a limit on how many ordinances there can be?
An ordinance against upholstered furniture outdoors has existed for a long time. All the commission did was clarify and emphasize with a separate ordinance. If the commission had not passed the new ordinance, couches would still not be allowed outdoors because of existing ordinances. It's just a matter of enforcement. Why the debate?
So can I still sit on my front porch toilet???
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·