See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
Thanks for your letter. You raise many good points about the real needs in Lawrence.
Great letter Mr. Reynolds. I couldn't agree more.
Thanks for thinking about the bigger issues. I feel this town make decision based in the issue on front of them and they don't step back and see what is causing the problem.
You hit it on the head. What a concept... Add business to Lawrence the city gains jobs, we give jobs to the ones who need them, people stay here and shop here, grow our tax base to pay for all the things Lawrecians want ( libraries, rec center, depots) I don't see the down side.
Thanks Mr. Reynolds for having a larger vision!!
As long as we don't get blinded by the "jobs" idea without looking at the type of jobs. Your kids would still qualify for food assistance if you worked for typical Menards wages. There's no point in giving a business tax cuts on the front end and still needing to subsidize the wages of the workers with food assistance on the back end. The only winner in that scenario is the business owner.
Wow. Now we're up to tax cuts on the front end?
The only jobs that will add to Lawrence's economic future are not part time wait staff and part time gaming table staff. We treat people like cattle and wonder why we have problems. It is not just about outside money coming which a casino will produce for the Delaware, not Lawrence, but about jobs that pay enough that people can afford to live here. The majority of prole going to casinos go home to sleep and eat in the casino. They don't shop downtown. This is win, but not for Lawrence and if on trust lands no taxes for the state or local economy. Not like you think. Yes lawrence has done a poor job bringing business to town, but jobs that don't bring people to live here do not support the local economy.
$50 million? Where'd that number come from?
From the LJWorld article.
That was for the failed casino proposal:
"Back then, before the multimillion-dollar Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway was built in Wyandotte County, the tribe was exploring a casino with a 400-room hotel, convention center and museum. Dee Ketchum, a Kansas University basketball player in the 1950s, was chief of the Delaware tribe at the time and estimated the complex would add about $50 million a year to the Lawrence economy. "
Reynolds' letter referenced $50 million now: "The project IS estimated to bring $50 million a year to Lawrence’s economy," Does he know something we don't know?
"... yet we have children needing food in Lawrence!"
---Dave, it would be instructive for you to observe the recent filing of Detroit's bankruptcy. note that lawrence is a little drop of blue in a huge sea of red, so to speak. other parts of kansas seem to have better employment. hmmm. suppose it's who's in charge?
It would be instructive to know a little context on Detroit - the emergency manager who is declaring bankruptcy was not democratically elected but, in fact, appointed by the Republican governor -- using highly unpopular legislation snuck into an appropriations bill to avoid a SECOND voter referendum. This "fiscal conservative" is also allowing $285 million in public funds to be used to build a new stadium at the same time as the Chapter 9 filing.
Kochmoney, the comments about Detroit are entirely not relevant to the points Mr. Reynolds is making about the situation here in Lawrence.
The issues in Lawrence are about a significant lack of leadership, forward planning, problem solving and a very myopic view of what Lawrence should be.
Detroits issues go back to the turn of the last century. Lawrence's go back to the mentality that killed the so called "Corn Field Mall" and the ever restrictive codification of a "Utopian" Lawrence.
Lawrence can "Have It All". It just needs to realize "My Way or Highway" doesn't work. In stead cooperation, problem solving and a willingness to have a win-win result achieves benefits for all.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·