April 19, 2014 |
See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
Apparently this writer knows what he and every other journalist will have to say to keep their jobs from now on if people like the Kochs get control of our media.
No wonder these creepy Koch brothers want less regulation.http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2012/10/14/billionaire-william-koch-accused-of-kidnapping-and-imprisoning-executive-on-colorado-ranch/
Koch will "legitimize" these papers the same way Rupert Murdoch "legitimized" FOX.
Yeah. Rigghhht. (No pun intended.)
Fair and balanced ideology? What’s that? Libertarians want the benefits of civilization without the responsibilities. Rightwing republicans want the benefits of civilization and don’t want to pay for them. Moderate republicans and democrats want the benefits of civilization at the lowest cost. Left wing liberals want the benefits of civilization at any cost.
Me? I’m right wing on gun control (you can have my guns after I‘m out of ammo and too exhausted to swing my sword anymore), left wing on abortion and gay marriage (everyone has the right to go to hell in their own way), libertarian in my views of personal freedom (adult seatbelt laws is government overreach at its worst) and in general with the moderate democrats and republicans
For a minute I thought the headline was from the Onion. Alas, no. Half of me is laughing my head off, the other thinking I'd better take some more shooting classes to protect myself from these radicals. Cal and his ilk are scary. They want little robots who only think and act like they do.
Well, I worked on the school newspapers in high school and college and I was taught that first you find out about a story and then you ascertain the facts and that is what you write. You never, ever insert yourself or your beliefs into a story. This is not creative writing class. Just tell the people who, what, where, why.
I feel a little bitter when I read stories today. Since, I was in school when Kennedy was elected, and assassinated, and the Vietnam and Civil Rights Era, I could have written some humdingers. Still, when I think about it, just giving the verifiable facts about those events was enough.
I am very worried about the Koch's wanting own newspapers and the comments on here have been excellent. The only thing that any of us can actually do about any of this is to keep our own freedom of speech alive and well.
He said "ideologically balanced coverage."
I would question if, by definition, ideology can be balanced.
And therein lies Mr. Thomas' problem. Well, one of them.
Actually, MacLeod , 2011Urban politics reconsidered. For a start. Clark discusses urban political regimes.
History has shown the media tends to legitimize the elitist faction. (Clark. 2001) urban politics. This, unfortunately, would be nothing new.
"Without a strong journalistic watchdog, government runs amok. " It has been a long time since we've had journalism in the msm and the labels conservative, liberal, Republican, Democrat don't matter. They are all on the same side and these other diversions are just false dichotomies. Mussolini said the essence of fascism is corporate takeover of government. While the USA has a long history of leaning in that direction, it has now become completely, unabashedly fascist. The msm has certainly contributed to this. They are losing credibility every day as people come out of their hypnosis.
Cal is funny when he starts off with the phrase "mainstream media."
The presence of these "conservative" brothers in American media needs some vvery careful attention.
Hitler did not take over Germany. The people gave it to him. They bought the Nazi (extreme right wing) drivel and the rest is hostory. (read "harsh right wing positions")
These political positions exist in America under the laughable lable "conservative"
They deserve very close scruitiny.
"Those who do not remember the lossons of history are doomed to repeat them."
Hard to associate "strong and healthy journalism" with Koch brothers' propaganda. They are a destructive force in this country. Why is it never enough for "one percenters" like them. They already are billionaires several times over, own countless profitable companies, yet they always want more. With the Koch brothers and their ilk, more is never enough. Just plain good old American greed.
Not one ounce of integrity left in the writer of this column.
I don't know where all these simpletons come from who made Fox the number one rated news on cable. Probably at work, church or defending our country.
I think that if you are unaware of the practices of the Koch brothers (or just protective of their practices) than you might be naive enough to make the "assumption" that Bozos or Merrils comments are unwarranted. However, if you have any knowledge of the practices of the Koch brothers, then speculation of how their purchase may affect these newspapers is quite warranted.
I wouldn't imply that you take a position with the Kochs/Faux News, only that you might be very qualified too.
Between Merrill and Bozo, they have a combine 50,000 posts in this forum, yet complain that the Koch brothers are in danger of getter too much free speech. Now there is irony for you.
Bozo, it seems the current prez is batting 3/3. Exxon and Chevron are in the top 3 richest companies so I don't see the current admin doing any harm to oil barrons now.
As long as comedy central is still going, the left will have their news network.
It's laughable, and points to Cal's sloppy and unethical thinking, that he'd lead his piece with an overgeneral reference to the “Mainstream media" being "alarmed." The headline for this piece could accurately read "Long-time member of media elite decries media elite's take on Koch Bros. newspaper plans."
Because his columns are so widely syndicated, Cal is a poster boy for the so-called "mainstream media." Either he's too thick to see that, or he knows it and plays his audience for fools anyway.
He's also a poster boy for what's wrong with civic conversation in the U.S.
The Journal-World does the local community a disservice by printing his pieces. Not because of what he writes per se, but because he engages in the worst kind of unexamined bias and sloppy thinking imaginable. If he were able to argue ethically, his opinions might be worthwhile. As it stands, he's simply a good example for younger Americans on what to avoid in terms of thinking and communicating.
The Kochs won't be buying these newspapers because it's a good "business investment" in and of itself. Ad revenues from newspapers continue to go down in a trend that is almost certain to continue.
They'll be buying these newspapers merely to amplify and "legitimize" the right-wing propaganda they already fund at ALEC, AFP and numerous astroturf organizations-- you know, repeat the same lies often enough, and they become truthy.
No legitimate journalist would want to be affiliated with that sort of sham. But Cal is not a journalist.
Great idea. Sacrifice accuracy for whatever "truth" further pads the Kochs' bottom line. Promote ignorance, and abandon even the semblance of distinction between journalism and propaganda.
Looks like we're headed toward a world in which, if you're rich enough, you ARE entitled to your own facts.
Koch Outspends Exxon-Mobil on Climate Denial
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·