Dec. 21, 2014 |
See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
Spending tax dollars to build a building that does not need to built vs remaining in a building that is already home.
Where are the fiscal conservative republicans? The fiscal responsible leadership left town and the reckless spenders moved in..... the bottom line.
The KSU foundation is building the building - is that tax dollars?
Lots of people in Lawrence work there. Long commute to Manhattan.
Boy, Manhattan sure has lots going for it these days. Their economic development and all the related spin-off business is kicking our butts.
It's also soooo much more bicycle friendly for commuting.
Even the Kansas government doesn't want to live in Topeka.
How does the quote apply to this situation?
Good question. If anything it looks like it will be costing more money. They will have to train new people to fill the jobs that are lost, they will have to pay unemployment benefits to those who can't make the move, and, even if someone else is paying for the building, they aren't going to pay the moving expenses. There's just more of fixing things that aren't broke.
Wow, where to start. Yeah, let's move all government services to the geographic center not to where the majorty of the popluation is. Great move. And let's move all of the governmental agencies so that they aren't close to one another. That way the benefits of shared resouces and one stop shopping are lost. And let's not give unemployment to folks who cannot or choose not to make the move. Why, because some companies don't offer it? Geez...
Oh, it is so simple?
Expecting employees to commute an extra 2 hours a day is pretty unreasonable without any additional pay.
Leave it to Sam and his cronies...they'll ignore a state law that requires state agencies to be located in Topeka, then they'll try to spin it that more is less. Kansas is so Brownbackward!
This is a roundabout way to cut the employee head count for the KDA. "We are moving. Oh yeah, you need to move yourself."
So the state is issuing bonds to be paid off by a state agency, and at the end of the lease the K-State Foundation will own it?
This may or may not be a good move for the future, but it seems like bad timing for spending more money and making employees choose whether to move their families, with perhaps a spouse who has a job in Topeka, to Manhattan, or to make the very expensive round trip every day. Too many times people have moved for a job and then been laid off.
We know by now that there seems to be another agenda behind everything Brownback et al do. My guess would be that, at least in part, this is a way to get rid of employees who are not ideologically pure, i.e., they have functioning brain cells.
Perhaps I can now find someone to car pool with. yeah.
Ok, so no adminitrative staff is going to make the move because they get paid less than 30k.
There are other 30k jobs out there than don't require a 1 hour commutes.
Manhattan is more expensive than Topeka or Lawrence. So any employee that doesn't want to go through selling their house to get a smaller or more expensive house will be looking for a different job rather than taking a pay cut.
Anybody near retirement might stick out the drive for a little while, but the price of gas and the loss of 2 hours a day on the road will end that pretty quickly.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that this move will gut the agency and reduce the effectiveness of state government.
And for what benefit? Oh, they will be located next to NBAF. Like the Feds are going to open the doors to the state and let them look at the various experiments... Got it...
okey dokey, this looks good for Manhattan. what about the rest of us?
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·