Dec. 22, 2013 |
See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
"The savings, however, also come from expected reductions in welfare spending because of the prediction that the Kansas economy will improve, according to a memo from the Kansas Budget Division and Kansas Legislative Research Department."
In other words, the savings are imaginary, and the benefits to people with disabilities are bread and circuses from an administration that is underwater on approval ratings. That does bring up an interesting point, though. If the program really were working much better than expected, why not take advantage of the three years of full federal funding and expand it as allowed under Obamacare?
Brownback Administration serves Medicaid recipients better.
Dedicates savings to help disabled.
If you define 'serves Medicate recipients better' as delaying payments to providers, adding layers of red tape, communicating poorly, and causing delays in including providers and approving medications, then sure, it's totally served the recipients better.
Saves money - sure, if you delay payments and make it harder to get services, it's going to save money, because fewer people will be helped. I'd love to see some evidence that it actually saves money while providing better services. Really. I'd love to see evidence that it does this. It would be great news for everyone. Maybe next year? http://www.khi.org/news/2013/mar/04/safety-net-clinics-struggling-kancare/
That article says they both want to make sure that KanCare works as it's supposed to work, and that they support bills regarding oversight of KanCare by the state.
I can't imagine anybody who cares about the folks served by this program who would disagree with that.
However, as far as I know, there have been no bills passed in the legislature regarding oversight of KanCare by the state, and no evidence that the state is exercising good oversight yet. Meanwhile, there are ongoing problems with the program.
You'll notice my link was published a month later than yours.
Also serves less people as more and more people with disability fall through the holes and are no longer covered. Any program will save money, just make it nearly impossible to qualify for so less people will use it. Yes, do that for any program, it will save money. You might have the disabled out panhandling on the street, but at least the state isn't spending any money on them!
As the over-used saying goes "Show me the money"!!
Somebody review their numbers!!! This can't be right. He's taking our medicaid dollars an giving it to KU Med??? I don't think that's exactly ethical. That's our money, folks. It should be doing what its supposed to be used for and not filling in gaps in Sam's Unicorn and Faery budget plan.
Of course you're saving money. When you don't provide services or pay the providers y0u'll save all kinds of money.
Well, it's been all of about 3 1/2 months with the new program, and there are still numerous problems, including not paying providers, difficulty accessing one's insurance company for those on Medicaid, etc.
Seems to me it would be prudent to wait a bit longer before deciding it's a success, and that we're saving money while also providing quality services.
Anybody can save money by providing lower quality services, and not paying providers.
And, of course, predictions that the economy will improve aren't worth the paper they're written on.
But, I'm a bit surprised that he proposes using any savings to help more people - not sure what his real agenda is there.
His real agenda, when those savings don't materialize and he loses that school funding lawsuit, is to pit funding schools against funding services for the disabled.
if you believe his words you are buying into fraud.
He just wants his name on a building.
Yes - I'm sure that's part of it, too.
When did Brownback become a tax and spend liberal?
There's no money to spend here, all this revised estimate does is move the governor's budget closer to where the legislature's budget is.
The only way to spend this "dividend" is with a sales tax increase.
Another awesome idea from Sam to continue his string of awesome ideas for Kansas and America.
I am on Medicaid and have had no problems whatsoever seeing my doctors or getting my prescriptions filled.
I even got a debit card with twenty on it that I can use for medical related expenses. I got it because I did something good about my health. Every time I do so I get more money placed on my card. This money can only be used for medical expenses such as co-pays and such.
You can get a free phone with so many minutes on it though I have not done that yet.
My doctors do know what is covered and what is not so they do not prescribe meds that I cannot get. That might be the problem some people are having.
Well, my Kansas friends, you now have the state government you voted for. Your state is the laughingstock of the country, your Bible-thumping statewide ignorance is legendary. You are now governed by the inmates from the State Hospital. Good Luck.
I don't have the government I voted for, but I still have to live with it. At least I have a choice. The people on KanCare largely don't.
Why are there 6,000 people on the waiting list for services? Can it be because KanCare doesn't care to provide services that do not increase the bottom line? You can't privatize health care without an incentive for those companies to treat patients with limited resources.
To be fair, the waiting list existed before KanCare. The waiting list is because Kansas, like many other states, has underfunded these services for years and years. Long, silent lists. Very easy to ignore. Very hard to keep funded. They've gotten worse in recent years with budget cuts.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·