See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
It's a common theme in the LjW LTE. Not enough people......
Use the local golf courses.
Ride the T bus system
Use the Library
Implement water conservation measures
Implement energy conservation measures
Pay child support (I don't see this as a LTE topic but threw it in 'cause it's true)
Ya' know what people do....eat. Next election, put the voting booths in restaurants, you'll see an increase in voter turn out.
Schools and churches are the primary locations: maybe bad memories keep folks away from these? In all fairness, Checkers grocery store is a precinct location too....maybe get the Hy Vees and Dillons stores to step up to the plate in other parts of town???
The transportation and safe footing difficulties caused by a couple of bang-bang 10-inch snow storms can take the starch out of the most ardent voter.
I'll bet the voter turnout is much higher come the general election. Well, assuming Lawrence doesn't get buried by another deep snowfall, or clobbered by a tornado.
What do you bet close to 100% of regestered voters who own a four wheel drive vehicle, didn't vote? Ha. It's apathy, not the weather. We had until 7:00pm to vote.
You know who volunteers to tend the voting polls? LITTLE OLD LADIES!!!! THAT's RIGHT, 70+ year old women make it to the polls.
I guess this is the reality of an uneducated electorate who spend more time listening to reality TV than the reality of their own lives. Someone needs to do a better job of telling the uneducated who to vote for.
I helped one candidate with their election. This candidate did not make it into the top 6. We will never know if the weather played a part in who got out and voted for her or not. But what did make our day was Wednesday, we received an email from a resident of Babcock Place who got out in the weather and rode the T to make sure she was able to help get her voice heard. This is a woman who truly appreciates her privilege to vote in our democratic country.
If this elderly woman made such effort, everyone else could have also. Aside from advance polling being open for three weeks prior to the election, Jamie Shew, our County Clerk, and his team extended advanced voting hours; opened on Sunday; with the help of the Secretary of State had Monday extended to 7 pm. Every candidate that I was following was getting emails, texts, FB messages, calls, etc out to make sure everyone knew. And you know what else Jamie Shew did. He slept in the courthouse, in a sleeping bag, so that he could ensure being at the courthouse Tuesday morning so he could help dispatch drivers to take people to man each polling place. By 7:30 am every polling place was open. The County Clerk's office did an amazing job.
And the result 8.6%. Sad and pathetic for a town like Lawrence where it seems every resident has an opinion. Make your opinion truly be heard on April 2nd and get out and vote in the General Election. Not only do we have the important City Commission race on the ballot but the school bond issue. Let's challenge our special town to double or more the turnout from the Primary Election! And thank you Matthew for your letter!
Yes,a big thanks to Matthew and also to you Michele and a big one to Jaime Shew.
It seems like there are people such as Mr. Shew who do so much to help others and only receive indifference for their work.
This is really sad, especially since the local elections and government touch our lives far more than the national elections. And the advance voting was so easy. Sunday was a beautiful day and there were quite a few people who showed up. Jamie Shew and his crew worked hard to allow people to vote early and avoid the storm. I am sure they are even more disappointed. They do all they can to make voting easy for people. Get away from your TV and computer and go out and vote!!
After I read the first paragraph of Mr. Herberts post patting himself on the back and telling how cool it was to advance vote. I knew the next paragraph would be to express his shame for all the other voters. Sorry the voters didn't meet your expectations.
I don't believe any shame/embarassment was meant towards "voters". I think it's the non-voters that shame was directed at.
okay, I will say it. It. was. a. primary.
mom_of_three: tell that to the 5 who didn't make it. Normally there is not enough candidates running for City Commission to warrant a primary. But with 11 in the race, this primary was very important! If you have a difficult time finding three candidates you are passionate about in the General election, you might be wishing you voted in the primary.
"But with 11 in the race, this primary was very important! If you have a difficult time finding three candidates you are passionate about in the General election, you might be wishing you voted in the primary. "
You can be passionate about your candidates all you want but the fact is, even if you voted in the primary, there is no guarantee that they would win. So you still could have voted in the primary and still feel you have crappy choices for candidates in the general election.
And the number of candidates in a primary does not necessarily indicate its importance.
Don't know if it's apathy or cynicism. Intelligent folks know the political process--local as well as national--gives the wealthy an upper hand in the process. Why vote? It merely lends legitimacy to a corrupt process.
Please don't take this personally, but that response was ridiculous. Asking people to express an opinion, giving each and every person one "point" for their opinion regardless of personal wealth or prestige and declaring a winner based solely upon total votes is a corrupt process? Take off your tin foil hat and participate.
I think the comment is more about the wealthy having the upper hand simply because they can spend more. Generally, the candidates that can outspend their opponents win.
in a local election? Seriously? We're not talking millions of dollars in campaign spending here. Jeremy Farmer took second place in the primary as the director of a local food pantry. Who on this message board wants to tell me that he's wealthy?
He is backed by the wealthy. Look at his campaign contribution list.
Who said anything about millions of dollars? I said generally, the candidates that outspend their opponents win. And the candidate doesn't have to be wealthy, they just have wealthy supporters. That does allow the wealthy to have an upper hand via their candidate.
IIRC, all the ones that lost the primary spent very little (and did not raise much for funding) overall compared to the ones that won the primary.
I didn't vote in the primary but it's the first election I've missed in 25 years. The reason I sat out on this one was because I hadn't done my homework and didn't really know anything about the candidates.
I think 8.6% is actually a decent turnout for a primary. If it were a general election then that would be low. Way too long of a whine for a primary.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.