May 18, 2013 |
See complete forecast
Copy and paste the link:
We should also require passing a money manage course to graduate.
Yes and no. It would be a valuable skill for those who plan to have children/ a family BUT would be a complete waste of time and educational opportunities for those who don't.
High School and even College curriculum already require hours that have nothing to do with the students desires or interestes, why add another?
I agree, but many people who don't plan to have children have them anyway (either on purpose or by surprise).
Maybe by having a class like this it will introduce a non-future parent to have children or vice-versa. With this knowledge, the student has some FACTS to rely upon when making that decision and may scare them away from having children too soon or while in high school.
Not everything goes as planned but those who do never end up having kids may be aunts or uncles or friends of those who do have kids, so having some idea of which end of the baby goes in the diaper might be a good idea for future reference.
There are plenty of things I learned in high school that never turned out to be useful later in life. The unit on archery in gym class, for instance.
Another poorly worded poll. Is somebody new in charge of these polls at the LJW? It's unclear from the phrasing if this course would be elective or required for graduation. Assuming that a male or female student could choose to take such a course, then I'd vote "yes." And as inklines suggests, there are other "independent living skills" that are needed by our youth.
I took it to mean "required" but I suppose that's incorrect, as curriculum seems to encompass all offered courses, as well as required.
I believe that when I was in jr high school, this was a portion of a Life Skills class, which also included basic cooking, etiquette, finances and child care. All students had to take it. No religion nor birth control options were covered, seems a shame that those options could have been part of it as well, as they are a very important Life Skill.
Just give each kid a 10 pound weight with a shrieking alarm radio inside it, that never shuts off, and send it home with them to "care for" every evening for a week.
Then on Friday give a seminar on birth control. Include abstinence, but teach the rest as well.
What?! "the governments job?" Surely you jest!
I share Autie's comment. What have we come to as a nation? However one of my grandmothers married at 16 and had her first child at 18. This was 1920. She and her husband were married for 65 years until she passed.
Birth control isn't what the person needs, they need to have self respect. That is something that comes from the family but when you are born without a father and a druggie mother, you are doomed. So SRS steps up and takes the burden of raising you. It is time for parents to step up and be a real PARENT. Stay off the stuff, what ever it is, and take care of your children. Don't know how? ASK SOMEONE WHO DOES.
Did Adam or Eve take a class in high school?
Nah, they were taught abstinence only. And look where that got them.
There is a disconnect in our society, but is forced controlling of others bodies such as autie suggests really the way to go?
damned if you do and dammned if you dont
I think it should be an elective.
I don't think there is enough time in the day to have electives that teach what the family should teach at home. Not home schooling but the training for life that parents should be teaching their children. Parents of all fiscal ways and means would rather be their kids friends and role models for greed comsumption then the teachers they should be. Schools get a verybad rap for the things they do and don't do. Parents will always believe their child over a responsible, educated adult. Spare me the "I know lots of bad/stupid teachers" cause "I know lots of bad/stupidpeople in whatever career path or non career path" you have chosen. The past several generations have been spoon fed and coddled. Parents take the easy or absent path in raising their kids. Look around you at all the kids with more "neccessaties" (phones, computers, Ipods/pads, cars) They didn't earn them, they expected and got them from parents too lazy to say no and who wanted to keep up with neighbors. Let's always attack/punish the schools when what happens at home the first 5 years gave them mush to work with.
Basic grammar and spelling would be a good start.
They also need to be taught "logic and ethics". But then again, when you learn that, you can't be a democrat.
Let's look at the question more blutly stated. "Should The State tell parents how to raise their kids?"
Very very dangerous to give these rights and responsibilities to The State.
Leave the politics out of this, please. Since the kids are not of legal age to vote, the snide comments are less than useful, although if the highlight of your day is making political comments on this forum, you have bigger issues in the first place.
Yes, kids need to learn at least the basics. Why? Because babies do not come with instruction manuals or universal translators. First time parents NEED the help and after the kids dash away to "escape" the parental units, the parents are rarely close enough to give much advice, let alone help.
Granted, we'd have to jerk their faces up from the screen of their cell phones long enough to manage this. Would have though that by now schools would have installed some form of a cell phone jamming device. If nothing else, the amusement of listening to the complaining would offset the annoyance of needing one in the first place.
I would rather see a course that shows real life ramifications of unsafe sex and showing the lives of high school moms living in poor housing while her friends are cheering at a football game. Show interviews of young adults with oozing herpes sores and genital warts. Show a movie of an abortion. Having a class on how to raise a baby is like having a class on how to snort cocaine or pot growing 101.
Not if the pretend baby is anything close to realistic, Larry. Mary Jane doesn't wake up screaming at 2 in the morning because it's hungry, or wet, or just to hear itself scream...
A week or two of that will definately catch attention...
"a class on how to snort cocaine or pot growing 101."
Definitely an elective!
Where will schools acquire the indestructible baby robots that make this possible?
They already make "baby simulators".
I've seen them - they look like dolls, but are programmed to periodically cry and need one of a small variety of things, like changing, feeding, etc.
Commenting has been disabled for this item.
Find more businesses on Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment ·